Clicky


Email this article Printer friendly page

 For Immediate Release
Sep 23, 2004 Contact: Press Office
202-646-5188


Appeals Court To Hear Judicial Watch Lawsuit Against Vice President Cheney

Organization’s Case For ‘Open Government’ Continues


(Washington, D.C.) Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit – all judges of the circuit presiding – will consider its lawsuit against Vice President Cheney regarding secret records from his controversial Energy Task Force.  Oral arguments in the case are set for January 27, 2005.

 

The U.S. Supreme Court in June sent the case back to the D.C. Circuit, asking it to consider crafting a more narrow discovery order and to hear arguments it had previously refused to consider relating to the constitutionality of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), or “open meetings” law, under which Judicial Watch filed its lawsuit.  The government had argued that Judicial Watch’s lawsuit to obtain information concerning the identities of the National Energy Policy Development Group (Energy Task Force) participants and other information violated the constitutional separation-of-powers doctrine. 

 

Judicial Watch brought its lawsuit in 2001 after being denied access to task force meetings and documents.  The suit was filed following a number of reports that lobbyists and energy company officials participated in the task force’s deliberations.  The participation of private individuals at task force meetings triggers FACA.

 

Also at issue before the unusual en banc panel of the Court of Appeals – usually, three judges preside – will be the continuing validity of a 1993 court decision concerning the public’s right to information from Hillary Clinton’s Health Care Task Force.  The D.C. Circuit  ruled that the make-up of that task force put it under FACA.  The Bush administration contends that any meeting of any task force member or staff with any lobbyist or corporate CEO – such as Enron’s Ken Lay – should be immune from public and congressional scrutiny.

 

“I look forward to the Court of Appeals considering this important case, which at its heart is about the public’s right to know how its government conducts the people’s business,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.  “I hope, whether it be in a Bush administration or a Kerry administration, we finally will be able to break the wall of secrecy surrounding the Energy Task Force.”



Top of Page



Group waiting for action on Code Pink digs - Washington Times (October 25, 2007)
Dishwashers for Clinton - Washington Post (October 22, 2007)
Papers? I Don’t See Any Papers. - Newsweek (Oct 29, 2007)
Their Seven Deadly Sins - American Spectator (October 18, 2007)
Accused Law Firm Continues Giving to Democrat - New York Times (October 18, 2007)
Prosecution Rests in California Bribery Trial - The Washington Post (October 18, 2007)
Hillary leads in donor refunds - Washington Times (October 17, 2007)
ARPAIO TARGETS DAY LABORER COMPLAINTS IN CITY OF PHOENIX - Maricopa County Sheriff's Office (October 15, 2007)
The Convict and the Congressman - Conde Nast (November 2007)
White House Denies Delaying Release of Clinton Records - New York Sun (October 12, 2007)
Effort to Curb Illegal Workers' Hiring Blocked - Washington Post (October 11, 2007)
He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton - Examiner.com (October 8, 2007)
Illegal immigrants are issued ID cards in some places - USA Today (October 4, 2007)
Former Presidents Can't Withhold Records - Washington Post (October 2, 2007)
Hsu raised big money for Clinton supporters - The Boston Globe (September 26, 2007)