Printed from JudicialWatch.org Dec 11, 2000 |
Contact: Press Office 202-646-5172 |
Son Works for Law Firm Representing Governor Bush in Supreme Court Case and Former Law Clerk Works for Law Firm Representing Governor Bush in Underlying Lower Court Case in Leon County Conflict Rules Do Not Technically Require Disqualification (Washington, D.C.) Today, lawyers for Gov. George W. Bush will be arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court as to whether or not the decision of the Florida Supreme Court should be reversed or affirmed. The lead counsel, Theodore Olson, Esq. of the law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, is a partner in the law firm of Justice Scalia�s son. In addition, a former Supreme Court law clerk of Justice Scalia works for the law firm of Bartlett & Beck, the trial law firm which took the lead role for Gov. Bush in questioning witnesses in the lower court proceeding giving rise to the Supreme Court case. Lanny Davis, a Clinton-Gore Administration surrogate, has called for Justice Scalia to recuse himself. 28 U.S.C. Section 455, the rule which governs such recusal, provides in part:
any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. 1. He shall also disqualify himself in the following circumstances: . . . 5. He or his spouse, or a person within the third degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person: . . .
2. Is known by the judge to have an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding. . . . Accordingly, since the decision to recuse himself is Justice Scalia�s alone, Judicial Watch calls upon him to consider the appropriate course of action and make public his reasoning (as Chief Justice Rehnquist did with the Microsoft case). The fact that Lanny Davis is calling for the recusal should not color Justice Scalia�s decision to do what he believes is appropriate in this case. |