Government Uncovered Freedom of Information Equals Freedom From Corruption
Access to information is vital to Judicial Watch’s efforts to
hold politicians accountable for their actions. Following is a summary
of information obtained by Judicial Watch through Justice Department
documents. It concerns an effort by the Clinton White House to discredit
Judge Royce C. Lamberth.
Background
Judge Royce C. Lamberth is one of the few judges who truly abides
by Judicial Watch’s motto that "no one is above the law!"
In the Clinton scandal cases that have come before his court, Judge
Lamberth has consistently held criminals in the Clinton Administration
accountable for wrongdoing. He sharply criticized the Clinton Commerce
Department for concealing and destroying documents related to Chinagate
and called for additional discovery. He forced Bill Clinton and
Al Gore to search for and produce e-mails pertaining to Filegate.
And in unprecedented fashion, Judge Lamberth ruled, for the first
time in history, that a sitting President committed a crime, when
Bill Clinton violated Kathleen Willey’s privacy rights by
releasing her personal correspondence. Documents obtained by JW
reveal that in response to the Willey decision, the White House
press machine sought to discredit, and potentially influence, Judge
Lamberth¹s decision.
Key Excerpts:
Internal Clinton Justice Department Memo, March 29, 2000, 2:26
PM
(Thomas J. Perelli)
"For those who have not seen the wire stories, Judge Lamberth
has found that there is sufficient evidence that the President and
his close advisors violated the Privacy Act with respect to the
release of Kathleen Willey’s letters… We have 20 days
to respond."
Release to News Media, March 29, 2000
(Beth Nolan, Counsel to President Clinton)
"…the Justice Department has consistently adhered to
the view that the White House Office is not subject to the Privacy
Act. Judge Lamberth’s opinion is inconsistent with that precedent.
The actions of the President and his staff were fully consistent
with the law… In light of these facts and the law, we strongly
disagree with Judge Lamberth’s opinion."
(Instructions were made to recipients that they "pass along"
the statement.)
Relevance
When combined with the other documents obtained by Judicial Watch,
it is clear that the Clinton Administration was threatened by Judge
Lamberth’s willingness to hold Clinton officials responsible
for their behavior. Not only did Clinton officials assemble a healthy
background file on Judge Lamberth, but that they also launched a
media campaign to call to question his application of the law. Such
activity can be seen as disrespectful at best and as an attempt
to improperly influence the Judge’s opinions in cases involving
the Clinton White House at worst.