JUDICIAL WATCH REPORT EXCLUSIVE Senator Charles Grassley Talks About the Estrada Nomination
Larry Klayman: We are joined now by Senator Chuck Grassley, one of
the greatest U.S. Senators we have ever encountered. Senator Grassley
is conservative and he puts the American people ahead of party affiliation
and that¹s why we admire him so much.
Tom Fitton: Thank you Senator Grassley for being with us. Sometimes
we may feel like we’re alone in town, but we’re not
alone because there are folks like you in the Senate who cast a
very critical eye on the operations of government and are very angry
and upset when government officials do things improperly.
Senator Grassley: One thing that separates Judicial Watch and me
from the rest of some people in Congress, particularly liberals,
is we have the Constitution on our side.
Klayman: Senator Grassley, you’re a member of the Senate
Judiciary Committee. Lost in the news of Iraq and heightened terror
alerts, is the controversy over the nomination of Mr. Estrada to
the D.C. Court of Appeals. By all accounts a fine, respected lawyer
who has the ability to serve. Nothing can be said against him, yet
some of your colleagues are gumming up the works.
Grassley: Well, simply put, I think it’s an effort among
the Democrats now, who are in the minority in the Senate, to turn
around the results of the last election. I suppose, under the cover
of potential war in Iraq, they feel that they can get away with
it.
Fitton: Senator, do you recall when there were concerns about an
African-American nominee by President Clinton? Republicans were
concerned about his qualifications, but the implication was made
that they opposed him because of race. At the same time, many Democrats
have come out against the most significant Hispanic nomination to
a court in years, if not the most significant, saying that he¹s
not Hispanic enough and, yet, we don’t see the same level
of outrage. A double standard perhaps?
Grassley: If I applied the same litmus test standard that they
have applied to Estrada, to Justice Ginsberg, Justice Bryer, Justice
Souter, that’s two Democrats and one Republican, I would have
had to vote against both of them.
Klayman: See what they’re probably scared of, Senator, is
having a conservative Hispanic on the bench, putting him in line
for the Supreme Court. There is now a big competition between the
Republican and Democratic party for Hispanic votes. They’re
worried that Republicans might have somebody to sell to the American
people.
Grassley: First of all, let’s make clear that this Mr. Estrada
was nominated because he’s very well qualified. He was Editor
of the Harvard Law Review, has a Law Degree Magna Cum Laude, Harvard
Law School, Phi Beta Kappa, Columbia College for undergraduate.
His nomination, I think, speaks very much though about opportunities
for the underprivileged, opportunities for immigrants.
Fitton: Are the Democrats going to successfully block the nomination?
Grassley: No, Senator Frist, our majority leader and all of the
Republicans are unified and will stand their ground. They’re
not going to let the Democrats overturn the results of the last
election and exercise their political muscle. This issue is about
intellectual honesty and the opposition to Estrada is intellectual
prejudice because Democrats believe that unless you think and act
like liberals, you aren’t fit to be on the Court.
Klayman: Well thank you Senator. We appreciate everything that
you do. Thank you for joining us and we hope to have you again,
soon.