Judicial Watch President Thomas Fitton: We are now joined by one of
our best guests ever, Dick Morris. He has a new book out and I love
the title: Off With Their Heads: Traitors, Crooks and Obstructionists
in American Politics, Media and Life. Welcome back to the program,
Dick Morris. How are you?
Dick Morris: Just wonderful. Thank you. I really
love this show and my book is quintessentially Judicial Watch.
Fitton: I am sure your book is competing nicely
with Hillary's new book.
Morris: I'm number two right behind her, right
now on Amazon... Let me tell you one thing that is in this book
that I think is right up your alley. The Democratic and Republic
parties both conspired in the 2000 reapportionment to deny us the
right to vote for the House of Representatives. You talk about term
limits. They made a mutual deal between the two parties to protect
one another's incumbence.
Fitton: This is gerrymandering?
Morris: Exactly. But gerrymandering, usually,
is to screw the other party. In this case, it was to screw the public.
They said if you put all the Democrats in my district we'll let
you put all the Republicans in your district, and we'll get the
swing districts we fight over down to about 20 out of 435 in the
country. By creating lifetime incumbency, you split the Democrats
and the Republicans. In 1980, after the reapportionment, 43 incumbents
lost. The total number of Congressmen who were defeated by challengers
from the other party in 2002, out of 435, was 4... so we really
don¹t have an elected House of Representatives.
Fitton: Speaking of shady deals behind closed
doors, what do you know about California Governor Gray Davis and
the recall effort?
Morris: One of the chapters in my book is very
specific about Gray Davis. It points out that in an effort to avoid
cutting his outrageous state spending, he has taken the money that
the tobacco industry was forced to pay to California to run anti-smoking
ads and used it to paper over his budget deficit. But, not only
has he done it for this year, he has obligated all of the anti-tobacco
money for the next 20 years to pay for the borrowing that he is
doing now to try to paper over the deficit.
Fitton: I do not want to toot your horn too much,
Dick, for fear of embarrassing you, but you could take credit for
the tobacco issue. The anti-tobacco movement is due by and large
to the political advice you gave to Bill Clinton. You suggested
to Mr. Clinton that he seize upon the tobacco issue, which resulted
in a lot of federal action in that area. It must be very upsetting
to you to see the corruption associated with trying to advance the
public health which, of course, was the stated reason for implementing
the tax.
Morris: Right. In the book, I list all the states
that are seizing the anti-tobacco money and I list the number of
deaths that those governors are responsible for because of it. In
the state of California, effective anti-smoking ads have been running
for 12 years and the lung cancer death rate is down by 14 percent
as compared to the national average of 2.8 percent. When Gray Davis
killed that program, he literally condemned thousands of Californians
to die so that he can avoid cutting his state spending.
Fitton: Well, Gray Davis does not have too many
friends and admirers, at least among those who listen to the Judicial
Watch Report. The mainstream press, however, that's a different
story.
Morris: This is a key point I make in my book.
I go through literally articles, month by month, that reveal the
bias of the New York Times, for example, and I culminate with a
story that will absolutely curl your hair. If you ever want proof
of the liberal bias of the American media, listen to this. In 1996,
when I was working for Clinton, I got a call from the managing editor
of the New York Times. Now to set the stage, the New York Times
had been leading the charge on Whitewater and Rose Law Firm and
the building records and Madison Guaranty and all of those Arkansas
scandals. Clinton was very upset with him. The managing editor told
me that the New York Times wanted an exclusive interview with Clinton.
And I said, "Clinton¹s pretty mad at you guys." And
he said, "Well, we don't think people are interested in reading
more about what went on in Arkansas years ago." It is a good
thing I had my seat belt on, because I was thinking to myself, "Did
the managing editor of the New York Times just tell me that in the
months before the election, he wouldn't cover Whitewater or Paula
Jones or the billing records or Webb Hubble or any of that stuff?"
He sure did. Clinton was positively giddy. The reporter actually
gave me the questions he was going to ask, which is about as common
as the Chicago Bears telling the New York Giants what passes they
are going to throw.
Fitton: Any tough ones?
Morris: No, no tough ones. Certainly no tough ones when you give
them in advance. But then I suggested pushing my luck, giving him
three questions that he proceeded to write down. The interview was
a softball. We hit every one out of the park because we knew what
was coming. They did not ask about Whitewater. And it is a matter
of record that in the period between Labor Day and Election Day,
1996, the words "Rose Law Firm," "Webb Hubbell,"
"Paula Jones" and "billing records," never appeared
on the front page of the New York Times.
Fitton: You used the word "Traitors,"
in the subtitle. What are you referencing?
Morris: Peter Arnett the reporter who was
hired by NBC. He literally went into Baghdad, and on the air, in
the middle of the war, with guns firing, said, "If you continue
your resistance, the people of the United States will realize how
evil this war is and turn against the Bush War policy." Now
that is outright
treason.
Fitton: In your book you write, "In hindsight,
Clinton left us naked and unprepared for the perils of terrorism."
We heard right after the attacks of September 11th that the Sudanese
president offered Osama bin Laden to the United States three times
and the Clinton Administration refused to take the offer. Can you
say why?
Morris: Yes. In the book I identify four things
that Bill Clinton could have done and did not do to prevent September
11 from happening and that is the first one. Clinton did not mobilize
an investigation of the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center.
He treated it like a bank robbery or criminal justice homicide.
As a result of that approach, it was not until 1996 that we realized
bin Laden was behind it. When the Sudanese offered us bin Laden,
who then was living in Sudan and about to flee to Afghanistan, and
said we'll arrest him and deport him to you, we said, "bin
who?" We basically had no idea who the guy was.
Another point I make in the book, is that in March of 1996, when
I was working for Clinton, I sent him a memo urging that driver's
licenses should expire when visas do for immigrants, and that the
FBI should interface with the INS and motor vehicle computers. That
way, when they busted somebody for a broken tailpipe or taillight
or speeding and found that he did not have a license, they could
check the computer and find out whether he was wanted on a terror-watch
list. Three of the September 11 hijackers were picked up for speeding
and did not have driver's licenses, and they still remained in the
United States.
Then the third action Clinton could have taken involved TWA Flight
800. I have no idea what caused that jet to go down, but I do know
that after it went down, I recommended that Clinton adopt the three
steps that Bush adopted right after September 11: Federalize the
security workers, X-ray the baggage, and issue photo ids for flyers.
Clinton was going to do that, but then the airline industry, led
by American Airlines, got a hold of him and lobbied against it and
said it would cost them money and congest the airports and freak
people out about flying. Clinton chickened out and did not impose
those regulations. So even if Bush knew September 11 was happening,
he lacked the security infrastructure at the airports to prevent
it.
The most important thing, however, was that after Oklahoma City
the FBI went to Clinton and said, "Please loosen the rules
for the Governor." The idea was, instead of only being able
to investigate people who are suspected of imminent acts of terror,
give us the capacity to investigate people who are members of terrorist
groups. Clinton and Reno refused. Then in August 9th of 2001, one
month before the terrorist attacks, we arrested Moussai, the 20th
hijacker, in Minneapolis. We couldn't examine his laptop computer,
which contained the September 11 plans, because of the rules that
Clinton had left in place.
Fitton: So this was due to mere regulations?
Morris: Clinton could have taken care of it with
a stroke of a pen.
Fitton: That is true. Hey, Dick, thanks for joining
us.
Morris: It was wonderful. Off with their heads!