Judicial Watch Victory Energy Task Force Must Turn Over Docs
Judicial Watch secured another crucial victory for openness and honesty
in government on July 8th. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia denied a last ditch appeal by lawyers for Vice President
Cheney¹s Energy Task Force, ruling that documents must be turned
over to Judicial Watch immediately.
The Bush administration formed the National Energy Policy Development
Group to develop the nation's energy policy in 2001. However, in
violation of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, or the open meetings
law, as it is better known, the task force refused to turn over
information pertaining to who was involved and what was discussed.
(This is same law conservatives accused Hillary Clinton of violating
when she attempted to launch her secret government takeover of the
nation¹s healthcare system in the early 1990s.)
Judicial Watch immediately filed Freedom of Information Act requests
and other legal actions to bring the inner workings of the Energy
Task Force out in to the open for public scrutiny. When the Bush
Administration refused to comply, JW had no choice but to file lawsuits.
Since that time, nearly 40,000 pages of documents from agencies
such as the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection
Agency have been released into the public domain. However, the Bush
administration is hanging tight to key information, such as what
lobbyists were invited to attend the policy sessions in The White
House. It is alleged that Enron¹s Ken Lay was a key participant,
along with other high-powered corporate lobbyists and environmental
activists.
In a ruling last October in Judicial Watch's case against the task
force, Judge Emmet Sullivan lambasted the Bush administration for
asserting virtual unlimited executive power in keeping task force
records secret, and for its unwillingness to comply with court orders.
The appeals court agreed, noting that with its appeal, the Bush
Administration was asking the court to transform "executive
privilege from a doctrine designed to protect presidential communications
into virtual immunity from suit." In a 2-1 decision, the court
ruled that focused discovery must now proceed.
"It has been my experience throughout Judicial Watch's nine
years that government officials fight transparency only when they
have something to hide," said JW Chairman Larry Klayman. "Otherwise,
why not simply play by the rules?"