Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Corruption Chronicles

Judge’s Unethical Behavior Forces Rule Change

Rampant ethics violations by judges across the nation have led to the Judicial Code of Conduct’s first revision in nearly two decades as well as the addition of a rule specifically forbidding sexual favors.

Since the Judicial Code of Conduct was last updated in 1990, about 70 judges across the country have been disciplined publicly for sexual harassment so the judicial ethics group that creates the guidelines has drafted some much-needed revisions for disciplining judges.

The amendments feature more specific behavior that judges should avoid. They include; “sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, comments about physical attributes, repeated and unwanted attempts at a romantic relationship, sexual gestures, offensive or suggestive remarks, sexually explicit questions, improper touching, lewd and vulgar language, suggestive or explicit pictures or images, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature that is unwelcome, regardless of gender.”

Additionally, the code covers other conduct issues such as when judges may accept gifts and in what instances they should disqualify themselves from hearing cases. The guidelines are created and drafted by the American Bar Association, the 400,000-member organization that serves as the national representative of the legal profession. The group is holding its annual conference in South Florida this week and is expected to officially adopt the new judicial guidelines.


Related

Texas Border Operation Captures Half a Million Illegal Immigrants, Thousands of Felons

Corruption Chronicles | April 18, 2024
The Biden administration’s failure to secure the Mexican border forced Texas officials to establish a security initiative that has endured heavy criticism from Democrats and the me...

Judicial Watch Sues Intelligence Chief for Damage Assessment on Joe Biden’s Mishandling of Classified…

Press Releases | April 17, 2024
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) for all re...

Riot revisited: Trump’s plan to pardon Jan. 6 defendants

In The News | April 17, 2024
From The Washington Examiner: Some, such as Tom Fitton, president of the conservative watchdog Judicial Watch, say the term hostages is a “fair analysis” and that Trump would be ri...