Corruption Chronicles ...because no one is above the law
Promoting Integrity, Transparency and Accountability in Government, Politics and the Law

Another Immigration Law Ruled Unconstitutional

A Clinton-appointed judge has ruled that a Dallas suburb’s ban on apartment rentals to illegal immigrants—passed by city lawmakers and later endorsed by voters—is unconstitutional because only the federal government can regulate immigration.

U.S. District Judge Sam A. Lindsay said that city leaders in Farmers Branch violated the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution because they didn’t defer to the federal government on this immigration matter. That, in turn, allows the federal government to pre-empt local laws, according to the judge.

The Farmers Branch council passed the ordinance in 2006 in an effort to curb the illegal immigration crisis that has devastated the entire state of Texas as well as other border states. The measure would have barred apartment rentals to illegal immigrants and required landlords to verify legal status in the country. Violators would have faced a misdemeanor charge punishable by $500.

Farmers Branch citizens subsequently voted—by a 2-to-1 margin—in favor of the ordinance, marking the nation’s first public vote on a local law to combat illegal immigration. Last year Judge Lindsay sided with a politically connected Latino rights group in temporarily blocking the measure from being enacted, claiming that Farmers Branch created its own classification to determine which non citizens may rent an apartment in the city.

The judge also said in his May 2007 temporary injunction that the ordinance deputized landlords to serve as federal immigration agents and that city officials were regulating immigration differently from the federal government. This week’s ruling simply makes that temporary injunction permanent.

Like many cities across the nation, Farmers Branch has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to defend legal challenges to laws aimed at curbing illegal immigration. Many of the nation’s smaller municipalities have been forced to abandon their own measures in order to avoid costly litigation. The first was a southern New Jersey town (Riverside), which actually reversed a law that punished those who hire or rent to illegal aliens under threat of litigation by a notoriously liberal civil rights group.

Several other local governments have seen their laws get defeated by liberal judges like Lindsay, whose 1998 appointment to the bench was historic because it made him the first black federal judge in Northern Texas. Escondido California and Hazleton Pennsylvania are among the municipalities whose measures to curb illegal immigration have been struck down in court.

One popular web site that claims to objectively rate judges across the nation posted a variety of unfavorable comments relating to Lindsay’s Farmers Branch ruling. One reader questions how a judge can stop something that the people voted for. Another challenges the judge’s alleged unconstitutionality of the Farmers Branch law, pointing out that his12-year-old has a better grasp of the Constitution.

Comments

Judge Lindsay needs to leave the bench.

It appears judge Lindsay has lost touch with reality. He needs to leave the
bench. He should know that the States have a right to enforce the laws the
federal government is not enforcing. Where has he been?

Please write to him and tell him to do the country, and law abiding American citizens a favor and remove himself from making decisions he is obviously not
in his right mind to make. He is a disgrace to the bench.

I would not lease to anyone

I would not lease to anyone that is in this country illegally. They may be deported at any time and I would have an empty unit to try to rent.

Perpetual criminalism

My main concern, as a citizen who has worked in construction and seen many friends lose more and more work to "cheap" labor, is the course we, the citizens, are left with.
They steal our social security numbers - we can't get the authorities to react.
They drive down our average pay - the corporate cogs love it.

At what point do the authorities recognize that there are many citizens who are on the bridge of joining groups we USED TO consider unscrupolous? Do we, the average citizens, need to injure not only illegal aliens but the corporate pigs who help them (for their own financial gains) before those who are supposedly there to help consider helping?

We've all heard somebody mouth off about this, before. I do not agree with this line of thinking; in fact, I have been known to stop that kind of talk in my presence. In light of recent events and the economical effect I have seen: I still do not agree with it, but you no longer hear me opposing it, either.

Immigration status local ordinance ruled unconstitutional

Every time I read this continuing rubbish, I want to throw up. The USDC US District Courts are Article IV Administrative Tribunals, acting as part of the Administrative " United States Corporation " and have no authority to handle Article III constitutional issues, accept any court case on constitutional issues, as it is not an Article III Court, has no authorization from Congress, and this clown is not an Article III Judge. The Farmers Branch Council can disregard this ruling with complete immunity, and should. The USDC has NO AUTHORITY to issue any order to a political Subdivision of the Sovereign State of Texas, or to any of the Sovereign Citizens of the State of Texas. The popular big media keeps perpetuating this rubbish, to achieve their politically correct intimidation. Farmers Branch should go public and openly challange this rubbish, and beat their drum loudly how illegal it is. Go to the website http://www.CitizensForTruthInGovernment.org and read the actual lack of authority for USDC, the 2 Americas, and the 2 Federal Court Systems. Currently, the only Article III court in America is the United States Supreme Court. Look for the flag in the Courtroom, if a gold fringe on the outside border, it is part of the United States Corporation administrative, hearing cases it has no authority to hear, on subjects it is not authorized for.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <div> <font> <br> <b> <i>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options



Donate
Judicial Watch News
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
State:


(c) 2007 Judicial Watch | user login