So for these “judges” to say that child-molesting rape, freedom-removing kidnapping, etc, are not really crimes, only demonstrates their baseless, racist idolatry: their use of the false term “moral turpitude” means nothing:

“It (a crime) can be committed without any intention of harming anyone, it need not result in actual harm, and it does not necessarily involve a protected class of victim. Only truly unconscionable conduct surpasses the threshold of moral turpitude.”

Yet crimes, by definition, *must* involve intent – and of course they need not result in actual harm (because even foiled, attempted crimes, are still crimes, due to intent) and they only need involve a human victim, not – as these group-might-made-rights worshipping liars pretend, a “protected class” of victim (like only sharia does)!

And finally, ALL crimes are examples of unconscionable conduct because they involve the intent to attack innocent others first!

There is no false “threshold of moral turpitude” at all, beyond basic intent (guilty mind/”mens rea”)!
And if anyone should know this, it’s a “judge!”

So, what’s really going on? Well, of course, it’s only the usual libertine liberalism in play:

Liberals are racists – they always assume that ONLY White, Western people (including, of course, the Jews in Israel,) are INTELLIGENT enough to be judged guilty of being truly evil, while all their pet “People Of Colour” (including, of course, the “swarthy palestinians,”) just can’t help being violent animals, the poor oppressed little dears, so they’ll always indulge their crimes, much as one ignores the new puppy as it pees on the rugs.

;-)