Judicial Watch • Election Integrity

Obama May Have Been Elected With Illegal Votes

IN THE NEWS

Hawaiian roll panel to publish name list

In a victory, Judicial Watch has released documents related to the separatist campaign being conducted by Hawaiians. The campaign is dependent on names of native Hawaiians, many of whom were placed on the list without their knowledge, and Judicial Watch has made the list public so Hawaiians can know if they are on the list, and whether they as Hawaiian citizens

PRESS RELEASE

Judicial Watch Announces Release of Government-Funded Race-Based Hawaii Enrollment List for Separatist Vote

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it obtained the race-based enrollment list of native Hawaiians created in accordance with the “Kana’iolowalu,” the controversial racial registration campaign run by the Native Hawaiian Roll Commission (NHRC). Judicial Watch obtained the list under a June 3, 2015 court order issued in…

WEEKLY UPDATE

Supreme Court Misrule

Supreme Court Undermines the Republic Judicial Watch Files Suit to End Gerrymandering in Maryland, Protect Constitution Obama Peddles Global Warming Fantasies, Attacks Political Opponents at Taxpayer Expense Supreme Court Undermines the Republic The whole idea behind lifetime appointments to the highest court in the land is to provide justices with…

IN THE NEWS

Lawsuit Aims To Fix Decades Old Election Problem

The Daily Caller reports on Judicial Watch’s historic lawsuit that would effectively eliminate the practice of gerrymandering.

IN THE NEWS

Maryland gerrymandering lawsuit: Judicial Watch claims all voters injured

Andrea Noble at the Washington Times writes about Judicial Watch’s historic gerrymandering lawsuit filed yesterday in federal court. In the lawsuit, Judicial Watch argues that all Maryland voters, regardless of party, are harmed by the state districting plan.

IN THE NEWS

State Roundup, June 25, 2015: Gerrymander Lawsuit

The Maryland Reporter writes on Judicial Watch’s historic lawsuit seeking to protect the voting rights of Maryland citizens. In the lawsuit, Judicial Watch provides the court with a formula that could be used in the drawing of legislative districts around the country.

PRESS RELEASE

Judicial Watch Files Voter Lawsuit Challenging Constitutionality of Maryland Gerrymandering Plan

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a voter lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Maryland’s gerrymandered congressional district maps.  The lawsuit was filed on behalf of voters in each of Maryland’s congressional districts.  Plaintiffs in the new lawsuit include Maryland Delegates Neil C. Parrott and Matt Morgan,…

PRESS RELEASE

Press Conference: Judicial Watch Lawsuit to End Gerrymandering

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced it will host a press conference at the National Press Club on Wednesday, June 24 to announce a new federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of congressional districts in Maryland. The lawsuit, to be filed on Wednesday, will propose a straightforward method to allow courts…

RECOMMENDED NEWS

Hillary’s Unlawful Plan to Overrule Voter-ID Laws

Hillary Clinton’s plan to “reform” state election laws is blatantly unconstitutional, and violates the states’ authority to set election parameters.

WEEKLY UPDATE

JW Beats IRS in Court

Federal Court Orders Obama IRS: Answer JW on Lerner Emails Judicial Watch Court Victory in Legal Fight over Hawaiian Racial Separatist Campaign Supreme Court Agrees to Take Up Cases on Rule of Law and Your Right to Vote Federal Court Orders Obama IRS: Answer JW on Lerner Emails Calling all…

PRESS RELEASE

Judicial Watch Statement on Supreme Court’s Decision to Grant Certiorari in Shapiro v. Mack

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the following statement in response to the Supreme Court’s decision Monday to grant certiorari to the plaintiffs in Shapiro et al. v. Mack et al., which challenges Maryland’s 2011 legislative redistricting plan on the grounds that it violates the voting rights of Maryland citizens…

RECOMMENDED NEWS

Indians and ‘Idiots’: DOJ Attacks State Power Over Elections

The Department of Justice is at it again. Led by Loretta Lynch, Justice is seeking to provide further electoral advantages to Democrats by trying to force states to change voting laws that are the prerogative of the states, in ways that would benefit Democrats running in competitive races.

IN THE NEWS

High court could push California rightward

The Supreme Court is considering arguments made in the case Evenwel v. Abbott, in which Texas citizens, along with Judicial Watch, are arguing that electoral districts should be drawn based on the number of U.S. citizens in the district, not just “persons,” which would include illegal immigrants. Electoral reform makes sense, and Judicial Watch is

WEEKLY UPDATE

JW Makes History

Judicial Watch Files Seven Lawsuits to Expose Clinton Email Scandal Skiing and Politicking on the Taxpayer Dime Are Courts Above the Law? Judicial Watch Files Seven Lawsuits to Expose Clinton Email Scandal Two months ago, on March 2, 2015, The New York Times reported then-Secretary Clinton used at least one…

WEEKLY UPDATE

JW Exposes Clinton Cash Machine

JW Lawsuit Exposes ‘Clinton Cash Machine’ Foreign Nationals Stealing Our Elections? JW Lawsuit Exposes ‘Clinton Cash Machine’ Judicial Watch’s independent work resulted in exposé after exposé this week on how Hillary and Bill Clinton corrupted the State Department. How did this all begin?  From one Judicial Watch lawsuit. Our dogged…

PRESS RELEASE

Judicial Watch, AEF File Amici Brief with Supreme Court Supporting Arizona, Kansas Efforts to Require Proof of Citizenship on Voter Registration Forms

‘Illegal voting at any level can change the outcome of elections.  And there is no acceptable amount of fraud.’ (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it has joined with the Allied Educational Foundation (AEF) to file an amici curiae brief with the United States Supreme Court in support of Arizona’s and…

RECOMMENDED NEWS

Suit questions court review of Maryland gerrymandering

Judicial Watch recently filed an amicus brief on behalf of Maryland residents whose voting rights are at risk. Talk Radio News has more.

PRESS RELEASE

Judicial Watch, Allied Educational Foundation File Amici Brief with U.S. Supreme Court Criticizing Texas’ Redistricting Rules that Dilute the Value of Citizens’ Votes

Texas’ apportionment effectively gives some of its citizens approximately 1.8 votes while others have only 1 vote.”  (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it joined with the Allied Educational Foundation (AEF) in the filing of an amicus curiae brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in support of Sue…

RECOMMENDED NEWS

Supreme Court lets Wisconsin voter ID law stand

IN THE NEWS

Watchdog group accuses Roll Commission of ignoring transparency

On behalf of the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, Judicial Watch filed a FOIA lawsuit against the Native Hawaiian Roll Commission regarding their  list of 122,785 Native Hawaiians. This commission seeks to rebuild a Hawaii Nation through this list, which was compiled without the consent of the people who are listed…


Sign Up for Updates!

Jill Farrell
Director of Public Affairs
(202) 646-5172 (x305)
(202) 646-5188
media/at/judicialwatch.org

(202) 646-5172
development/at/judicialwatch.org

Video and Multimedia


Sign Up for Updates!