<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Judicial Watch &#187; Investigative Bulletin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.judicialwatch.org</link>
	<description>Because no one is above the law!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 16:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>First Family Vacations</title>
		<link>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/first-family-vacations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/first-family-vacations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doligee@judicialwatch.org</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.judicialwatch.org/?post_type=inv_bull&#038;p=14927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judicial Watch has been at the forefront of exposing First Family abuse of taxpayer dollars. Our highly skilled investigative and legal teams have filed numerous FOIA requests as well as lawsuits to uncover the details about these vacations. Our persistence has yielded startlingly facts about what actually goes on during these vacations and the taxpayer...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judicial Watch has been at the forefront of exposing First Family abuse of taxpayer dollars. Our highly skilled investigative and legal teams have filed numerous FOIA requests as well as lawsuits to uncover the details about these vacations. Our persistence has yielded startlingly facts about what actually goes on during these vacations and the taxpayer money that funds them.Click this investigation to see what Judicial Watch has uncovered.</p>
<a name="judicial-watch-obtains-documents-detailing-the-cost-to-taxpayers-for-michelle-obamas-family-trip-to-africa"></a><h4><a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-obtains-documents-detailing-the-cost-to-taxpayers-for-michelle-obama-s-family-trip-to-africa/">Judicial Watch Obtains Documents Detailing the Cost to Taxpayers for Michelle Obama’s Family Trip to Africa</a></h4>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">On June 28, 2011, Judicial Watch filed a FOIA request seeking the mission taskings, transportation records, and passenger manifests for Michelle Obama’s Africa trip. Documents were only provided after Judicial Watch filed suit&#8230;</p>
<a name="malia-obama-vacations-in-mexico-with-25-secret-service-agents"></a><h4><a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2012/03/malia-obama-vacations-in-mexico-with-25-secret-service-agents/" target="_blank">Malia Obama Vacations In Mexico With 25 Secret Service Agents</a></h4>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Keeping with the Obama family’s penchant for costly vacations, the president’s 13-year-old daughter enjoyed spring break in a country plagued by so much violence that the State Department has issued travel warnings to discourage Americans from going there.</p>
<a name="michelle-obamas-august-2010-vacation-in-spain-cost-american-taxpayers-467585-according-to-records-obtained-by-judicial-watch"></a><h4><a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/michelle-obamas-august-2010-vacation-in-spain-cost-american-taxpayers-467585-according-to-records-obtained-by-judicial-watch/" target="_blank">Michelle Obama’s August 2010 Vacation in Spain Cost American Taxpayers $467,585 According to Records Obtained by Judicial Watch</a></h4>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Judicial Watch obtained documents from the United States Air Force and the United States Secret Service detailing costs associated with Michelle Obama’s controversial August 2010 vacation to Spain.  According to a Judicial Watch analysis, the records indicate a total combined cost of at least $467,585.</p>
<a name="judicial-watch-sues-us-air-force-for-records-detailing-costs-of-michelle-obamas-august-2010-whirlwind-vacation-to-spain"></a><h4><a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-sues-u-s-air-force-for-records-detailing-costs-of-michelle-obamas-august-2010-whirlwind-vacation-to-spain/" target="_blank">Judicial Watch Sues U.S. Air Force for Records Detailing Costs of Michelle Obama’s August 2010 ‘Whirlwind’ Vacation to Spain</a></h4>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Judicial Watch announced that it filed a lawsuit on March 5, 2012, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against the United States Air Force to obtain records detailing Michelle Obama’s controversial August 2010 vacation to Spain.  Overall, Judicial Watch is seeking information pertaining to the costs to taxpayers for this vacation as well as any indication of official business conducted by Mrs. Obama while she was in the country <em><a href="http://www.scribd.com/JWatchDC/d/84121644-Michelle-Obama-Spain#fullscreen" target="_blank">(Judicial Watch v. USAF (No. 1:12-cv-00345)).</a></em></p>
<a name="judicial-watch-sues-air-force-and-secret-service-for-records-detailing-michelle-obamas-family-ski-vacation-to-aspen-colorado"></a><h4><a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-sues-air-force-and-secret-service-for-records-detailing-michelle-obamas-family-ski-vacation-to-aspen-colorado/" target="_blank">Judicial Watch Sues Air Force and Secret Service for Records Detailing Michelle Obama’s Family Ski Vacation to Aspen, Colorado</a></h4>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit <a href="http://www.scribd.com/JWatchDC/d/96028981-FiledComplaint6-5#fullscreen">(<em>Judicial Watch v. U.S. Air Force and U.S. Secret Service</em> (No. 1:12-cv-00866))</a> on May 31, 2012 against the United States Air Force and the United States Secret Service to obtain records detailing Michelle Obama’s February 2012 President’s Day weekend ski vacation to Aspen, Colorado with her two daughters.</p>
<a name="michelle-obamas-family-ski-trip-to-aspen-colorado-cost-taxpayers-at-least-83-thousand-say-records-obtained-by-judicial-watch"></a><h4><a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/michelle-obamas-family-ski-trip-to-aspen-colorado-cost-taxpayers-at-least-89-thousand-say-records-obtained-by-judicial-watch/">Michelle Obama’s Family Ski Trip to Aspen, Colorado Cost Taxpayers at Least $83 Thousand Say Records Obtained by Judicial Watch</a></h4>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Judicial Watch obtained records from the <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/100439352/Aspen-Trip#fullscreen" target="_blank">United States Air Force</a> and the <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/100439344/1618-FinalResponse#fullscreen" target="_blank">United States Secret Service</a> detailing Michelle Obama’s February 2012 President’s Day weekend ski vacation to Aspen, Colorado, with her two daughters.</p>
<a name="2010-marred-by-debt-waste-costly-hawaiian-vacation"></a><h4><a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2010/12/2010-marred-debt-waste-costly-hawaiian-vacation/">2010 Marred By Debt, Waste, Costly Hawaiian Vacation</a></h4>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">As U.S. taxpayers dish out millions for President Obama’s lavish Hawaiian vacation crushing year-end statistics reveal unprecedented government debt and a myriad of waste that should outrage all Americans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/first-family-vacations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$18 million spent on translation services by Bureau of Prisons</title>
		<link>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/18-million-spent-on-translation-services-by-bureau-of-prisons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/18-million-spent-on-translation-services-by-bureau-of-prisons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 20:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doligee@judicialwatch.org</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bureau of prisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[translation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wasteful spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.judicialwatch.org/?post_type=inv_bull&#038;p=14389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judicial Watch obtained 149 pages of documents from the Federal Bureau of Prisons detailing an agency policy to translate documents into 43 languages, with the heaviest emphasis on Spanish because “the single largest group of inmates of foreign nationality are from Mexico, Central and South America, and the Caribbean.”  The agency has gone so far...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judicial Watch obtained 149 pages of documents from the Federal Bureau of Prisons detailing an agency policy to translate documents into 43 languages, with the heaviest emphasis on Spanish because “the single largest group of inmates of foreign nationality are from Mexico, Central and South America, and the Caribbean.”  The agency has gone so far as to develop an in-house of database of jailhouse jargon, stating that the self-produced dictionary would “avoid high costs and potential delay associated with purchasing found translations.”  Judicial Watch obtained the documents in response to a December 7, 2011 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking all records under the Obama administration stemming from use of languages other than English in the U.S. penal system.  Although the Bureau of Prisons stated in its determination letter to Judicial Watch that it did not hire outside translators, <a href="http://usaspending.gov/search?form_fields=%7B%22search_term%22%3A%22JUSTICE%2C+DEPARTMENT+OF%22%2C%22fyear%22%3A%5B%222010%22%2C%222011%22%2C%222012%22%5D%2C%22recipient_duns%22%3A%5B%22148815173%22%5D%2C%22dept%22%3A%5B%221500%22%5D%2C%22psc_code%22%3A%5B%5D%7D&amp;sort_by=dollars&amp;per_page=25" target="_blank">usaspending.gov</a> shows that the U.S. Department of Justice (of which the prison system is a part) has spent more than $18 million on prison-related language services under the Obama administration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/18-million-spent-on-translation-services-by-bureau-of-prisons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arne Duncan&#8217;s closed-press meeting with National Council of La Raza President</title>
		<link>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/arne-duncans-closed-press-meeting-with-national-council-of-la-raza-president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/arne-duncans-closed-press-meeting-with-national-council-of-la-raza-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doligee@judicialwatch.org</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.judicialwatch.org/?post_type=inv_bull&#038;p=14418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judicial Watch has obtained 18 pages of internal communications from the U.S. Department of Education, one of which shows the agency’s secretary, Arne Duncan, scheduled a closed-press meeting with National Council of La Raza President Janet Murguia.  Judicial Watch obtained the documents in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking: 1) All...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judicial Watch has obtained 18 pages of internal communications from the U.S. Department of Education, one of which shows the agency’s secretary, Arne Duncan, scheduled a closed-press meeting with National Council of La Raza President Janet Murguia.  Judicial Watch obtained the documents in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking:</p>
<p>1) All records of communications with or about the following individuals:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"> A) White House Domestic Policy Council Cecilia Muñoz; and,</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">B) National Council of La Raza President Janet Murguía;</p>
<p> 2) All records of communications with or about the following groups:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">A) Alabama Coalition for Immigrant Justice; and,</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">B) National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).</p>
<p>The time frame for the request was December 8, 2011 through the present.  The topic areas specified were “undocumented immigrant(s)” and “housing discrimination.”  Judicial Watch undertook the investigation after a March 4th protest in Alabama where Obama administration officials marched arm in arm with members of radical amnesty groups to protest state Senate Bill 56 as well as photo ID laws nationwide.  La Raza, whose former immigration director Cecilia Munoz is now White House Domestic Policy Counsel, organized the event in conjunction with reverends Al Sharpton, director of the National Action Network (NAN), and Jesse Jackson, Jr., leader of the recently disgraced Rainbow PUSH Coalition.  Secretary Duncan’s secret meeting with Raza President Murguia appears to have addressed No Child Left Behind waivers.  La Raza is reportedly concerned that minorities will lose special treatment and funding as Obama lets states opt out of the Bush-era reading standards. <a href="http://prospect.org/article/coming-battle-over-nclb-exemptions">http://prospect.org/article/coming-battle-over-nclb-exemptions</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/arne-duncans-closed-press-meeting-with-national-council-of-la-raza-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USDA and &#8220;Culture of Transformation&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/usda-and-culture-of-transformation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/usda-and-culture-of-transformation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doligee@judicialwatch.org</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USDA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.judicialwatch.org/?post_type=inv_bull&#038;p=14318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 16, a U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) employee tipped off Judicial Watch to compulsory training underway nationwide that entails requiring staffers to bang on tables while chanting in unison that America’s founding fathers were illegal immigrants.  In response, Judicial Watch on May 18 filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking all...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On May 16, a U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) employee tipped off Judicial Watch to compulsory training underway nationwide that entails requiring staffers to bang on tables while chanting in unison that America’s founding fathers were illegal immigrants.  In response, Judicial Watch on May 18 filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking all records since January 2010 of USDA’s dealings with Souder, Betances &amp; Associates, a Chicago-based consultancy focused on cultural sensitivity training.  According to usaspending.gov, USDA has paid Mr. Samuel Betances and his firm nearly $200,000 in the past two years to institute a “cultural transformation”  of the agency following Secretary Tom Vilsack’s knee-jerk firing of Shirley Sherrod.</p>
<p>Today, Judicial Watch received 46 pages of responsive documents from one small division of USDA called the Food &amp; Nutrition Service (FNS).  The records released today show that FNS spent $2,350.97 to send Vincent Loran, the division’s Training Administrator, to Skokie, Ill., for Betances’ three-day course.  Additionally, the records show:</p>
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/107192917/Loran-Blessing-Betances" target="_blank">a January 17, 2012 email</a> in which Loran seeks Betances’ blessing, referring to him as father, and professing his love.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/107192901/Agency-Hiding-Video" target="_blank">an October 10, 2011 email</a> in which Loran promises Betances he will keep secret a video of a training session shot on USDA premises which the agency to date refuses to release.</li>
</ul>
<p>Today’s disclosure came in response to Judicial Watch’s July 10 administrative appeal, which challenged that agency’s initial release of only six heavily-redacted pages.  A response to Judicial Watch’s initial FOIA was due on June 18.  A response to Judicial Watch’s appeal was due on August 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/usda-and-culture-of-transformation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawmaker pressures U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) to assign airport slot to campaign contributor</title>
		<link>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/lawmaker-pressures-u-s-department-of-transportation-dot-to-assign-airport-slot-to-campaign-contributor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/lawmaker-pressures-u-s-department-of-transportation-dot-to-assign-airport-slot-to-campaign-contributor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 15:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doligee@judicialwatch.org</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.judicialwatch.org/?post_type=inv_bull&#038;p=14845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) show that a Western lawmaker pressured the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) to assign a highly-coveted airport slot to a campaign contributor.  In a series of letters, U.S. Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) urged Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood to approve Alaska Airline’s application for nonstop service from...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) show that a Western lawmaker pressured the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) to assign a highly-coveted airport slot to a campaign contributor.  In a series of letters, U.S. Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) urged Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood to approve Alaska Airline’s application for nonstop service from Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) in an exception to the perimeter rule.  DCA’s perimeter rule bars direct flights from airports more than 1,250 mile away that lack international border screening capabilities.</p>
<p>According to lobbying records kept by the U.S. Congress, Alaska Airlines has spent more than one million dollars since the fall of 2009 lobbying the U.S. Congress, DOT, the White House, the National Transportation Safety Board, and the U.S. Customs &amp; Border Patrol for the exemption.  Federal Elections Commission records show that the airline’s political action committee, Alaska Air Group, gave $2000 toward Blumenauer’s 2012 primary race.  The airline itself gave Blumenauer’s campaign $3,000 as well.</p>
<p>Judicial Watch filed the attached FOIA request on November 9, 2011 following Blumenauer’s appearance at a Cincinnatti rally to promote the Obama administration’s “American Jobs Act.”  DOT released responsive documents to Judicial Watch on June 12, a month after it had granted Alaska Air the sought-after exemption.</p>
<ul>
<li>DOT picks Alaska Airlines: <a href="http://www.dot.gov/affairs/2012/dot5512.html">http://www.dot.gov/affairs/2012/dot5512.html</a></li>
<li>WSJ on the rule’s history: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704754304576096322639404288.html">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704754304576096322639404288.html</a></li>
<li>The Economist offers analysis: <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/gulliver/2012/05/ronald-reagan-washington-national-airport">http://www.economist.com/blogs/gulliver/2012/05/ronald-reagan-washington-national-airport</a></li>
<li>Characterizing Obama’s Jobs Act as a Campaign Tool: <a href="http://www.talkingsides.com/blogs/2011/10/21/congress-just-a-campaign-tool-to-obama">http://www.talkingsides.com/blogs/2011/10/21/congress-just-a-campaign-tool-to-obama</a></li>
<li>U.S. Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR-3) and Cincinnatti Mayor Mark Mallory host a Jobs Act rally: <a href="http://www.cincinnati-oh.gov/mayor/pages/-44544-/">http://www.cincinnati-oh.gov/mayor/pages/-44544-/</a></li>
<li>Lettermarking is the new earmarking: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/06/us/politics/congress-appears-to-be-trying-to-get-around-earmark-ban.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=1">http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/06/us/politics/congress-appears-to-be-trying-to-get-around-earmark-ban.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=1</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/lawmaker-pressures-u-s-department-of-transportation-dot-to-assign-airport-slot-to-campaign-contributor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FEMA’s failure to recover $300k of food &amp; shelter overpayments for longer than 6 months</title>
		<link>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/femas-failure-to-recover-300000-of-food-shelter-overpayments-for-longer-than-6-months/</link>
		<comments>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/femas-failure-to-recover-300000-of-food-shelter-overpayments-for-longer-than-6-months/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>judicialwatchhq@gmail.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FEMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Waste]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.judicialwatch.org/?post_type=inv_bull&#038;p=13715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Government agencies are required to generate a report each quarter listing high-value overpayments and the actions being taken to recover those funds.  The Inspector General for the Department of Homeland Security published its list for Quarter 2 of Fiscal Year 2012 last Tuesday (May 29, 2012).  A fuller explanation and the report itself is attached..Meanwhile,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Government agencies are required to generate a report each quarter listing high-value overpayments and the actions being taken to recover those funds.  The Inspector General for the Department of Homeland Security published its list for Quarter 2 of Fiscal Year 2012 last Tuesday (May 29, 2012).  A fuller explanation and the report itself is attached..Meanwhile, the highlights:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Overpayments discovered between 1/1/2012 – 3/31/2012:</span></p>
<p>Overpaid             Recovered       Outstanding balance</p>
<p>$452,652.74     $391,305.71     $61,347.03</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Previously reported overpayments which remain uncollected as of 3/31/2012: </span></p>
<p>Overpaid             Recovered since the last report        Outstanding balance</p>
<p>$1,350,710.29     $7,007.14                                             $1,343,703.15</p>
<p>*<strong>Collection is NOT underway respecting $362,484.63 of the above because FEMA is unclear about the legality of recovering improperly issued Emergency Food &amp; Shelter funds.</strong>*</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Uncollected overpayments referred to Treasury for tax garnishment</span>:</p>
<ul>
<li>$19,239.54 paid by FEMA to an INDIVIDUAL in Seabrook, TX for “Individuals &amp; Households Payments.”  DHS-IG first reported the improper payment on November 11, 2008.</li>
<li>$38,563.00 paid by the U.S. Coast Guard to a Miami, FL entity for a product or service.  DHS-IG first reported the overpayment on September 25, 2010.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/femas-failure-to-recover-300000-of-food-shelter-overpayments-for-longer-than-6-months/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS Inspector General cites taxpayer confidentiality law to withhold records of employee fraud</title>
		<link>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/irs-inspector-general-cites-taxpayer-confidentiality-law-to-withhold-records-of-employee-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/irs-inspector-general-cites-taxpayer-confidentiality-law-to-withhold-records-of-employee-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 21:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doligee@judicialwatch.org</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.judicialwatch.org/?post_type=inv_bull&#038;p=13624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In April 2012, Judicial Watch learned that a former IRS employee had sued the agency for a quarter million dollars and expungement of his record after he was fired in October 2010.  After Anthony Yemoh Smith lost in court, Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act request seeking all records pertaining to accusations that...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In April 2012, Judicial Watch learned that a former IRS employee had sued the agency for a quarter million dollars and expungement of his record after he was fired in October 2010.  After Anthony Yemoh Smith lost in court, Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act request seeking all records pertaining to accusations that Smith falsified travel vouchers he submitted to his supervisor for reimbursement as well as any other files uncovering similar instances of fraud by IRS employees.  The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) on May 14, 2012 denied Judicial Watch’s request in full, stating that:</p>
<ul>
<li>TIGTA did not possess any employment records for Anthony Yemoh Smith;</li>
<li>The agency could neither confirm nor deny the existence of an investigation into Smith’s misconduct;</li>
<li>A total of 1,720 pages comprising 15 Reports of Investigation (ROI) respecting the falsification of travel vouchers by other IRS employees were located for the period of August 1, 2010 through the date of the request.  However no part of them could be released because the privacy interests of the employees falsifying travel vouchers outweighed any public interest in the thefts they conducted in the course of their employment with the federal government.</li>
</ul>
<p>On May 14, 2012, Judicial Watch administratively appealed TIGTA’s denial since the pertinent facts had all been aired in open court.  TIGTA affirmed its blanket denial on June 15, amending only its previous failure to acknowledge the existence of an ROI into Smith’s misconduct.  Additionally, in upholding its earlier decision to withhold all records in the 15 other fraud investigations identified, the agency – charged in part with supervising the IRS – said it had no way of distinguishing the guilty from the innocent because it was a separate entity from the IRS.  It also cited a statute designed to protect information submitted by taxpayers in filing returns each spring.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, according to court documents, Smith’s on-the-job misconduct was discovered in August 2010.  In the course of the investigation, TIGTA agent Kevin Davies also learned that Smith had been arrested in 2007 for obstructing a police officer.  Davies informed IRS Territory Manager Cindy Halpert and Group Manager Richard Ledger as well as Assistant United States Attorney Mark Crooks.  AUSA Crooks declined to prosecute Smith.  Ms. Halpert apparently fired him.  Because of TIGTA’s secrecy, it is not clear how much money the IRS has lost to travel voucher fraud among employees nor if any stolen funds have been recovered</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/irs-inspector-general-cites-taxpayer-confidentiality-law-to-withhold-records-of-employee-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Cordray appointment to Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)</title>
		<link>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/richard-cordray-appointment-to-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-cfpb/</link>
		<comments>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/richard-cordray-appointment-to-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-cfpb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doligee@judicialwatch.org</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appointments clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cfpb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Cordray]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.judicialwatch.org/?post_type=inv_bull&#038;p=13555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CFPB is a federal agency launched on July 21, 2011 by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. It is funded through the Federal Reserve (in an amount equal to 10% of the Federal Reserve’s budget), alleviating it from congressional oversight through the ordinary appropriations process. On Thursday, June 7, 2012 Judicial Watch...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CFPB is a federal agency launched on July 21, 2011 by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. It is funded through the Federal Reserve (in an amount equal to 10% of the Federal Reserve’s budget), alleviating it from congressional oversight through the ordinary appropriations process.</p>
<p>On Thursday, June 7, 2012 Judicial Watch sued the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) for release of documents requested on January 12 and January 25 relating to Richard Cordray’s appointment as the agency’s director without Senate confirmation. In response to the lawsuit, the agency produced a dozen pages of responsive documents, supplementing a March 30 initial production of 222 pages. The supplemental release (described by the agency as final with respect to this matter) came via emails to Judicial Watch sent at 9:59 p.m. and 10:19 p.m. on Friday, June 8th. The new documents reveal that:</p>
<ul>
<li>A Barney Frank staffer named Kate harbored unanswered questions regarding the president’s legal authority to appoint a CFPB director in the manner that he did. The actual questions are redacted from the documents CFPB produced. However, many legal analysts have said that, even assuming the Senate was in recess at the time of the appointment the way the President characterized it, the CFPB did not have a vacancy for purposes of the Constitution’s recess clause because, as a new agency, it had not yet had a director. (CFPB-2012-037, p. 10-11).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>President Obama contracted with a vendor untold funds to hold an event (likely Cordray’s swear-in ceremony) in the CFPB amphitheater on Friday, January 6th. Equipment included six to eight folding tables, making it likely that 30 or more people attended the event, although no pictures have yet to be disclosed. (CFPB-2012-042, p. 4).</li>
</ul>
<p>The following column by Congressman Spencer Bachus (AL -6) advocates this appointment was inconsistent with the Constitution. Congressman Bachus is Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. Click <a href="http://bachus.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=1124&amp;Itemid=108" target="_blank">here</a> for the column.</p>
<p>Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)  released on September 28, 2012 an additional <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/107819292/Cord-Appt-Supp" target="_blank">17 pages in full and 8 pages</a> in part pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed against the agency by Judicial Watch, Inc. on June 7, 2012.  The FOIA sought all records surrounding Richard Cordray’s “recess” appointment as director of the new agency, created under the auspices of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010.</p>
<p>Along with its disclosure of 25 pages, CFPB admitted to <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/107818875/Cordray-Appt-Supp-Cvr-Ltr-2 " target="_blank"><strong>withholding 880 pages more, citing unexplained confidentiality</strong></a>, privacy, and law enforcement concerns.  In support of this decision, the agency wrote:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Pursuant to our agreement, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (&#8220;Bureau&#8221;) has conducted an additional search for records responsive to your client’s Freedom of lnformation</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Act requests dated January 12, 2012, and January 25,2012. Attached to this letter, please find an additional 25 pages of records responsive to your requests. Of these records, the Bureau has</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">determined that 17 pages are releasable in full and that 8 pages are releasable in part pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(5) and/or (b)(6). An additional 880 pages have been withheld in full pursuant to 5 U.S.C. <em>§ </em>552(b)(5), (b)(6), and/or (b)(7).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>CFPB has until October 26 to justify its withholdings in court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/richard-cordray-appointment-to-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-cfpb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>St. Paul Squeeze</title>
		<link>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/st-paul-squeeze/</link>
		<comments>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/st-paul-squeeze/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 15:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doligee@judicialwatch.org</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.judicialwatch.org/?post_type=inv_bull&#038;p=14372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On April 4, Judicial Watch filed public records requests at the city and federal levels pursuant to an investigation into the Obama administration’s involvement in a housing discrimination suit arising out of St. Paul, Minnesota.  Landlords of budget rentals had brought suit against the city – and won – alleging that excessive code enforcement against...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On April 4, Judicial Watch filed public records requests at the city and federal levels pursuant to an investigation into the Obama administration’s involvement in a housing discrimination suit arising out of St. Paul, Minnesota.  Landlords of budget rentals had brought suit against the city – and won – alleging that excessive code enforcement against their properties would have the effect, if not the intent, of harming racial and ethnic minorities in greater proportion than St. Paul residents of other backgrounds.  The legal theory, known as “disparate impact,” is more commonly used by the U.S. Department of Housing &amp; Urban Development to encourage out-of-court settlements against mortgage lenders.</p>
<p>According to a February 13 editorial in the Wall Street Journal, the U.S. Department of Justice pressured the city to withdraw its case from the U.S. Supreme Court, where the case had been slated for argument.  Apparently, federal officials feared the city would lose again, setting unfavorable precedent for the Obama administration.  According to the paper, if the landlords won, the “disparate impact” theory would no longer be a government tool for punishing instances of racism it perceived but could not prove.  Rather, any over-regulation which resulted in less housing for ethnic or racial minorities would now be vulnerable to being struck down under the same theory.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>What follows is a run-down of responses so far:</p>
<p>The City of St. Paul has remained silent in violation of its Data Practices Act;</p>
<p>The U.S. Department of Justice on April 4 asked Judicial Watch to clarify which St. Paul case it was referring to and on June 11 asked whether it meant “and” at the place in the Freedom of Information Act request where Judicial Watch said “or”;</p>
<p>The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development on May 3 asked Judicial Watch to explain what it meant by “disparate impact,” even though the agency published a rule defining the term on November 16, 2011, 9 day after the U.S. Supreme Court granted the city’s petition for certiorari (agreed to hear the case);</p>
<p>The Federal Housing Finance Agency (the guardian of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s assets) told Judicial Watch on April 30 that it had found a 208-page document responsive to Judicial Watch’s request but that it was withholding it in full based on a trade secrets privilege.  Judicial Watch administratively appealed that determination on May 25.  A decision in that appeal is due on June 22.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/st-paul-squeeze/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FAA Chief&#8217;s DUI Resignation</title>
		<link>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/faa-chiefs-dui-resignation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/faa-chiefs-dui-resignation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 22:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doligee@judicialwatch.org</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.judicialwatch.org/?post_type=inv_bull&#038;p=13523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On August 29, 2011, Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood launched a multi-year advertising campaign called: “Driver Sober or Get Pulled Over,” according to the agency’s website. Click here for the press release on the campaign. On Saturday, December 3, 2011, Federal Aviation Administrator Randy Babbitt was pulled over on suspicion of drunken driving in Fairfax,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On August 29, 2011, Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood launched a multi-year advertising campaign called: “Driver Sober or Get Pulled Over,” according to the agency’s website. Click <a href="http://www.nhtsa.gov/About+NHTSA/Press+Releases/2011/USDOT+Warns+Drivers:+'Drive+Sober+or+Get+Pulled+Over'">here</a> for the press release on the campaign.</p>
<p>On Saturday, December 3, 2011, Federal Aviation Administrator Randy Babbitt was pulled over on suspicion of drunken driving in Fairfax, Virginia after a trooper saw him driving on the wrong side of the road, per an AP report published in USA Today. Click <a href="http://travel.usatoday.com/flights/story/2011-12-06/FAA-chief-resigns-after-drunken-driving-arrest/51680182/1">here</a> to view the report. LaHood said in the AP report that he was disappointed to learn of Babbitt’s arrest through a press release issued on Monday, December 5, 2011 by the Fairfax City Police Department.</p>
<p>Babbitt resigned on Tuesday, December 6, 2011 facing drunk driving charges on evidence he had consumed just under the legal limit for that state, according to AVWeb, a pilot newsletter.  Three weeks later, Judicial Watch filed a FOIA request (link below) seeking all records relating to Babbitt’s DUI and dismissal.  Fulfillment of the request was due on January 26.  Following many excuses, the agencies produced all responsive records on April 30.  On May 10, a Virginia judge dismissed the charges against Babbitt based on dashboard video which the judge characterized as involving a “normal” left turn, despite Babbitt’s failure to use a turn signal, the pilot newsletter said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/faa-chiefs-dui-resignation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.872 seconds. --><!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-01-21 07:03:49 -->