September 25, 2002

 

BY FACSIMILE (850-922-4292 / 850-922-9002) AND MAIL

 

Honorable Jeb Bush                                                            Ms. Kathleen Shanahan

Governor                                                                    Chief of Staff

Executive Office of the Governor                                    Executive Office of the Governor

400 S. Monroe Street                                                            400 S. Monroe Street

The Capital                                                                The Capital

Tallahassee, FL 32399                                                Tallahassee, FL 32399

 

Mr. Ken Allman

Director of Administration

Executive Office of the Governor

400 S. Monroe Street

The Capital

Tallahassee, FL 32399

 

 

Re: Florida Public Records Act Request

 

Dear Governor Bush, Ms. Shanahan & Mr. Allman:

 

Pursuant to the provisions of the Public Records Act, Chapter 119 of the Florida Statutes. please disclose and provide any and all documents and/or records from January 1, 1998 to and including the present that refer or relate in any way to:

 

1. Cuba;           

 

2. Cuban-Americans and/or Florida’s population of Cuban-Americans;

 

3. Cuban-American and/or Hispanic voting patterns;

 


4. Cuba-U.S. trade policy and procedures;

 

5. Fidel Castro;

 

6. Communications and/or documents which refer or relate to communications or

                            contact between the Florida Governor, his office, employees and/or agents with                               or by and between the President of the United States and or The White House                                  and its agents and employees concerning items 1-5, above.

 

 

For purposes of responding to this request, the term “document” is used in its broadest sense, and includes originals and drafts of any kind of written or graphic matter, however produced or reproduced, of any kind of description, whether sent or received or neither, and all copies thereof that are different in any way from the original (whether by interlineation, receipt stamp, notation, indication of copies sent or received or otherwise), regardless of whether designated “confidential,” “privileged,” or otherwise, including without limitation, any paper, book, account, photograph, blueprint, drawing, agreement, contract, memorandum, advertising material, letter, telegram, object, report, record, transcript, study, note, notation, working paper, intra-office communication, interoffice communication, chart, minute, index sheet, receipts, account statements, computer software, computer data, check, check stub, delivery ticket, bill of lading, invoice, flow sheet, price list, quotation, bulletin, circular, manual, summary, graph, recording of telephone or other conversation or of interviews, or of conferences, or any other written, recorded, transcribed, punched, taped, filmed, or graphic matter, however produced or reproduced. The term “document” also includes without limitation, any tape recording, videotape, computerization, or other electronic recording, whether digital or analog or a combination of the two, and expressly includes all “electronic mail” and representations of the same as stored on any file server or other device. This request includes copies of every document related to the matter, regardless of the format in which the information is stored.

 

If you refuse to provide this information, Chapter 119 requires you advise Judicial Watch in writing and indicate the applicable exemption to the Public Records Act.  Also, please state with particularity the reasons for your decision, as required by Section 119.07(2)(a).  If the exemption you are claiming only applies to a portion of the records, please delete that portion and provide photocopies of the remainder of the records, according to Section 119.07(2)(a).

 

Judicial Watch, hereby requests expedited processing of this request and a waiver of both search and duplication fees.

 


Federal statutes serve as a guide for expedition and fee waivers relating to requests for public records, specifically the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”).  Judicial Watch, Inc. is entitled to a waiver of search fees because the records it seeks are not sought for a commercial use and Judicial Watch, Inc. is a member of the news media.. As a 501 (c)(3) not-for-profit organization, Judicial Watch, Inc. has no commercial purpose.  It is a non-profit, tax-exempt educational foundation organized to increase public understanding of government operations and activities, as well as the importance of ethics and the rule of law in government.  Judicial Watch, Inc. regularly requests information about the operations of government through FOIA and other means, uses its editorial skills to turn this information into distinct works, and regularly publishes and disseminates its work to the public in furtherance of its educational mission.

 

Judicial Watch, Inc. Is entitled to expedited processing for this request because Judicial Watch is primarily engaged in information dissemination, and demonstrates a compelling urgency for the requested information to inform the public of the actual or alleged activity.

 

Judicial Watch, Inc. uses the following means, among others, to disseminate its works to the public:

 

(1)            Judicial Watch, Inc. produces several live radio programs, including a two-hour program entitled “The Judicial Watch Report,” which airs nationally once every week on approximately 43 radio stations.  Judicial Watch produced an hour long Spanish language program that aired twice weekly on WQBA -- 1140 AM in Miami, Florida.  Since October 29, 2001, Judicial Watch, Inc. also has produced a two-hour program that airs daily on the USA Radio Network.  Judicial Watch, Inc.’s weekly and the daily radio programs also can be heard via the Internet at www.USARadio.com and www.JudicialWatch.org.

 

(2)            Judicial Watch, Inc. also produces and broadcasts a twice weekly television program entitled the “The Judicial Watch Report,” which is seen on the Dish Network and the Liberty Network among others.  The producer of this program is  Brian Doherty, who formerly produced “The O’Reilly Factor” and “The Drudge Report” on the Fox News Channel.  A Spanish language production of the Judicial Watch report airs weekly on Wednesday mornings on cable televison’s TeleMiami in South Florida.

 

(3)            Judicial Watch, Inc. also maintains an Internet site, www.JudicialWatch.org, on which the public can view and inspect records obtained through FOIA, records obtained through civil litigation, press releases, editorial works, deposition transcripts and court opinions, among other materials.  This website is viewed by over 1,700 people per day on average, and on several occasions, has logged up to 600,000 visitors in a single day. 

 

(4)            Judicial Watch, Inc. also publishes a monthly newsletter, which is sent to approximately 210,000 individuals.  It also utilizes an E-mail Infonet service which sends out updates of Judicial Watch’s activities over the Internet on nearly a daily basis to 13,700 persons.

 


(5)            Judicial Watch, Inc. also produces several editorial works each week in the form of press releases, which are “blast faxed” to hundreds of radio and television stations, as well as newspapers throughout the country

 

(6)            Judicial Watch, Inc. also publishes periodic reports.  For example, on September 28, 1998, Judicial Watch, Inc. published its Interim Report on Crimes and Other Offenses Committed by President Bill Clinton Warranting His Impeachment and Removal from Elected Office.  This 145-page report was accompanied by nearly 4,000 pages of supporting documentation, and was crafted, in part, from the raw materials obtained by Judicial Watch, Inc. through FOIA requests.  This distinct work has been disseminated widely to the public.  On or about August 10, 1999, Judicial Watch, Inc. published its Filegate Status Report, which is 136 pages long and is supported by nearly 1000 pages of documentation. Another recent report by  Judicial Watch, Inc. is The Judicial Watch Florida Recount, an independent, non-partisan analysis of the results of Florida’s hotly contested 2000 Presidential election based upon an sampling of ballots reviewed by Judicial Watch, Inc. pursuant to Florida’s version of FOIA.  This document was published on March 22, 2001.  In addition, Judicial Watch, Inc. published The Judicial Watch 2002 “State of the Union” Report, Bush Administration Ethics Enforcement: “A Failure of Leadership,” in February 1, 2002, and it’s most recent publication is Fatal Neglect: The US Governments Continuing Failure to Protect American Citizens from Terrorists, published September 11, 2002.

 

 

Judicial Watch also uses records it obtains pursuant to Florida law at public events such as conferences, seminars and speeches. For example, in October of 2001, Judicial Watch held its third annual “Ethics in Government Conference” in Miami, Florida.  Previous conferences were held in Pasadena, California (1999), and Washington, DC (2000).  Judicial Watch also works with other media organizations to publish new stories that are in the public interest.  The Chairman and President of Judicial Watch, Inc. also frequently appear on nationally broadcast television and radio programs.  Judicial Watch is a member of the National Religious Broadcast Association and has been granted press credentials at a number of national conventions and other events. 

 

Judicial Watch, Inc. therefore qualifies as a member of the media and is entitled to a waiver of search fees.  See National Security Archive v. U.S. Department of Defense, 880 F.2d 1381 (D.C. Cir. 1989).  In fact, Judicial Watch, Inc. has been recognized previously as a member of the media in other FOIA litigation.  See Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice, 133 F. Supp.2d 52 (D.D.C. 2000).

 

Judicial Watch, Inc. also is entitled to a complete waiver of both search fees and duplication fees. Again, because Judicial Watch, Inc. has no commercial purpose, its request is not “in the commercial interest of the requestor.”

 


Judicial Watch, Inc.’s request is likely to contribute significantly to the public’s understanding of government operations and activities.  Typically, agencies look to the following four points in making this determination:  (1) whether the subject of the request concerns the operations or activities of government; (2) whether disclosure of the requested records is likely to contribute to an understanding of government operations or activities; (3) whether disclosure of the requested records will contribute to a “reasonably broad” audience and whether the requestor has the “ability and intention” to disseminate the information to the public; and (4) whether disclosure of the requested record will contribute “significantly” to the public understanding.    

 

Judicial Watch, Inc.’s requested information is urgently needed, warranting expedited processing, in order to inform a broad public concern about the actual or alleged activity of the government of the State of Florida, through Judicial Watch Inc.’s status as a  non-profit, tax-exempt educational foundation organized to increase public understanding of government operations and activities.

 

Without question, the subject-matter of the request concerns the operations and activities of government, and an “urgency” exists to immediately disseminate this information regarding these activities to the  public, namely to uncover relations and policy with a country and its people, Cuba, which is on the U.S. terrorist watch list, as well as the requestee’s political considerations in carrying out these relations and policies.

 

Second, disclosure of the requested records will contribute to an understanding of this particular investigation, as the requested records relate directly to dealings with a terrorist state.

 

Third, disclosure of the requested record will contribute to the understanding of “a reasonably broad audience of persons interested in the subject” and Judicial Watch, Inc. has a demonstrable “ability and intention” to convey the information to the public, as evidenced by the description of its various media outlets outlined above.  A “reasonably broad” audience obviously is interested in the subject-matter of this request. Judicial Watch, Inc. intends to disseminate the information it obtains in response to this request via its radio programs and its other media outlets.

 

           Given these compelling circumstances, Judicial Watch, Inc. is entitled to a public interest fee waiver of both search costs and duplication costs. We request to receive the requested documents and a full public interest fee waiver within ten (10) business days.

 

As a 501 (c)(3) not-for-profit organization, Judicial Watch, Inc. has no commercial purpose.  It is a non-profit, tax-exempt educational foundation organized to increase public understanding of government operations and activities, as well as the importance of ethics and the rule of law in government.  Judicial Watch, Inc. regularly requests information about the operations of government through public records requests, the Freedom of Information Act, and other means, uses its editorial skills to turn this information into distinct works, and regularly publishes and disseminates its work to the public in furtherance of its educational mission

Judicial Watch requests these records be available in ten days or by October 5, 2002. If you have any questions, or need more information in order to expedite this request, please contact Irene Garcia at 305-349-2391.

 

Sincerely,

 

JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.

 

 

 

 

 

Larry Klayman

Chairman and General Counsel