BY FEDEX
December 6, 2002
U.S. Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission
Washington Field
Office
1400 L Street, NW,
Suite 200
Washington, DC 20005
Equal Employment Opportunity Complaint
Dear Sir/Madam:
I. INTRODUCTION
Judicial Watch, Inc. (“Judicial Watch”) is a non-profit, non-partisan,
public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption
and abuse. Judicial Watch represents
hundreds of United States Postal Service (“USPS”) workers and a USPS workers’
support group organized as “Brentwood Exposed,” concerning all matters related
to the October 2001 anthrax attacks.
On behalf of its USPS worker clients, and in the public interest of all
Americans, Judicial Watch launched an investigation of the October 2001 anthrax
attacks, focusing principally on the Brentwood Road Postal Facility
(“Brentwood”), now known as the “Joseph Curseen, Jr. and Thomas Morris Jr.,
Processing and Distribution Center,” after two Brentwood USPS workers died from
inhalation anthrax they contracted working with mail in the contaminated
Brentwood facility. An additional two
Brentwood USPS workers contracted inhalation anthrax, but subsequently
recovered.
As part of the Brentwood anthrax investigation, Judicial Watch filed
Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) requests under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. §
552 with the USPS and other federal agencies.
When the USPS failed to respond to our FOIA request, we filed suit
against the USPS in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on
June 6, 2002. (See: Judicial Watch,
Inc. v. U.S. Postal Service, Civil Action No. 01-1101 (HHK)). On September 11, 2002, United States
District Judge Henry H. Kennedy, Jr. ordered Defendant (USPS) to “produce all
documents or portions thereof which are responsive to Plaintiff’s request. .
.by October 21, 2002.”
Judicial Watch received a portion of the documents Judge Kennedy
ordered produced via U.S. Mail from the USPS on October 23, 2002. The USPS document production of October 23,
2002 is woefully incomplete, as well as poorly reproduced, organized and
assembled. Despite these shortcomings,
Judicial Watch conducted a careful inspection and analysis of the materials
provided by the USPS. The documents
produced contain stunning, new information that clearly merits a full and
immediate investigation by your office.
Attached, as Exhibit 1 you will find the diary or log of a senior
Brentwood postal official whom we believe by document content and/or context to
probably be Brentwood Postal Facility Senior Plant Manager Timothy C.
Haney. The diary/log attached as
Exhibit 1 is marked with Bates Stamp numbers 00290, 00291, 00292 and
00293. Section V – Facts, below details
the contents of the diary/log.
II. PETITIONERS/COMPLAINANTS
Ms. Dena Briscoe, President of Brentwood Exposed, on behalf of its
individual members and all other affiliated Brentwood Postal Facility employees. All petitioners/complainants are federal
sector employees. The Brentwood Exposed
Petitioners include, but are not limited to, the individuals identified in
Appendix A, attached.
III. STATUTORY AUTHORITY
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII).
IV. DISCRIMINATION ALLEGED
Petitioners/Complainants were discriminated against by their
Employer - The United States Postal
Service because of their race and/or national origin.
V. FACTS
1. The Employer, USPS, knew on
or about Thursday, October 18, 2001 that
“mail was leaking” anthrax spores into the environment at the United
States Brentwood Postal Facility located in Washington, DC.
2. The USPS knew on or about Thursday, October 18,
2001 that Brentwood and its
approximately 2,200 United States Postal Employees were “affected” by anthrax
spores.
3. The USPS knew on or about Thursday, October 18, 2001
of the “exact machine (DBCS 17) that had been used to sort the mail” containing
the anthrax spores found in Senator Daschle’s letter.
4. The USPS contacted on or
about Thursday, October, 18, 2001 URS (a biological testing company) to arrange
on-site testing for anthrax spores at Brentwood.
5. The USPS directed on or about Thursday, October 18, 2001 URS
to take 30 scientific anthrax spore swab tests of DBCS # 17 and the “manual
cases for ZIP Code 20510 (The Senate).”
6. The USPS received on or about Thursday, October 18,
2001 the 30 URS scientific anthrax spore swab tests results of DBCS # 17 and
the manual cases for ZIP Code 20510 (The Senate).
7. The USPS knew on or about Thursday, October 18, 2001
that the 30 URS scientific anthrax spore swab test results indicted that DBCS #
17 and the manual cases for ZIP Code 20510 (The Senate) tested positive for
anthrax spores. Indeed, in the USPS’
own words: “Again, they tested hot.” (Emphasis added.) [Attached, as
Exhibit 1, is the Diary or Log of a Senior Brentwood Postal Management Official
whom Petitioners/Complainants believe by document content and/or context to probably be Brentwood Postal Facility
Senior Plant Manager Timothy C. Haney.]
8. The USPS, to avoid closing Brentwood at an estimated cost (per Plant
Manager Haney) of $500,000.00 per day, concealed on or about Thursday October
18, 2001 from its estimated 2,200 Brentwood Postal Employees (97 % Racial
Minority Representation) the fact
that the USPS knew that anthrax spores had contaminated Brentwood’s postal
machines and building.
9. The USPS, to avoid closing
Brentwood at an estimated cost (per Plant Manager Haney) of $500,000.00 per
day, failed on or about Thursday, October 18, 2001 to follow the emergency
isolation/evacuation mandates of its own Management Instruction: Emergency
Response to Mail Allegedly Containing Anthrax (Effective Date: October 4,
1999/Serial Number EL-860-1993-3). (See
Exhibit 2 - Attached Copy of this Anthrax Management Instruction.)
10. The USPS, by failing to
follow the mandates of its own regulation on or about Thursday, October 18,
2001, breached its responsibility to provide “a safe and healthful work
environment for its employees.”
11. The USPS, by failing to
follow the mandates of its own regulation on or about Thursday, October 18,
2001, abrogated “management’s responsibility to minimize potential exposures
through quick isolation and evacuation until emergency response and law
enforcement can arrive and take control of the incident.”
12. The USPS, by concealing
the anthrax spore contamination at Brentwood from their Postal Employees
and by failing to follow their own officially promulgated Anthrax Emergency
Isolation/Evacuation Instruction, recklessly and needlessly exposed an
estimated 2,2000 Brentwood Postal Employees (24 hours a day, seven days a week)
to anthrax spores from on or about Thursday, October 18, 2001 through the
eventual closure of Brentwood on late Sunday, October 21, 2001.
13. The USPS, by concealing the anthrax spore contamination at
Brentwood from their Postal Employees and by failing to follow its own
officially promulgated Anthrax Emergency Isolation/Evacuation Instruction
recklessly and needlessly prevented an estimated 2,200 Brentwood Postal
Employees from timely (1) being medically tested (nasal swab and/or blood
tests) for exposure to anthrax spores and (2) receiving preventative/curative
antibiotics (i.e., Cipro and/or Doxycycline).
14. The USPS’ above-referenced
concealment of anthrax spore contamination at Brentwood and the USPS’ failure
to implement its Anthrax Emergency/Isolation Instruction at Brentwood is in
stark contrast to its prior diligent and effective actions on or about Tuesday,
October 8, 2001 in notifying and medically testing for anthrax spores the machines/premises and all estimated 25 -
35 Postal Employees at the Boca Raton Post Office in Florida where the
anthrax-laden letter addressed to American Media was processed.
15. The USPS’ actions ,
individually and collectively, deprived the estimated 2,200 Brentwood Postal
Employees of (1) Procedural Due Process under the 5th Amendment, (2)
Substantive Due Process under the 5th Amendment, (3) Liberty
Interest in a Safe Workplace under the 5th Amendment, and (4) Equal
Protection of the Law under the 5th Amendment.
16. With respect to the instant
EEOC Complaint, the USPS’ actions individually and collectively discriminated
against the estimated 2,200 Brentwood Postal Facility Employees based upon their race and/or national origin.
17. Specifically, whereas the
USPS affirmatively notified on or about October 8, 2001, the Boca Raton Postal
Workers of their exposure to anthrax spores and immediately took remedial
measures, to include providing all the Boca Raton Postal Workers with medical
tests and with preventative/curative antibiotics, the USPS (with similarly
situated 2,200 Postal Workers at Brentwood) actively concealed the fact of
anthrax exposure from its 2,200 Brentwood Postal Workers, actively failed to notify the 2,200 Brentwood Postal
Facility Employees of anthrax exposure, and actively failed to take any
significant remedial measures such as providing the 2,200 Brentwood Postal
Workers with medical tests and with preventative/curative antibiotics.
18. This blatantly inconsistent
and discriminatory treatment of the 2,200 Brentwood Postal Workers (as opposed
to the Boca Raton Postal Workers) is premised upon their race and/or national
origin - 97% of the Brentwood Postal Workers are members of a Minority Race
and/or National Origin.
19. Similarly, whereas the
Federal Government immediately notified Federal Workers on Capitol Hill of
anthrax exposure and immediately closed/evacuated the Federal Buildings on
Capitol Hill and immediately provided medical tests and antibiotics to all
affected Capitol Hill Federal Workers, no such measures were forthcoming from
the Federal Government and/or the USPS at the Brentwood Postal Facility where 97%
of the Postal Workers are of Minority Race and/or National Origin.
20. The grotesque and disparate
discriminatory treatment afforded the 2,200 Brentwood Postal Workers stands in
marked contrast to the treatment afforded (only 5- 10 days earlier) the Boca
Raton Postal Workers and the Federal Capitol Hill Workers/Staffers. Minority Race and/or National Origin are the
primary/root cause of this blatant discrimination and fraudulent concealment of
anthrax exposure.
21. The disparate,
discriminatory treatment afforded the 2,200 Brentwood Postal Workers also
stands in marked contrast to the fact that members of The White House staff
(also federal sector employees) were promptly provided the antibiotic Cipro as
early as September 11, 2001, within hours of the World trade Center and Pentagon
attacks.
22. Although pragmatic
concerns about fiscal savings and maintaining mail production quotas were
secondary and tertiary factors in recklessly keeping the Brentwood Postal
Facility open and online from October 18, 2001 - October 21, 2001; the primary
and dominant factor in the USPS decisional matrix was the fact that the 97%
Minority Constituency at the Brentwood Postal Facility had little or no voice
in the debate as opposed to the white/affluent voices emanating from Capitol
Hill and/or the rich enclave of Boca Raton, Florida. Race and/or National Origin, not economics or production quotas,
motivated the USPS to blatantly discriminate against and recklessly endanger
the health of the 2,200 Brentwood Postal Workers - four of whom contracted
inhalation anthrax resulting in the deaths of two Postal Workers. Just as racial discrimination, economics and
production quotas characterized antebellum plantations, so too do racial
discrimination, economics and production quotas characterize the Brentwood
Postal Facility.
23. Specific Legal Allegations: In instant case, the Federal Government and the USPS (by
failing to follow its own regulation) subverted/sabotaged Petitioners’ access
to the remedies provided under the United States Postal Service Anthrax
Emergency Isolation/Evacuation Instruction, thereby:
A. Denying
Petitioners procedural/substantive due process under the 5th
Amendment (Failure of USPS to follow/implement the mandate of the officially
promulgated Postal Service Anthrax Emergency Isolation/Evacuation Instruction
resulted in reckless and needless exposure to anthrax spores, with concomitant
adverse medical consequences,)
B. Depriving
Petitioners of their Liberty Interest in Safe Workplace under the 5th
Amendment [See Figueroa v. United States, 7 F.3d 1405 (9th
Cir. 1993) and Grubbs, 974 F. 2d at 121.]. (Failure of USPS to follow/implement the mandate of the
officially promulgated Postal Service Anthrax Emergency/Evacuation Instruction
resulted in reckless and needless exposure to anthrax spores, with concomitant
adverse medical consequences.)
C. Depriving
Petitioners of Due Process (Equal Protection) under the 5th
Amendment. (Timely Notification and
Remedial Medical Procedures provided to all 25 - 35 Boca Raton Postal Employees
on or about October 9, 2001 were not provided to 2,200 Brentwood Postal
Employees from on or about October 18, 2001 - October 21, 2001 – a period of at
least four working days where the Brentwood Plant was running 24 hours a
day, seven days a week.)
D. Depriving
Petitioners of Procedural/Substantive Due Process (i.e., redress of grievance)
through USPS ongoing and continuing
concealment of all the material facts/circumstances surrounding anthrax
leakage/exposure at Brentwood from on or about October 18, 2001 through October
23, 2002, thereby frustrating/depriving Petitioners of an opportunity to
perfect and file a viable Title VII Federal EEO action (in a timely manner
within the statute of limitations) premised upon all the operative facts
previously withheld by the USPS and only made finally available on October 23,
2002 as a result of the Freedom Information Act lawsuit entitled, Judicial
Watch, Inc. v. U. S. Postal Service, Civil Action No. 01-1101 (HHK). (See
Attached Exhibit 3).
E. Depriving
Petitioners of Procedural/Substantive Due Process (i.e., redress of grievance)
through USPS ongoing and continuing concealment of all the material
facts/circumstances surrounding anthrax leakage/exposure at Brentwood from on
or about October 18, 2001 through October 23, 2002, thereby
frustrating/depriving Petitioners of an opportunity to perfect and file viable
Federal Employee Compensation Act (FECA) and/or Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) claims (in a timely manner within the
statute of limitations) premised upon all the operative facts previously
withheld by USPS and only made finally available on October 23, 2002 as a
result of the Freedom Information Act lawsuit entitled, Judicial Watch, Inc.
v. U. S. Postal Service, Civil Action No. 01-1101 (HHK). (See Again
Exhibit 3).
24. Tolling of the EEOC 180 Day
Statute of Limitations Due to USPS’ Affirmative Concealment of Anthrax Exposure from on or about October 18, 2001
through October 23, 2002.
A. Specifically,
Petitioners/Complainants allege that, but for the USPS’ fraudulent concealment
of anthrax exposure over a year’s period of time, instant EEOC
Petition/Complaint would have been timely filed within the requisite 180 day
period.
B. By
fraudulently concealing relevant and material facts for over a year from Petitioners/Complainants,
the USPS frustrated/deprived Petitioners/Complainants of the right to perfect
and file in a timely manner a viable EEOC Complaint.
C. The
routine legal/equitable remedy for such concealment and fraud perpetrated on
Petitioners/Complainants and the entire legal process by the USPS is to toll
the running of the statute of limitations.
D. Consequently,
Petitioners/Complainants submit that they have 180 days from October 23, 2002
within which to submit a timely EEOC Complaint.
VI. CONCLUSION
Judicial Watch, in the public interest, and on behalf of its USPS
worker clients, urges your swift response to the serious matters raised
herein. The Brentwood postal workers
have suffered grievously; not just the deadly anthrax pathogen that was
unleashed in their confined workplace, but from a hostile/discriminatory
workplace environment characterized by dehumanizing and humiliating treatment
by senior USPS and U.S. government officials.
Throughout the anthrax crisis and in the following weeks and months,
Brentwood workers faced threats, intimidation and harassment. There seemed to be an orchestrated campaign
that perversely aimed at twisting their plight as brave survivors of an act of
terrorism into something dishonorable and unworthy, namely psychosomatic
malingerers. Our clients deserve
better, seeking only justice and accountability.
In light of the information above, we hereby request the EEOC issue a
protective order to insure any and all USPS records, documents and/or
communications concerning the October 2001 anthrax attacks are preserved and
maintained – and not destroyed, removed or “routinely disposed of” by the USPS.
We stand ready to assist you in your investigation.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this important matter.
Sincerely,
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Larry Klayman
Chairman and General
Counsel
Encl:
Appendix A – Complainants: Brentwood Postal Workers
Exhibit 1 – USPS FOIA Documents (Bates No. 00290 - 00293)
Exhibit 2 – USPS Management Instruction: Emergency Response to Mail
Allegedly Containing Anthrax (Effective Date: October 4, 1999/Serial Number
EL-860-1993-3)
Exhibit 3 – USPS FOIA Document Production Cover Letter
CC: Postmaster General, United
States Postal Service