the basis for your POLITICAL comment has absolutely no merit in law. Law is not judochristian bibical harrasement but supposely to be given equal to all no matter sex, creed or race. Now since gayism can fall under sex or creed then the ruling did follow the letter of law of giving all the right of marriage. Your statement about poly's is so absurd as it is plain to demean gays. The JW is truely homophopic
the basis for your POLITICAL
the basis for your POLITICAL comment has absolutely no merit in law. Law is not judochristian bibical harrasement but supposely to be given equal to all no matter sex, creed or race. Now since gayism can fall under sex or creed then the ruling did follow the letter of law of giving all the right of marriage. Your statement about poly's is so absurd as it is plain to demean gays. The JW is truely homophopic