Read "Fatal Probe". Esp. chap. VII.

Excerpt:

Does the vaccine sound like good news? Not
if you buy into the physician-touted dormancy
theory. Where is the “common knowledge” that
HPV can remain dormant in a woman’s body for
30 years, or more? By basing the vaccine’s 100%
effectiveness in preventing HPV infection on the
fact that the vaccinated women did not develop
infection for up to 27 months, the study and all its
enthusiasts abandon the dormancy concept.

“…the vaccine was 100 percent
effective. Followed for 17 to 27 months, no
vaccinated women developed infections…
…The study will continue until all the
women have been tracked for four years.”

Obviously, the dormancy theory was
disregarded, scrubbed or dramatically
overlooked. The logical explanation is that the
dormancy theory is baseless and false. It is a
placating lie. It is suspected that, in the
excitement of the moment, and in true herd
mentality, pragmatism won the day.

But, whether HPV “may remain dormant,”
“can remain dormant,” “can remain dormant for
months, for years or for many years,” “usually
remains dormant,” “usually remains dormant
forever” or “can remain dormant in your system for the
rest of your life,” the question remains:

How can one justify their support for a
vaccine study that claims success after tracking
the subjects for up to 27 months – and plans to
abandon follow-up after 48 months – without any
mention of the dormancy theory if they indeed
believe in such a theory.

But, keep in mind, this is only and excerpt. I would
be glad to publish the entire MS here; however, I
assume that is not acceptable.

BTW, I'm not trying to sell a book here, folks...
just add a bit of common logic.
William Parrish