Skip to content

Judicial Watch • 1609 Doe Fisker

1609 Doe Fisker

1609 Doe Fisker

Page 1: 1609 Doe Fisker


Number of Pages:5

Date Created:February 14, 2012

Date Uploaded to the Library:February 20, 2014

Tags:1609, fisker, Doe

File Scanned for Malware

Donate now to keep these documents public!

  • demand_answers

See Generated Text   ˅

Autogenerated text from PDF


Because one above the law! 

425 Third SL, SW, Suite 800, Washington, 20024 Tel: (202) 646-5172 1-888-593-8442 FAX: (202) 646-5199  Email: 
Department Energy February 14, 2012 Page 2of3 
electronically, magnetically, mechanically stored material any kind, including 
without limitation all electronic mail email; (3) any audio, aural, visual, video records, recordings, representations any kind; any graphic materials and data compilations from which info1mation can obtained; and (5) any materials using other means preserving thought expression. 
Judicial Watch also hereby requests waiver both search and duplication fees pursuant U.S.C.  552(a)(4)(A)(ii)(I1) and (a)(4)(A)(iii). Judicial Watch entitled waiver search fees under U.S.C.  552(a)( 4)(A)(ii)(Il) because member 
the news media. National Security Archive Department Defense, 880 F.2d 1381, 
1387 (D.C. Cir. 1989)(defining news media within FOIA context). Judicial Watch has also been recognized member the news media other FOIA litigation. See, e.g., Judicial Watch, Inc. U.S. Department ofJustice, 133 Supp.2d (D.D.C. 2000); and, Judicial Watch, Inc. Department Defense, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44003, 
(D.D.C. June 28, 2006). Judicial Watch regularly obtains information about the 
operations and activities govenunent through FOIA and other means, uses its editorial 
skills turn this information into distinct works, and publishes and disseminates these 
works the public. intends likewise with the records receives response this request. 
Judicial Watch also entitled complete waiver both search fees and duplication fees pursuant U.S.C.  552(a)(4)(A)(iii). Under this provision, records: 
shall furnished without any charge charge 
reduced below the fees established under clause (ii) 
disclosure the information the public interest 
because likely contribute significantly public 
understanding the operations activities government 
and not primarily the commercial interest the 
requester. U.S.C.  552(a)(4)(A)(iii). 
Judicial Watch 501(c)(3), not-for-profit, educational organization, and, definition, has commercial purpose. Judicial Watch exists educate the public about the operations and activities government, well increase public 
understanding about the importance ethics and the rule law government. The 
particular records requested herein are sought part Judicial Watch's ongoing efforts document the operations and activities the federal government and educate the public about these operations and activities. Once Judicial Watch obtains the requested records, intends analyze them and disseminate the results its analysis, well the records themselves, special written report. Judicial Watch will also educate the 
public via radio programs, Judicial Watch's website, and/or newsletter, among other 
outlets. also will make the records available other members the media 
Department Energy February 14, 2012 Page of3 
researchers upon request. Judicial Watch has proven ability disseminate information obtained through FOIA the public, demonstrated its long-standing and continuing public outreach efforts. 
Given these circumstances, Judicial Watch entitled public interest fee waiver both search costs and duplication costs. Nonetheless, the event our request for waiver search and/or duplication costs denied, Judicial Watch willing pay $350.00 search and/or duplication costs. Judicial Watch requests that 
contacted before any such costs are incurred, order prioritize search and duplication efforts. effort facilitate record production within the statutory time limit, Judicial Watch willing accept documents electronic format (e.g. e-mail, .pdfs). Judicial Watch will also accept the "rolling production" documents. you not Wlderstand this request any portion thereof, you feel you require clarification this request any portion thereof, please contact immediately 202-646-5172 look forward receiving the requested documents and waiver both search and duplication costs within twenty 
(20) business days. Thank you for your cooperation. 

John Althen Judicial Watch 
Fisker Renegotiate DOE Loan Page 1of4 

Published EnergyBoom 
Fisker Renegotiate DOE Loan 

Fisker Renegotiate DOE Loan 

Fisker Karma 
million conditional loan from the U.S. Department 
Energy, DOE. 
The loan was contingent Fisker meeting certain production and sales milestones, 
Karmas showroom floors r121 and another ,200 languishing the production line. 
Fisker's failure comply led the DOE block access further funding, triggering layoff workers Fisker's Wilmington, Delaware manufacturing location and about engineers its Anaheim, California headquarters. The DOE has not said which milestones were missed. far, according report from the company, has received $193 million the total loan package from the DOE, much which went develop and commercialize the Karma, which began appearing late 2011. 

Fisker Renegotiate DOE Loan Page 
The Karma, able run 100 miles single gallon gasoline, could conceivably use 
only single tank fuel per year driven less than miles per day and plugged 
overnight, according company spokespersons. The Karma costs $87,900 before tax 

When Fisker moved into its Delaware 1131--a former General Motors facility rescued from Brownfield anonymity $11.7 million financial settlement with and retooling the assembly floor -company officials said the company would eventually producing 75,000 100,000 Nina-model vehicles 2014, from 
1141 and vendor and supplier staff 3,000. 
The Nina another hybrid electric motor with lithium-ion battery backup. When depleted, the car runs generator driven gasoline engine. The Nina's sticker price reported roughly (151 
Fisker, headquartered Anaheim, California, with one site Michigan, also received $13 million loan from the state Delaware, and million state grant startup, well $300 million venture capital from backers, one whom was A123 16J (Nasdaq: AONE), which was slated supply batteries for the Karma. 
Having failed meet requirements, the company now falls under Congressionalscrutiny triggered not merely missed milestones but also result several other DOE-funded clean energy company failures, notably 1n1 (solar panels), Beacon Power 11a1. (flywheel energy storage), and Ener1 Inc. 1191, supplier lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles. 
When Fisker first arrived the scene, was billed (and celebrated) job creator economy that had very recently seen the meltdown the Three auto makers 1201 the 
U.S. Chrysler and both took bailout; Ford slid cash reserves. result, Fisker's presumed failure reverberates through the halls Congress, wary lawmakers look over their shoulders for the next Solyndra and Judicial Watch files 1211 
under the Freedom Information Act access records related the DOE loan. 2/14/2012