Skip to content

Judicial Watch • JW v State Hillary BB NSA-IAD 00646 pg 10-11

JW v State Hillary BB NSA-IAD 00646 pg 10-11

JW v State Hillary BB NSA-IAD 00646 pg 10-11

Page 1: JW v State Hillary BB NSA-IAD 00646 pg 10-11

Category:

Number of Pages:2

Date Created:March 16, 2016

Date Uploaded to the Library:March 16, 2016

Tags:IAD, requirement, Discussion, BlackBerries, NSA, Secur, 00646, Wayne, chief, senior, hillary, AGENCY, Mills, Donald, unclassified, security, meeting, Secretary, State Department, FOIA, department


File Scanned for Malware

Donate now to keep these documents public!


See Generated Text   ∨

Autogenerated text from PDF

1ED
U.S. Department State Case No. F-2015-05028 Doc No. C05838717 Date: 02/05/2016
RELEASE PART BS, B(7)C,
8(3)50 USC 3605, Public Law
86-36, Sec. 6(a) National
Secur~ Act o_.!_!959
DS017jRELEASE INPART
(!!_{3)-18-USC 798, 8(1)
Reid, Donald
From:
Sent
To:
UNCLASSJFIE
Reid, Donald
Wednesday, February 18, 2009 8:53
0onovan. PatnCKO-
Cc:
Subject:
B7(C)
FW: Recap Meeting Blackberries
REVIEW AUTHORITY:- Barbara Nielsen, Senior
Reviewer
SECRET//NOFORN _j.the with
B7(C)
coordination and planning for yesterday meeting did not anticipate the need for S/EX representation ...this
Cheryl Mills that was prompted has raised host related issues..
discussion thA .catet1001..nL
j!hat and h.er staff .o..bJie.fed w.ittves
.to.travel aru1.tectm.oloa~ vulnerabilities? intends fol oW-Up this paftfcular
mistbt
___
More generally the issue Blad(berries the ahogany Row, will working with NSA set possible
options meet and others requirements... ther:e rtalnly will costs associated with anything that get Implemented ...
From:[=._ NATL SEC AGENCY
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 4:01
To: Ashbety, Wayne; Dinger, John Boswell,
Donovan, Patrlc:M>:mirver, Olarles Sta
cc:CSUtijed: Recap
B7(C) Gary A;, re: Bladcben1es R~~ .Donald R;_5tarr, Greg; 87(C) NATL SEC AGENCY! NATL SEC AGENCY
87(C)
Classification:~
B7(C)
ACTION:
SUMMARY:
-Premeetlng: the premeeting, attendee determined that not enough specifics were known about the
requirement jump right with discussion that Ms. Mills should Invited describe the requirement for the
group the start the meeting. addition, agreed that this was not decision meeting; rather, discussion
and Information gathering meeting enable eve one better understand the requirement, better understand
some the vulnerabilities, mitigations, costs (in rms functionality lost, time needed develop solutions, etc.)
associated with the requirement, and determi how move forward.
-Meeting: Ms. Mills described the require ent chiefly driven Secretary Ointon, who does not use standar
computer equipment but relies exduslvely her Blackberry for e-mailing and remaining contact her schedule,
~c. ldeiltv all members her suite would allo use Blackberries for communication the SCIF;
was not the primary driver, but sible would plus.
When tbuulnecabilitles were
Mills.ouicklv focused the main obstacle usirul BlackberriesJ
[=1
SCIFsJ
som;
._JFurther discussion ind.!_cated that
mitigations
veryrunctlonality desired
has w~ne5Sed u,. Blackberries other
sensttl )_1
USC 798,
(B)(3) P.l.
]86-36
__J
would remove the
jwhile others might take time develop. Ms. Mills
(but pe.p not SCIFed) spans
8(1),
(8)(3)-18
USC 798,
(8)(3)-P .L.
86-36
UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department State Case No. F-2015-05028 Doc No. C05838717 Date: 02/05/2016 7:1
U.S. Department State Case No. F-2015-05028 Doc No. C05838717 Date: 02/05/2016
Obtain
about what might possible and prudent. She
for her staff; however, use expanded unma
were phased out and Blackberry use was not alto
Ms. Mills asked about the Presidents Bia
she understands that she cannot given inform Judicial Watch, Inc. via FOIA
asked about precedent; former Secretary Rice had received waivers
geable number users from security perspective, those waivers her Suite.
berry and whether the ln~!fllatlon about that was compartmented;
ion about the speclficsr left out many details invite any you shar your perspective, your key takeaways, your different take the
meeting- ask any questions- important thi that everyone agree that captured the action and deliverable
accurately, and that everyone now know what requirement really have failed either those regards,
PLEASE NOT hesitate correct question
All the best, and thanks again all who partlclpa what believe was very productive and useful meeting the
minds. NATL SEC AGENcl
B7(C)
Attendees:
STATE DEPARTMENT:
hief, Vulnerability Analysis and Op83 NATL SEC AGENCY
Cheryl Mills, Chief Staff !Chief Systems Engineer, Systems Security
John DingerJcting A/S for INR
!Chief, Systems and Network Analysis Center (C)
hlef Information Officer -sNAC/Network Infrastructure
Charlie Wisecarver, Chief Technology Officer
Senior NSA Liaison Rep State Dept
Pat Donovan, DAS for OS/Countermeasures
Don Reid, Assistant Director for OS/Security lnfras
Wayne Ashbery, Director, Office Security Tech logy Director, Office Information Secur
87(C)
---~ NATL SEC AGENCY
B7(C) NATL SEC AGENCY
Senior NS.I Liaison Representative, U.S. State Oep rtment
commercial
--------------------------------
UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department State Case No. F-2015-05028 Doc No. C05838717 Date: 02/05/2016