Judicial Watch® Because no one is above the law!
Judicial Watch • Reply
Vining v Exec Board DC Health Benefit Exchange Def’s Reply 0006496
December 22, 2014
0006496, exchange, Exec, health, Reply, Supreme Court, Vining ...
Fast & Furious Reply
June 23, 2014
FOIA, Reply ...
city foia ii w deliv conf
April 1, 2013
CIA, mgton, PAGES, phone, Reply, review, thirds, uaunx, urgent, Watcli ...
JW v DHS Opinion
March 7, 2013
AGENCY, CIA, court, DHS, documents, EPA, Goldman, Houston, ICE, IRS ...
JW Reply Zero Dark Thirty
December 17, 2012
Advocates, CIA, Circuit, court, defendants, DOJ, DOMA, EPA, FBI, Fedeli ...
81046072 OBL Reply
February 8, 2012
al Qaeda, BENNETT, CIA, Civil, court, Culver, defendants, Defense, EPA, EXECUTIVE ...
JW v DOJ opinion 842011
August 4, 2011
Attorney, BLACK, Brinkmann, CIA, Civil, court, Division, documents, DOJ, EPA ...
Mckinley v Fdic Replysupport4cm4sj 05202011
May 20, 2011
CIA, court, documents, EPA, ICE, IRS, Judgment, Lacedra, motion, plaintiff ...
Jw v Fhfa Appellant Reply Brief 03212011
March 21, 2011
03212011, Appellant, Fhfa, Reply ...
Mckinley v Fhfa Repinsupportofcm4sj 02022011
February 2, 2011
AGENCY, CIA, court, decision, defendant, deliberative, department, document, documents, EPA ...
Sign Up for Updates!
Judicial Watch is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Contributions are received from individuals, foundations, and corporationsand are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law.