Judicial Watch® Because no one is above the law!
Judicial Watch • Respondents
North Carolina v NAACP SCOTUS 16-833
January 26, 2017
Electoral, turnout, effect, discriminatory, African, SCOTUS, Fourth, naacp, Respondents, Amici ...
North Carolina v NAACP SCOTUS appeal McCrory 16A168
December 19, 2016
McCrory, effect, discriminatory, Stay, Emergency, African, Fourth, naacp, Respondents, Americans ...
Akina v. Hawaii Motion for Civil Contempt 15A551
December 22, 2015
delegates, Contempt, Aupuni, Injunction, temporary, Akina, convention, Hawaiians, Respondents, applicants ...
Akina v Hawaii reply 15A551
November 27, 2015
Fifteenth, Aupuni, Injunction, Akina, Hawaiians, Respondents, applicants, hawaiian, Native, Ninth ...
Akina v. Hawaii SCOTUS emergency application 151108
November 23, 2015
151108, Aupuni, Emergency, Injunction, SCOTUS, Hawaiians, Respondents, applicants, hawaiian, Native ...
2015-06-22 Hawaii ORDER Granting Application Allowing Inspection of Public Recor ...
June 22, 2015
Allowing, Granting, inspection, applicant, Respondents, hawaiian, CLYDE, Native, application, Hawaii ...
REPLY to App to Allow Inspection of Public Records
May 29, 2015
Costa, Kanaiolowalu, LILLY, Sunshine, inspection, watchs, agenda, App, Hawaiians, Respondents ...
Amicus Brief Prop 8 2011
May 4, 2011
proponents, defend, proposition, Initiative, Respondents, governor, officials, rights, people, Plaintiffs ...
Amicus Brief Prop 8 Copy
Perry v Brown Prop8 Amicus 04172011
Perry v Brown Prop8 Amicus 05022011
Judicial Watch is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Contributions are received from individuals, foundations, and corporations and are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law.