Skip to content

Judicial Watch • Us v Arizona Rep in Support of Mot 2 Intervene 03072011

Us v Arizona Rep in Support of Mot 2 Intervene 03072011

Us v Arizona Rep in Support of Mot 2 Intervene 03072011

Page 1: Us v Arizona Rep in Support of Mot 2 Intervene 03072011

Category:General

Number of Pages:5

Date Created:March 17, 2011

Date Uploaded to the Library:February 20, 2014

Tags:Rep, Mot, 03072011, Intervene, support, arizona


File Scanned for Malware

Donate now to keep these documents public!

  • demand_answers

See Generated Text   ˅

Autogenerated text from PDF

I") 
,_J 
"'al 
.fl 
o'(! (ij ""'" 
!il  .S  
r.n 
I") 
' 

Case2:10-cv-01413-SRB Document 145 
Geoffrey Kercsmar (#20528) Gregory Collins (#023158) 
KERCSMAR FELTUS PLLC 
6263 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 320 Scottsdale, Arizona 85250 
Tel: (480) 421-1001 

Paul Orfancdcs 
(Motion for admission pro hac vice filed) James Peterson 
(Motion for admission pro hac vice filed) Michael Bekesha 
(Motion for admission pro hac vice filed) JUDrCTAL WATCH, INC. 
425 Third Street, S.W., Suite 800 Washington, 20024 
Tel: (202) 646-5172 
Attorneys for Proposed Intervenor/Defendant Arizona State Legislature THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT ARIZONA 
The United States America, 
Plaintiff, 
The State Arizona; and Janice Brewer, Governor the State Arizona, her Official Capacity, 
Defendants. 
Case No.: 2:10-cv-01413SRB 
REPLY SUPPORT MOTION THE ARIZONA ATE LEGISLATURE 
FOR INTERVENTION DEFENDANT 
(Oral Argument Requested) 
The Arizona State Legislature (''the Legislature"), counsel, respectfully submit'l this reply support its motion see ing leave intervene defendant pursuant Federal Rule Civil Procedure 24(b). grounds therefor, the Legislature states follows:
('I