<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Judicial Watch &#187; ACORN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/feed/?post_type%5B0%5D=post&#038;post_type%5B1%5D=press_release&#038;cat=586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.judicialwatch.org</link>
	<description>Because no one is above the law!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 16:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fla. Voter Registration Fraud Expands To 10 Counties</title>
		<link>http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2012/10/fla-voter-registration-fraud-expands-to-10-counties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2012/10/fla-voter-registration-fraud-expands-to-10-counties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 18:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Irene</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Election Integrity Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.judicialwatch.org/?p=14334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Illustrating that voter registration fraud is a bipartisan problem, a politically-connected vendor hired by the Republican Party to sign up new voters is under investigation for turning in suspicious forms with questionable information.   The scandal broke several weeks ago in south Florida’s Palm Beach County where the supervisor of elections set off a statewide<p><a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2012/10/fla-voter-registration-fraud-expands-to-10-counties/" class="more-link"><span>Read the full post</span></a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Illustrating that voter registration fraud is a bipartisan problem, a politically-connected vendor hired by the Republican Party to sign up new voters is under investigation for turning in suspicious forms with questionable information.  </p>
<p>The scandal broke several weeks ago in south Florida’s Palm Beach County where the supervisor of elections set off a statewide probe after discovering questionable forms coming from Strategic Allied Consulting, an Arizona-based firm. The Republican National Committee (RNC) has paid Strategic Allied Consulting $3 million to register new voters in several states, according to <a href="http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/news/national-govt-politics/voter-registration-fraud-probe-spreads/nSPYj/" target="_blank">news reports</a>, and Florida’s GOP has doled out an additional $1.3 million.</p>
<p>Now the number of counties in Florida, a key battleground state, that have reported questionable voter registration forms connected to the consulting firm has grown to 10. The tainted forms include discrepancies in addresses, signatures and other identifying information. The scandal has led the RNC and several of its state chapters to fire Strategic Allied Consulting, which is under investigation by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement.</p>
<p>One of Florida’s largest newspapers went so far as to compare this to the rampant, nationwide voter registration fraud caused by the “community group” ACORN during the 2008 presidential election (read all about that in a Judicial Watch <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/69315977/A-Judicial-Watch-Special-Report-The-Rebranding-of-Acorn" target="_blank">special report</a>). “Remember all that talk from Republicans about voter fraud?  Well, it ain’t just for ACORN anymore,” the paper’s political reporter writes in a <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/09/30/3027663/republicans-play-defense-over.html#storylink=misearch" target="_blank">story</a> published over the weekend. .   </p>
<p>Though any allegation of voter fraud is serious and must be thoroughly investigated by authorities, it seems a bit premature to compare this to the massive ACORN scandal that rocked the last presidential election. Seventy ACORN employees in 12 states have been convicted of voter registration fraud and a congressional report revealed that more than one-third of the 1.3 million registrants submitted by the group in the 2008 election cycle were invalid.</p>
<p>Whether the fraud is tied to Republicans or Democrats, Judicial Watch is monitoring this closely through its <a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/2012-election-integrity-project-judicial-watch-announces-legal-campaign-to-force-clean-up-of-voter-registration-rolls/" target="_blank">2012 Election Integrity Project </a>to assure that voter rolls are as clean as required by federal law. Through publicly available data, JW has already discovered that voter rolls in several states—including Mississippi, Iowa, Indiana, Missouri, Texas, Florida, Alabama, California and Colorado—contain the names of individuals who are not eligible to vote.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2012/10/fla-voter-registration-fraud-expands-to-10-counties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACORN Brass, Union Organizers Divide $10 Mil Retirement Fund</title>
		<link>http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2012/09/acorn-brass-union-organizers-divide-10-mil-retirement-fund/</link>
		<comments>http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2012/09/acorn-brass-union-organizers-divide-10-mil-retirement-fund/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Irene</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.judicialwatch.org/?p=14222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Embroiled in a multitude of corruption scandals, the “defunct” Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) has liquidated and distributed to its cronies millions of dollars from in an in-house retirement fund at the center of a major embezzlement scheme. The recent payout was discovered in the course of Judicial Watch’s ongoing investigation of<p><a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2012/09/acorn-brass-union-organizers-divide-10-mil-retirement-fund/" class="more-link"><span>Read the full post</span></a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Embroiled in a multitude of corruption scandals, the “defunct” Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) has liquidated and distributed to its cronies millions of dollars from in an in-house retirement fund at the center of a major embezzlement scheme.</p>
<p>The recent payout was discovered in the course of Judicial Watch’s ongoing investigation of the Obama-tied community organization that operated fraudulent voter registration drives during the 2008 presidential campaign. Last year JW published a special report <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/69315977/A-Judicial-Watch-Special-Report-The-Rebranding-of-Acorn" target="_blank">(“The Rebranding of ACORN”) </a>outlining ACORN’s illegal activities, including its involvement in the housing market meltdown.</p>
<p>ACORN members also embezzled at least  <a href="http://nlpc.org/stories/2009/10/06/acorn-embezzlement-totaled-5-million-internal-audit-asserts" target="_blank">$5 million </a>under the helm of founder Wade Rathke and his brother, Dale Rathke, the group’s former chief financial officer. In fact, Dale got busted for stealing $1 million from ACORN in 2000 and the money came mostly from the nonprofit’s in-house retirement fund, known as the ACORN Beneficial Association (ABA). ACORN executives <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/09/us/09embezzle.html" target="_blank">kept the crime </a>from board members and law enforcement, according to media reports.</p>
<p>Last month the ABA liquidated and distributed more than <a href="http://chieforganizer.org/2012/08/17/pay-day-for-acorn-veterans-and-perhaps-for-acorn-workers-scammed-by-giles-o’keef/" target="_blank">$10 million </a>in assets to ACORN veterans and union organizers, JW’s probe found. ACORN founder Wade Rathke actually brags about it on his <a href="http://chieforganizer.org/2012/08/17/pay-day-for-acorn-veterans-and-perhaps-for-acorn-workers-scammed-by-giles-o’keef/" target="_blank">blog,</a> where he writes: “For some of the people who I hired in the early 70’s who logged in 10, 20, and even 30 years working with me, these transfers are serious money in the six figures. A couple of my long time union organizers with Local 100 are looking at enough money to think about trying to buy houses for the first time, retire debts, and put aside savings.” </p>
<p>This is a disgrace considering that, despite a myriad of legal scandals, ACORN for years enjoyed a huge flow of taxpayer dollars to promote its various leftwing causes. Congress could no longer ignore the issue and finally passed a <a href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h3571/show" target="_blank">law</a> in 2009 banning federal funding for the Chicago-based community activist organization. The measure specifically prohibits any federal contract, grant, cooperative agreement or other form of agreement from being awarded to any ACORN affiliate or associate.</p>
<p>The Obama Administration has still managed to slip its various spinoffs some cash, however. Last year JW uncovered documents that show an ACORN reincarnation called Affordable Housing Centers of America (AHCOA) got a <a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/06/jw-probe-obama-s-hud-violates-acorn-funding-ban/" target="_blank">$79,819 grant </a>to “combat housing and lending discrimination.” The money came via the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as part of a $40 million effort to educate the public and combat discrimination.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2012/09/acorn-brass-union-organizers-divide-10-mil-retirement-fund/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indicted Senator Ran On ACORN, Union Ticket</title>
		<link>http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2012/09/indicted-senator-ran-on-acorn-union-ticket/</link>
		<comments>http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2012/09/indicted-senator-ran-on-acorn-union-ticket/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Irene</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.judicialwatch.org/?p=14154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judicial Watch has uncovered an interesting twist—unlikely to get any mainstream media coverage—involving the New York state senator who just got charged for stealing taxpayer money earmarked to help the needy. Known as an advocate of education equality for poor minorities, Democrat Shirley Huntley got hauled away in handcuffs last week and slapped with a<p><a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2012/09/indicted-senator-ran-on-acorn-union-ticket/" class="more-link"><span>Read the full post</span></a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judicial Watch has uncovered an interesting twist—unlikely to get any mainstream media coverage—involving the New York state senator who just got charged for stealing taxpayer money earmarked to help the needy.</p>
<p>Known as an advocate of education equality for poor minorities, Democrat Shirley Huntley got <a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2012/08/n-y-senator-hauled-away-in-cuffs-charged-with-20-counts/" target="_blank">hauled away in handcuffs </a>last week and slapped with a 20-count indictment that includes felonies such as tampering with evidence and falsifying business records. Huntley stole nearly $30,000 she steered to a fake charity that claimed to help poor parents navigate the city’s school system, according to the indictment.</p>
<p>The 74-year-old state senator named her sham nonprofit Parent Workshop, according to the New York Attorney General’s office.  The fake charity claimed to help low-income folks deal with the city’s huge and complicated public school system. Instead, authorities say, the money was pocketed by Huntley’s niece, who served as the group’s treasurer, and another man, who is listed as president. </p>
<p>It turns out that Huntley ran for office on both the Democratic and <a href="http://www.workingfamiliesparty.org/about/who-we-are/" target="_blank">Working Families Party</a> (WFP) tickets, according to New York State <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/104542986/2010-Senate-Amended-01272011" target="_blank">election results </a>reviewed by Judicial Watch. This is relevant because the WFP has very close ties to the famously corrupt nonprofit with close ties to President Obama, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN). In fact, JW found that the WFP shares office space in Brooklyn with two ACORN spinoffs, New York Communities for Change (NYCC) and the Mutual Housing Association of New York. </p>
<p>When ACORN finally got busted for fraud, Congress cut its federal funding (<a href=" http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h3571/show" target="_blank">Defund ACORN Act</a>) and the group simply rebranded, creating a series of spinoffs operated by the same crooked people. Read all about it in a Judicial Watch <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/69315977/A-Judicial-Watch-Special-Report-The-Rebranding-of-Acorn" target="_blank">special report </a>born out of an extensive investigation that tracked the group and its affiliated organizations throughout the United States. The probe also revealed that tens of millions of dollars in ACORN’s funds and other assets are still unaccounted for.</p>
<p>Additionally, Huntley’s WFP is essentially a political operation of various unions, including the Service Employees International Union (SEIU).  In fact, the WFP was co-founded by Patrick Gaspard, the SEIU’s political vice president before moving on the White House and the Democratic National Committee, former ACORN chairwoman Bertha Lewis and two other union bigwigs. Between 2006 and 2010, the SEIU gave $29,000 to Sen. Huntley’s campaign, JW’s probe found.</p>
<p>Here’s an interesting side note on the indicted state senator; in a show of solidarity with a black juvenile delinquent shot in Florida by a Hispanic man after an altercation, Huntley posted an <a href="http://www.nysenate.gov/photos/2012/mar/26/3262012-i-am-trayvon-martin" target="_blank">amusing photo </a>of herself on her official government website. She appears in a hooded sweatshirt, similar to the one worn by the teen, who had been suspended from school, when he got shot. In the caption, Senator Huntley claims “I am Trayvon Martin.”   </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2012/09/indicted-senator-ran-on-acorn-union-ticket/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Records Obtained by Judicial Watch Show Obama White House Coordination with Department of Justice on Voting Rights Enforcement</title>
		<link>http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/new-records-obtained-by-judicial-watch-show-obama-white-house-coordination-with-department-of-justice-on-voting-rights-enforcement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/new-records-obtained-by-judicial-watch-show-obama-white-house-coordination-with-department-of-justice-on-voting-rights-enforcement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin-</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.judicialwatch.org/?post_type=press_release&#038;p=12178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ACORN Partner Project Vote Working with Officials from White House and DOJ to Use National Voting Rights Act to Increase Registration of Voters on Public Assistance Interest Group Urges Justice Official to “make some headway” with Attorney General Holder (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch, the organization that investigates and fights government corruption, announced today that...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><strong><em>ACORN Partner Project Vote Working with Officials from White House and DOJ to Use National Voting Rights Act to Increase Registration of Voters on Public Assistance</em></strong></p>
<p align="center"><strong><em>Interest Group Urges Justice Official to “make some headway” with Attorney General Holder</em></strong></p>
<p><strong>(Washington, DC)</strong> – Judicial Watch, the organization that investigates and fights government corruption, announced today that it has received additional documents about meetings held between Estelle Rogers, Director of Advocacy for the ACORN-affiliated organization Project Vote, and officials from the Obama White House and the Department of Justice (DOJ). Judicial Watch is investigating the extent to which Project Vote, which once employed Barack Obama, has been working with the Obama administration to use voter registration laws to register greater numbers of low-income voters, widely considered to be an important voting demographic for the Obama presidential campaign.</p>
<p>The additional documents, provided in response to a FOIA lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch on August 19, 2011, detail email communications between Rogers and high ranking officials from the Obama White House and DOJ. The following are highlights from the records:</p>
<ul>
<li>On April 27, 2009, Estelle Rogers <a href="http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/78686468?access_key=key-8ne92ihua0qh8jr0oj7&amp;start_page=14">wrote</a> to Deputy Assistant Attorney General Sam Hirsh regarding an upcoming meeting on April 30, 2009. In addition to Rogers and Hirsh, other  attendees included: Nicole Kovite, Director of Public Agency Project for Project Vote; Spencer Overton, Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Office of Legal Policy; and two officials from the Obama White House: Celia Muñoz, then-Director of Intergovernmental Affairs and recently promoted to Director of the Domestic Policy Council; and Tino Cuellar, Special Assistant to the President for Justice and Regulatory Policy.</li>
</ul>
<blockquote><p>In her email, Rogers references documents she forwarded in preparation for the upcoming meeting on the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), to which Hirsch replies that he looks forward to “reading these materials” and to “seeing everyone on Thursday.”</p></blockquote>
<ul>
<li>On February 23, 2011, Rogers <a href="http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/78686468?access_key=key-8ne92ihua0qh8jr0oj7&amp;start_page=3">wrote</a> to Associate Deputy Attorney General Robert Weiner, asking him to “make some headway with Attorney General [Eric] Holder in enforcing Section 7 of the NVRA.” The email notes that the DOJ had not yet filed any Section 7 lawsuits, which Rogers dubbed “deeply disappointing.”  The first such DOJ lawsuit (against Rhode Island) was filed on March 18, 2011, less than one month later. Of particular note, is Rogers’ comment that “We have received oral assurances from [Assistant Attorney General Thomas] Perez on several occasions that enforcement action was imminent,” suggesting that Rogers was privy to internal discussions inside the DOJ regarding pending legal action.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>On March 29, 2011, Rogers <a href="http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/78686468?access_key=key-8ne92ihua0qh8jr0oj7&amp;start_page=13">wrote</a> to Associate Attorney General [Thomas] Perrelli, urging him to review and “make improvements” to a document she was sending following another meeting held on March 17, 2011 between Project Vote and the DOJ on Section 7 compliance with the NRVA.  Accompanying the document was a previous letter she had sent to the Civil Rights Division plus “additional comments on the Q and A.”</li>
</ul>
<p>On December 14, 2011, Judicial Watch <a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/new-documents-show-department-of-justice-coordination-with-acorn-connected-project-vote/">released a separate batch of documents</a> which also detail the partnership between the Obama DOJ and Project Vote.</p>
<p>As Director of Advocacy for Project Vote, Estelle Rogers ‒ a former attorney for ACORN, which was besieged with charges of corruption before declaring bankruptcy in November 2010 ‒ is a primary contact person on policy matters at Project Vote on both state and federal levels and has been actively involved in voter registration issues. Using the threat of a lawsuit under the NVRA, Project Vote has aggressively sought to manipulate voter registration laws in various states to increase the registration of people receiving public assistance.</p>
<p>On August 4, 2011, Judicial Watch <a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/documents-acorn-and-project-vote-activity-led-to-dramatic-increase-in-invalid-colorado-voter-registrations-for-2008-and-2010/">released documents obtained from the Colorado Department of State</a> showing that ACORN and Project Vote successfully pressured Colorado officials into implementing new policies for increasing the registration of public assistance recipients during the 2008 and 2010 election seasons. Following the policy changes, the percentage of invalid voter registration forms from Colorado public assistance agencies was four times the national average. Project Vote also sought a “legislative fix” to allow people without a driver’s license or state identification to register to vote online.</p>
<p>In addition to pursuing public agency registration cases in Missouri, Ohio, Indiana, Georgia and New Mexico, Project Vote and the NAACP filed a lawsuit on April 19, 2011, against the State of Louisiana alleging violations of the NVRA. Less than three months later, on July 12, the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division/Voting Section sued Louisiana on the same grounds, claiming that “Louisiana officials have not routinely offered voter registration forms, assistance and services to the state’s eligible citizens who apply, recertify or provide a change address for public assistance or disability services.”</p>
<p>The DOJ’s March 11, 2011, lawsuit against Rhode Island led to policy changes intended to increase the number of voter registration applications processed by “public assistance and disability service officers.” These two lawsuits, filed within five months of each other, are the first such lawsuits filed by the DOJ since 2007.</p>
<p>Project Vote and ACORN have both been linked to massive voter registration fraud. A total of 70 ACORN employees in 12 states have been convicted of voter registration fraud. And as documented in a July 2009 report by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, of the 1.3 million registrations Project Vote/ACORN submitted in the 2008 election cycle, more than one-third were invalid.</p>
<p>“These documents raise fundamental questions about the politicization of the Justice Department under Eric Holder and demonstrate that the ACORN-connected Project Vote is throwing its weight around the Justice Department and driving the agency’s voting rights agenda. And evidently the Obama White House is now directly implicated in this growing scandal,” said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch. “It is now clear that Project Vote and the Obama/Holder Justice Department are conspiring to file Justice Department lawsuits to help re-elect Barack Obama. This collusion between Project Vote and the Obama administration is a significant threat to the integrity of the 2012 elections. To have Project Vote involved in the Justice voting rights enforcement is like having the Mafia run the FBI.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/new-records-obtained-by-judicial-watch-show-obama-white-house-coordination-with-department-of-justice-on-voting-rights-enforcement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACORN Got DOJ Grant To Combat Juvenile Delinquency</title>
		<link>http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/12/acorn-got-doj-grant-combat-juvenile-delinquency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/12/acorn-got-doj-grant-combat-juvenile-delinquency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin-</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Justice Department program that annually distributes hundreds of millions of dollars to combat juvenile delinquency is under fire for giving a famously corrupt leftist group—Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN)—money that was fraudulently spent. It marks the latest of several controversies for the DOJ’s Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) which<p><a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/12/acorn-got-doj-grant-combat-juvenile-delinquency/" class="more-link"><span>Read the full post</span></a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Justice Department program that annually distributes <a href="http://www.ojjdp.gov/funding/fy11awards.html">hundreds of millions of dollars </a>to combat juvenile delinquency is under fire for giving a famously corrupt leftist group—Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN)—money that was fraudulently spent.</p>
<p>It marks the latest of several controversies for the DOJ’s Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) which has managed to maintain a copious budget through the years despite multiple allegations of cronyism. During the George W. Bush Administration, the OJJDP was accused of giving <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5033256&amp;page=1#.TteOEYRaQ4I">money to politically-connected groups</a> that didn’t necessarily meet the agency’s goals.</p>
<p>This week the DOJ Inspector General released a <a href="http://www.justice.gov/oig/grants/2011/g7012002.pdf">report</a> that exposes corruption surrounding a $138,130 grant that OJJDP awarded to an ACORN branch in New York City. The audit found that there were internal control weaknesses, unsupported grant expenditures, lack of contractor monitoring, weaknesses in budget management, inadequate grant reporting, unmet conditions and deficiencies with the program’s overall performance.</p>
<p>The IG also describes the New York group as a “pass-through entity” for ACORN, the crooked nonprofit that’s raked in huge sums of taxpayer dollars over the years. In 2009 Congress actually passed a law (<a href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h3571/show">Defund ACORN Act</a>) to ban federal funding for ACORN after a series of exposés about the group’s illegal activities, which include fraudulent voter registration drives and involvement in the housing market meltdown. The group also has close ties to President Barack Obama.</p>
<p>Earlier this year a <a href="https://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/jun/obama-s-hud-violates-acorn-funding-ban">Judicial Watch probe</a> found that the Obama Administration violated the ban on federal funding for ACORN by giving the beleaguered group nearly $80,000 to “combat housing and lending discrimination” against minorities. After sorting through droves of government records, Judicial Watch investigators discovered that an ACORN affiliate in New Orleans, ACORN Housing Corporation Inc., got $79,819 as part of a larger $40 million allocation to “fair housing organizations” that educate the public and combat discrimination.</p>
<p>This year Judicial Watch also published a special report (<a href="https://www.judicialwatch.org/files/documents/2011/acornspecialreport08222011.pdf">“The Rebranding of ACORN”</a>) about the organization’s transformation into various spinoffs and affiliated groups. Amid a massive fraud scandal and a series of criminal probes, ACORN supposedly dismantled but the reality is that it simply changed its name. For instance, under the rebranding <a href="https://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/oct/acorn-behind-occupy-wall-street-protest">New England United 4 Justice</a>, ACORN has been one of the driving forces behind the movement to end economic segregation and social injustice in the U.S. (Occupy Wall Street).</p>
<p><a href="https://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/oct/acorn-behind-occupy-wall-street-protest"></a></p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/12/acorn-got-doj-grant-combat-juvenile-delinquency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACORN Behind Occupy Wall Street Protest</title>
		<link>http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/10/acorn-behind-occupy-wall-street-protest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/10/acorn-behind-occupy-wall-street-protest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 15:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>akajas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.judicialwatch.org/?p=641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A famously corrupt leftist community organization with deep ties to President Barack Obama is largely behind the national movement to “end economic segregation” and social injustice in the United States.Best known as Occupy Wall Street, the rowdy protests have received quite a bit of mainstream media coverage around the world. Besides New York, disruptive marches have been<p><a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/10/acorn-behind-occupy-wall-street-protest/" class="more-link"><span>Read the full post</span></a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A famously corrupt leftist community organization with deep ties to President Barack Obama is largely behind the national movement to <a href="http://massuniting.org/files/2011/09/PAY-BACK-TIME-Foreclosed-Families-to-March-on-Bank-of-America-Friday-with-1000-supporters.pdf">“end economic segregation”</a> and social injustice in the United States.Best known as Occupy Wall Street, the rowdy protests have received quite a bit of mainstream media coverage around the world. Besides New York, disruptive marches have been held in other major U.S. cities such as Los Angeles, Seattle, Miami and Boston and more are scheduled in the coming days.Among the goals is to get major banks to <a href="http://massuniting.org/files/2011/09/PAY-BACK-TIME-Foreclosed-Families-to-March-on-Bank-of-America-Friday-with-1000-supporters.pdf">stop preying on the poor and people of color</a>, according to the organizer of a Boston offshoot of an Occupy Wall Street rally. The event, promoted as Take Back Boston, was organized by dozens of local community groups that claim big banks have a pattern of pushing “bad loans on people of color and the poor.” As a result of the “predatory lending,” foreclosures have skyrocketed in urban communities, the organizers say.Among the Take Back Boston organizers is a spinoff of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN). Amid a massive fraud scandal and a series of criminal probes, ACORN supposedly dismantled but the reality is that it simply changed its name. In fact, Judicial Watch recently published a special report<a href="https://www.judicialwatch.org/files/documents/2011/acornspecialreport08222011.pdf">(“The Rebranding of ACORN”</a>) about the organization’s transformation into various spinoffs and affiliated groups.In this particular case, ACORN’s Boston office simply rebranded into <a href="http://www.neunited4justice.org/">New England United 4 Justice</a>. Same crooked group with the same general mission and president, but a different name. Headed by Maude Hurd, the former president of ACORN and ACORN Housing, New England United 4 Justice promotes “social justice” for “low and moderate income families.” The group also seeks to educate the general public about social justice issues and the needs of poor and middle class families.This sort of rebranding has allowed ACORN to skirt a 2009 congressional ban on federal funding, consequence of its many transgressions. A few months ago a Judicial Watch investigation found the Obama Administration gave an ACORN reincarnation called Affordable Housing Centers of America (AHCOA) a <a href="https://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/jun/obama-s-hud-violates-acorn-funding-ban">$79,819 grant</a> to “combat housing and lending discrimination.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/10/acorn-behind-occupy-wall-street-protest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judicial Watch Releases Special Report:  “The Rebranding of ACORN”</title>
		<link>http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-releases-special-report-%e2%80%9cthe-rebranding-of-acorn%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-releases-special-report-%e2%80%9cthe-rebranding-of-acorn%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin-</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.judicialwatch.org/?post_type=press_release&#038;p=556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scandal-Ridden Activist Group Lives on in the Form of “Bullet Proof Community-Organizing Frankensteins” Created Across the Country (Washington, DC) &#8211; Judicial Watch, the public interest organization that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today released “The Rebranding of ACORN,” a special report on the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) network, following an extensive...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><strong><em>Scandal-Ridden Activist Group Lives on in the Form of “Bullet Proof Community-Organizing Frankensteins” Created Across the Country<br />
</em></strong></p>
<p><strong>(Washington, DC) &#8211;</strong> Judicial Watch, the public interest organization that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today released “<a href="http://www.scribd.com/JWatchDC/d/69315977-A-Judicial-Watch-Special-Report-The-Rebranding-of-Acorn" target="_blank">The Rebranding of ACORN</a>,” a special report on the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) network, following an extensive investigation of the organization’s transformation into various “spinoffs” and affiliated organizations.</p>
<p>The ACORN-affiliated groups existing today are ACORN in all but name. These groups tend to occupy ACORN’s former offices, are staffed in many cases with former ACORN employees, and remain committed to ACORN’s mission. Judicial Watch has documented 17 ACORN-affiliated organizations in the following states/regions:  Arizona, Arkansas, California, District of Columbia, Florida, Louisiana, Minnesota, Missouri, New England, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington.</p>
<p>Among the conclusions of Judicial Watch’s<a href="http://www.scribd.com/JWatchDC/d/69315977-A-Judicial-Watch-Special-Report-The-Rebranding-of-Acorn" target="_blank"> <span class="scribd">special report</span></a>:</p>
<ul>
<li>ACORN lives on in the form of numerous state entities and in such affiliated organizations as Affordable Housing Centers of America (AHCOA), The Advance Group, The Black Institute, and Project Vote.  In the words of Bertha Lewis, former chief executive officer of ACORN, “… these entities are carrying on ACORN’s work of organizing low- and moderate-income folks…  [We have created] bullet-proof community-organizing Frankensteins that they’re going to have a very hard time attacking.”</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Tens of millions of dollars in ACORN’s funds and other assets are still unaccounted for.  The Louisiana attorney general’s office and the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, as well as Judicial Watch, continue to investigate what happened to these missing resources.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Judicial Watch discovered that the Obama administration continues to bankroll ACORN and its affiliates in defiance of the federal government’s funding ban.  For example, on March 1, 2011, ACORN Housing Corporation ─ renamed Affordable Housing Centers of America (though it retained the same headquarters and many of the ACORN officers) ─ received a $79,819 grant from the Obama Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>ACORN’s Project Vote, President Obama’s former employer, remains active in trying to register a “Food Stamp Army” of voters on public assistance to re-elect Obama and other leftist candidates.  In Colorado, for instance, Judicial Watch uncovered documents proving that ACORN/Project Vote successfully pressured Colorado officials into implementing new policies for increasing the registration of public assistance recipients during the 2008 and 2010 election seasons.  After the policy changes, <em>the percentage of fraudulent voter registration forms from Colorado public assistance agencies was  four times the national average</em>.  Evidence suggests the Obama Justice Department might be partnering with Project Vote in this campaign.</li>
</ul>
<p>At its peak, ACORN had over 400,000 members and 1,200 chapters in more 100 cities.  Linked to serious scandals involving misuse of taxpayer funds, embezzlement, intimidation tactics, employee abuse, questionable hiring tactics, and fraudulent voter registrations, ACORN’s corrupt activities finally caught the attention of the American public and members of Congress, the final blow coming after explosive journalist videos were released showing ACORN employees advising undercover reporters on how to evade taxes, as well as immigration, housing, and child prostitution laws.</p>
<p>After the videos “went viral,” in October 2009, Congress passed and President Obama signed into law the <a href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h3571/show">Defund ACORN Act</a> which effectively prohibited the federal government from funding “ACORN and any ACORN-related affiliate.”  ACORN subsequently filed for bankruptcy on November 2, 2010.   Long before its bankruptcy filing, however, ACORN’s leadership implemented a plan to ensure the survival of ACORN as independent state corporations and affiliated organizations.  The Judicial Watch report provides details on the individual organizations and their officers.</p>
<p>“As this report clearly shows, rumors of ACORN’s demise are vastly overstated.  The ACORN network, especially its partner in crime Project Vote, is alive and well and operating across the country,” said Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton.  “The Obama, administration, sure enough, has begun funding the ACORN housing group in violation of the law.  We fear a taxpayer-funded repeat of the ACORN/Project Vote voter registration scandal in 2012.”</p>
<p>Barack Obama served as the Illinois executive director of the ACORN partner Project Vote in 1992. His campaign paid more than $800,000 to an ACORN organization to help “get out the vote” in his successful primary campaign against then-Sen. Hillary Clinton in 2008.  In November 2007, then-Senator Obama addressed ACORN and thanked the organization for its work: “I&#8217;ve been fighting alongside ACORN on issues you care about my entire career. Even before I was an elected official, when I ran Project Vote voter registration drive in Illinois, ACORN was smack dab in the middle of it, and we appreciate your work.”</p>
<p>“Barack Obama is truly ‘the president from ACORN,’” added Tom Fitton.</p>
<p><em>To review the comprehensive report by Judicial Watch entitled “The Rebranding of ACORN,” please visit <a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org">www.judicialwatch.org</a>.  </em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p align="center">###</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-releases-special-report-%e2%80%9cthe-rebranding-of-acorn%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judicial Watch Sues for Communications between Obama DOJ and Project Vote Official, Former ACORN Attorney Estelle Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-sues-for-communications-between-obama-doj-and-project-vote-official-former-acorn-attorney-estelle-rogers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-sues-for-communications-between-obama-doj-and-project-vote-official-former-acorn-attorney-estelle-rogers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 20:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin-</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.judicialwatch.org/?post_type=press_release&#038;p=576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the Justice Department Partnering with Scandal-plagued Project Vote ? Contact Information: Press Office 202-646-5172, ext 305g Washington, DC &#8212; August 24, 2011 Judicial Watch, the organization that investigates and fights government corruption, announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit on August 19, 2011, against the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3 style="text-align: center;"><em>Is the Justice Department Partnering with Scandal-plagued Project Vote ?</em></h3>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Contact Information:</strong><br />
Press Office 202-646-5172, ext 305g</p>
<div><strong>Washington, DC &#8212; August 24, 2011</strong></div>
<p></p>
<div><strong></strong>Judicial Watch, the organization that investigates and fights government corruption, announced today that it <a class="scribd" href="http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/69493872?access_key=key-1axhzkc5htzh7i9m5l08">filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit</a> on August 19, 2011, against the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to obtain records related to the agency’s communications with Estelle Rogers, a former ACORN attorney currently serving as Director of Advocacy for the ACORN-connected organization Project Vote, President Obama’s former employer (<em>Judicial Watch v. Department of Justice</em> (No. 11-1497)). Judicial Watch is investigating the extent to which the DOJ and Project Vote are partnering on a national campaign to use the National Voting Rights Act (NVRA) to register more individuals on public assistance, widely considered a key voting demographic for the Obama 2012 campaign.</div>
<div>Pursuant to a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed on June 23, 2011, Judicial Watch seeks the following: “All records of communications between the Department of Justice and Estelle Rogers, Director of Advocacy for Project Vote. The timeframe for this request is January 2, 2009, to June 23, 2011.”According to federal law, the DOJ was required to respond to Judicial Watch’s June 23, 2011, FOIA request within 30 working days, or by August 5, 2011. U.S. Postal Service records indicate the DOJ received Judicial Watch’s request on June 28, 2011. As of the lawsuit’s filing, the DOJ has failed to produce the records requested or respond with a date they will be forthcoming.As Director of Advocacy for Project Vote, Estelle Rogers – a former attorney for ACORN, which was besieged with charges of corruption before declaring bankruptcy in November 2010 – is a primary contact person on policy matters at Project Vote on both state and federal levels and has been actively involved in voter registration issues. By threatening lawsuits under Section 7 of the NVRA, Project Vote has aggressively sought to force election officials in various states to increase the registration of people receiving public assistance. (Under Section 7, states are required to offer voter registration services at all public assistance agencies, including unemployment offices and food stamp offices.)On August 4, 2011, Judicial Watch <a href="https://www.judicialwatch.org/story/2011/aug/acorn-and-project-vote-activity-colorado">released documents</a> obtained from the Colorado Department of State showing that ACORN and Project Vote successfully pressured Colorado officials into implementing new policies for increasing the registration of public assistance recipients during the 2008 and 2010 election seasons. Following the policy changes, the percentage of invalid voter registration forms from Colorado public assistance agencies was four times the national average. Project Vote also sought a “legislative fix” to allow people without a driver’s license or state identification to register to vote online.Project Vote and the “community organization” ACORN have both been linked to serious incidents of voter registration fraud. In fact, Project Vote’s “Field Director,” Amy Busefink, who handled the online registration campaign for Colorado, entered an Alford plea to two gross misdemeanor counts of conspiracy to commit the crime of compensation for registration of voters in Nevada while working for ACORN. (An Alford plea is a guilty plea, where the defendant does not admit the act or assert innocence, but admits that sufficient evidence exists with which the prosecution could likely convince a judge or jury to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.)In addition to pursuing public agency registration cases in Missouri, Ohio, Indiana, Georgia and New Mexico, Project Vote also filed a lawsuit on April 19, 2011, in partnership with the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), against the State of Louisiana alleging violations of the NVRA. Less than three months later, on July 12, the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division/Voting Section sued Louisiana on the same grounds, claiming that “Louisiana officials have not routinely offered voter registration forms, assistance and services to the state’s eligible citizens who apply, recertify or provide a change address for public assistance or disability services.”The DOJ sued the State of Rhode Island on March 11, 2011, alleging violations of the NVRA. The lawsuit led to policy changes intended to increase the number of voter registration applications processed by “public assistance and disability service officers.” These two lawsuits, filed within five months of each other, are the first such lawsuits filed by the DOJ since 2007.Barack Obama has deep connections to Project Vote. He served as the Illinois Executive Director of Project Vote in 1992. His campaign paid more than $800,000 to an ACORN organization to help “get out the vote” in his successful primary campaign against then-Sen. Hillary Clinton.“Judicial Watch is convinced that Project Vote’s activities remain a threat to the integrity of our elections. The fact that Project Vote is bullying states to attack election security reforms in order to register Obama’s ‘Food Stamp Army’ comes as no surprise. But it appears that the Obama Justice Department is using the same playbook as Project Vote – to the detriment of clean elections. The American people deserve to know if the nation’s highest law enforcement agency has become nothing more than a political tool to help this scandalous ACORN-front group re-elect Barack Obama. Again, this Justice Department can’t seem to be bothered to comply with basic open records FOIA law,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-sues-for-communications-between-obama-doj-and-project-vote-official-former-acorn-attorney-estelle-rogers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Documents: ACORN and Project Vote Activity Led to Dramatic Increase in Invalid Colorado Voter Registrations for 2008 and 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/documents-acorn-and-project-vote-activity-led-to-dramatic-increase-in-invalid-colorado-voter-registrations-for-2008-and-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/documents-acorn-and-project-vote-activity-led-to-dramatic-increase-in-invalid-colorado-voter-registrations-for-2008-and-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin-</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.judicialwatch.org/?post_type=press_release&#038;p=585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ContentsDocuments UncoveredPercentage of Invalid Voter Registrations from Public Assistance Agencies in Colorado More Than Four Times the National Average in 2009-2010; Sought “Legislative Fix” to allow People without a Driver’s License or State Identification to Register to Vote Online Contact Information: Press Office 202-646-5172, ext 305 Washington, DC &#8212; August 4, 2011 Judicial Watch, the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mwm-aal-container"><div class='mwm-aal-title'>Contents</div><ol><li><a href="#documents-uncovered">Documents Uncovered</a></li></ol></div><h3 style="text-align: center;"><em>Percentage of Invalid Voter Registrations from Public Assistance Agencies in Colorado More Than Four Times the National Average in 2009-2010; Sought “Legislative Fix” to allow People without a Driver’s License or State Identification to Register to Vote Online</em></h3>
<p><strong>Contact Information:</strong><br />
Press Office 202-646-5172, ext 305</p>
<div><strong>Washington, DC &#8212; August 4, 2011</strong></div>
<p>Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it uncovered documents from the Colorado Department of State showing that ACORN and its affiliate, Project Vote, successfully pressured Colorado officials to implement new policies for increasing the registration of public assistance recipients during the 2008 and 2010 election seasons. Following the policy changes, the percentage of invalid voter registration forms from Colorado public assistance agencies was four times the national average.</p>
<div>The documents, obtained pursuant to a June 8, 2011, Colorado Open Records Act request to the Colorado Office of the Secretary of State, include approximately 400 internal emails. They relate to a complaint by ACORN and Project Vote that the state of Colorado was in violation of Section 7 of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). Under Section 7, states are required to offer voter registration services at all public assistance agencies, including unemployment offices and food stamp offices.As a result of this collaboration between ACORN, Project Vote and Colorado officials, the number of voter registrations at Colorado public assistance agencies <a href="https://www.judicialwatch.org/files/documents/2011/co-nvra-report-0311.pdf">rose from 3,340 in 2007 to almost 44,000 in 2010</a>. (In a February 15, 2011,<a href="https://www.judicialwatch.org/files/documents/2011/co-project-vote-docs-2.pdf#page=78">email to Project Vote</a>, Christi Heppard, Special Projects Coordinator for the Elections Division of the Colorado Department of State, wrote, “…I think you will be pleasantly surprised by the numbers.”) However, the collaboration also led to a large number of invalid and duplicate voter registrations. A total of 8% of rejected registration forms came from public assistance agencies in Colorado in 2009-2010. This is <a href="http://www.eac.gov/assets/1/Documents/2010%20NVRA%20FINAL%20REPORT.pdf">more than four times the national average of 1.9%</a> for that same time period.According to the documents, Amy Busefink, who at the time was under indictment on 13 voter registration violation charges in Nevada stemming from her time as regional deputy director for ACORN, later managed the online program for Project Vote nationally, including Colorado.In a May 14, 2008, <a href="https://www.judicialwatch.org/files/documents/2011/co-project-vote-docs-4.pdf#page=11">“pre-litigation” letter</a>, ACORN and Project Vote complained to the State of Colorado that it was in violation of the NVRA, and subsequently set up a meeting with Colorado officials to discuss the matter. According to<a href="https://www.judicialwatch.org/files/documents/2011/co-project-vote-docs-2.pdf#page=159">the documents</a>, that meeting took place on July 2, 2008, at ACORN’s offices. On June 9, 2009, not satisfied with Colorado’s response, Project Vote election counsel Donald Wine II <a href="https://www.judicialwatch.org/files/documents/2011/co-project-vote-docs-1.pdf#page=139">threatened litigation</a>: “CDHS [Colorado Department of Human Services] has had a year and a half to comply with the NVRA. We are left with no choice but to prepare for litigation.”In response to this threat, the Colorado Office of the Secretary of State evidently went to extreme measures to accommodate ACORN and Project Vote’s demands, including:</p>
<ul>
<li>Offering to help push a “legislative fix” to allow people without a driver’s license or state identification to register to vote online. According to a January 27, 2010, <a href="https://www.judicialwatch.org/files/documents/2011/co-project-vote-docs-4.pdf#page=104">email from Director of Division of Elections Judd Choate</a>, “The Secretary’s office would support such a fix. We just need a legislator on board and begin the process of drafting the bill.”</li>
<li>Sending <a href="https://www.judicialwatch.org/files/documents/2011/co-project-vote-docs-1.pdf#page=89">spreadsheets of voter registration data</a> to Project Vote on a bi-weekly basis for more than two years.</li>
<li>Posting a <a href="https://www.judicialwatch.org/files/documents/2011/co-project-vote-docs-2.pdf#page=137">Project Vote-produced presentation</a> on the Colorado Secretary of State website.</li>
<li>Hosting <a href="https://www.judicialwatch.org/files/documents/2011/co-project-vote-docs-5.pdf#page=63">several meetings</a> between Project Vote personnel and representatives of state welfare offices.</li>
<li>Ensuring that <a href="https://www.judicialwatch.org/files/documents/2011/co-project-vote-docs-1.pdf#page=144">changes to voter registration forms were approved by Project Vote</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>Project Vote’s Busefink ultimately entered an Alford plea to two gross misdemeanor counts of conspiracy to commit the crime of compensation for registration of voters. (An Alford plea is a guilty plea, where the defendant does not admit the act and asserts innocence, but admits that sufficient evidence exists with which the prosecution could likely convince a judge or jury to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.)Democrat Bernie Buescher, who served as Colorado Secretary of State from January 2009 through January 2011, received support from the Secretary of State Project, an organization funded in part by liberal financier George Soros and organized by the leftist group Moveon.org. (In April 2010, <a href="http://www.coloradostatesman.com/content/991749-voting-bill-ignites-capitol-firestorm">Buescher campaigned with former State House Speaker Terrance Carroll</a> for a proposed bill that would have implemented universal mail-in balloting, same-day voter registrations and pre-registration of 16 year olds. Facing stiff opposition from county election clerks, the bill was tabled on April 21, 2010.)According to the documents, while Colorado officials took measures to satisfy the demands of Project Vote related to the registration of public assistance recipients, Buescher <a href="https://www.judicialwatch.org/files/documents/2011/co-move-act-waiver-request.pdf">sought a waiver</a> from the Obama administration that would allow a delay in sending out ballots in time for the military to vote in the last election. The Department of Defense<a href="https://www.judicialwatch.org/files/documents/2011/co-move-act-waiver-denial.pdf">rejected</a> the request.“The ACORN/Project Vote gang has not gone away, and continues to help generate fraudulent voter registrations that can lead to voter fraud. These emails clearly demonstrate that the corrupt organization ACORN/Project Vote had an inappropriate level of influence over the electoral process in Colorado,” said Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton. “Colorado officials bent over backwards to abide by the demands of ACORN/Project Vote, which an activist facing criminal charges helped run. So it comes as no surprise that there was a sharp increase in voter registration irregularities. And it is shameful that the concern for voting rights of the citizens of Colorado did not apparently extend to military personnel in the state. If we’re going to protect the integrity of the 2012 elections, attention must be paid to the continuing nefarious activities of ACORN/Project Vote.”</p>
<a name="documents-uncovered"></a><h4>Documents Uncovered</h4>
<ul class="scribd">
<li><a href="http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/69636430?access_key=key-1ioehvkzkuodvv1q6r0d">Colorado NVRA Report, March 2011</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/69636468?access_key=key-1itb1rcv2b3lvmrhv20r">Colorado Project Vote Documents, part 1</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/69636501?access_key=key-2dck3lr0yalwn6bkos1r">Colorado Project Vote Documents, part 2</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/69636519?access_key=key-f96512znb95w1cm4k8e">Colorado Project Vote Documents, part 3</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/69636541?access_key=key-tgns1qty1ll7c5mueaq">Colorado Project Vote Documents, part 4</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/69636570?access_key=key-1dxblg6tryxdmh7uf31d">Colorado Project Vote Documents, part 5</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/69636583?access_key=key-1tmqalglr48fgjl0jmzc">Colorado Project Vote Documents, part 6</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/69636427?access_key=key-2luvwvivo6ldgeuhlbyd">Colorado MOVE Waiver Request</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/69636420?access_key=key-8i0t032hpccdsree6qf">Colorado MOVE Waiver Denial</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/documents-acorn-and-project-vote-activity-led-to-dramatic-increase-in-invalid-colorado-voter-registrations-for-2008-and-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Administration Issues $79,819 Grant to ACORN Offshoot in Apparent Violation of ACORN Funding Ban</title>
		<link>http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/obama-administration-issues-79819-grant-to-acorn-offshoot-in-apparent-violation-of-acorn-funding-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/obama-administration-issues-79819-grant-to-acorn-offshoot-in-apparent-violation-of-acorn-funding-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 19:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin-</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.judicialwatch.org/?post_type=press_release&#038;p=656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Grant Recipient, Affordable Housing Centers of America, Criticized in 2010 Inspector General Report for Misappropriating Federal Funds Contact Information: Press Office 202-646-5172, ext 305 Washington, DC &#8212; July 5, 2011 Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that that the Obama Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3 style="text-align: center;"><em>Grant Recipient, Affordable Housing Centers of America, Criticized in 2010 Inspector General Report for Misappropriating Federal Funds</em></h3>
<p><strong>Contact Information:</strong><br />
Press Office 202-646-5172, ext 305</p>
<div><strong>Washington, DC &#8212; July 5, 2011</strong></div>
</p>
<div><strong></strong>Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that that the Obama Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has issued a $79,819 grant to the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN)-offshoot Affordable Housing Centers of America (AHCOA) in apparent violation of an ACORN funding ban passed by Congress and signed into law by President Obama in 2009. Moreover, this grant was provided to the organization less than a year after ACORN/AHCOA was criticized by HUD’s inspector general in two separate investigations for misappropriating funds from federal grants.</div>
<div>On October 1, 2009, President Obama signed into law legislation known as the <a href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h3571/show" target="_blank">Defund ACORN Act</a> that effectively prohibited the federal government from funding “ACORN and any ACORN-related affiliate.” Following a lawsuit filed by ACORN challenging the law, which passed both branches of Congress by wide margins, the federal courts in New York upheld the constitutionality of the funding ban on August 13, 2010. The Supreme Court last month refused to hear ACORN’s appeal of this funding ban.But a Judicial Watch investigation revealed that, on March 1, 2011, <a href="http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/press/press_releases_media_advisories/2011/HUDNo.11-023">HUD announced</a> a $79,819 federal grant to AHCOA to “educate the public and housing providers about their rights and obligations under federal, state, and local fair housing laws.”Although the Government Accountability Office issued a controversial advisory opinion in September 2010 stating that AHCOA is a separate entity from ACORN and is therefore not subject to the funding ban, the <a href="https://www.judicialwatch.org/files/documents/2011/hud-grant-acorn-screenshot-2011.pdf">government’s website</a> listing federal expenditures identifies the organization receiving the $79,819 grant as “ACORN Housing Corporation Inc,” and lists ACORN’s New Orleans, Louisiana, address. Moreover AHCOA maintains the same board of directors, executive director and offices as its predecessor, ACORN Housing Corporation, Inc.Federal investigators have documented fraudulent activity on the part of ACORN Housing/AHCOA. For example, according to a <a class="scribd" href="http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/69772581?access_key=key-1od0lq5o1iorw1b7304r" target="_blank">September 21, 2010</a>, HUD inspector general report, which notes that ACORN Housing is “now operating as Affordable Housing Centers of America,” the organization misappropriated funds from a $3,252,399 federal grant. The inspector general concluded that ACORN Housing/AHCOA had charged salary expenses to the HUD grant that “were not fully supported.” The organization also continued to pay its counselors even after they were terminated, did not meet federal procurement standards and allegedly destroyed documents to conceal the fraudulent activity.The inspector general articulated a number of benchmarks that must first be met by AHCOA before the organization could begin receiving any future federal funds, including reimbursing the government the misappropriated funds.A separate <a class="scribd" href="http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/69772558?access_key=key-13c56pt7tugcnco5tgrv" target="_blank">November 8, 2010</a>, HUD inspector general report documented additional fraudulent activity by ACORN/AHCOA. The ACORN group “inappropriately expended more than $3.2 million from its fiscal years 2004 and 2005 grants for the elimination of lead poisoning in its housing program,” the report concluded. The misappropriation included the use of funds “not identified in its grant application’s detailed budgets,” including “campaign services” and “grant fundraising activities.”In November 2007, then-Senator Obama addressed ACORN and thanked the organization for its work. While Obama has denied that he had any involvement with ACORN other than some legal work he did for them in 1995, his statements in 2007 suggest otherwise. In <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121807650916419499.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Senator Obama’s own words</a>, “I&#8217;ve been fighting alongside Acorn [sic] on issues you care about my entire career. Even before I was an elected official, when I ran Project Vote voter registration drive in Illinois, Acorn [sic] was smack dab in the middle of it, and we appreciate your work.” Barack Obama served as the Illinois executive director of Project Vote in 1992. His campaign <a href="http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/election/s_584284.html">paid more than $800,000</a> to an ACORN organization to help “get out the vote” in his successful primary campaign against then-Sen. Hillary Clinton.<em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/16/us/politics/16acorn.html">The New York Times</a></em> reported in 2009 that “perhaps no administration official has had more interaction with Acorn [sic] than [Shaun] Donovan”, who is Obama’s Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. The <em>Times</em> notes that Donovan “worked closely” with ACORN’s politically-powerful New York housing affiliate when he was a New York City housing official.“President Obama is truly the president from ACORN. So it is no surprise that his administration would continue to dole out tax dollars to an ACORN affiliate with a documented history of fraudulent activity,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “This is another instance of President Obama’s appointees stubbornly refusing to follow the law and deny this crooked organization funds. Is the Obama gang ensuring that ACORN is around to help them again in 2012?”(This year, HUD provided $40 million in grants to 108 “fair housing” organizations, representing a $13.2 million increase over the 2010 award. According to HUD’s press announcement, the general purpose of these grants is “<a href="http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/press/press_releases_media_advisories/2011/HUDNo.11-023">to educate the public and combat housing and lending discrimination</a>.”)</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/obama-administration-issues-79819-grant-to-acorn-offshoot-in-apparent-violation-of-acorn-funding-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>