No Review For Mexicans On Death Row

Comments

Wed, 03/26/2008 - 7:51am — anonymous (not verified)

HOORAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Its

HOORAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Its about time that George W Bush be told to shut up and butt out. The man is a menace and completely on the payroll of Mexico.

Fry this Jose Medellin--now!

Fri, 03/28/2008 - 4:35pm — Simon (not verified)

Many Thanks! to our American Suprem courts

Many Thanks! to our American Suprem courts FOR DOING THERE JOB! I'm sure that every State and county across America already have Laws on there books to take care of Rape charges! Prez Bush has been catering to Mexico's Government for a while,and I wonder why he would get involved with known DRUG DEALERS??? allso Prez Bush has EXCEEDED HIS AUTHORITY (IN MANY OTHER INSTANCES)???

Fri, 03/28/2008 - 11:13pm — John Gregory Norris (not verified)

I was slightly relieved that

I was slightly relieved that we could find at least a partial ounce of justice still available in this "new world order" with it's "new world servers". Our government has been hijacked any way you want to cut it. This active coup de tat has to be opposed, violently if necassary. I'm preparing, are you?

Fri, 03/28/2008 - 11:43pm — Anonymous (not verified)

The right call for now...

I believe Chief Justice John Roberts made the correct call about our temporary national sovereignty. President Bush jumped the gun in this regard because technically, the complete, final surrender of the United States to Mexican illegal alien criminals isn't scheduled until sometime after John McCain's inauguration next January. Congress will have to pass the Kennedy/McCain Illegal Alien Amnesty Bill, setting out the exact terms of our surrender to Mexico, before former sovereign states like Texas are legally required to obey the whims of Mexican President Felipe Calderon. Until then, Texas can still execute scum like Jose Medellin, but they should hurry up and do so. Under Mexican law, raping and murdering American citizens is not considered a serious offense. I understand that John McCain is hoping to land a cabinet post Felipe Calderon's government and has strong support among the Mexican criminal community for his promises of $50/hr lettuce picking jobs for unskilled Mexicans.

Tue, 08/05/2008 - 1:13am — lisa (not verified)

illigal mexicans

Just think, if we had a President that would enforce the laws of the United States of America, that would see to it that the American people were protected from the illigal criminal element from other countries (Mexico), maybe there wouldn't be so many dead and maimed American citizens. How many years will it take us to get over Bush and his stupid open door policy towards illigal Mexicans?

Fri, 08/08/2008 - 3:53pm — Steven Belsky (not verified)

I AM ASHAMED OF US (U.S.) not texas

This was a court order BY A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION (They have the right to make the order)

WE DID

=============================

http://fletcher.tufts.edu/multi/texts/BH444.txt

VIENNA CONVENTION ON CONSULAR RELATIONS AND OPTIONAL PROTOCOLS

DONE AT VIENNA, ON 24 APRIL 1963
Article 36
COMMUNICATION AND CONTACT WITH NATIONALS OF THE SENDING STATE

1. With a view to facilitating the exercise of consular functions relating
to nationals of the sending State:

(a) consular officers shall be free to communicate with nationals of the
sending State and to have access to them. Nationals of the sending
State shall have the same freedom with respect to communication with
and access to consular officers of the sending State;

(b) if he so requests, the competent authorities of the receiving State
shall, without delay, inform the consular post of the sending State
if, within its consular district, a national of that State is
arrested or committed to prison or to custody pending trial or is
detained in any other manner. Any communication addressed to the
consular post by the person arrested, in prison, custody or detention
shall also be forwarded by the said authorities without delay. The
said authorities shall inform the person concerned without delay of
his rights under this sub-paragraph;

(c) consular officers shall have the right to visit a national of the
sending State who is in prison, custody or detention, to converse and
correspond with him and to arrange for his legal representation. They
shall also have the right to visit any national of the sending State
who is in prison, custody or detention in their district in pursuance
of a judgment. Nevertheless, consular officers shall refrain from
taking action on behalf of a national who is in prison, custody or
detention if he expressly opposes such action.

2. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be exercised
in conformity with the laws and regulations of the receiving State, subject
to the proviso, however, that the said laws and regulations must enable
full effect to be given to the purposes for which the rights accorded under
this Article are intended.

==================================

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_Consular_Relations

In March 2005, the United States pulled out of the Optional Protocol to the Convention, which allows the International Court of Justice to have compulsory jurisdiction over disputes arising under the Convention.

==================================

NOTE: I AM LAWYER I AM TALKING LOGICAL NOT LEGALLY

IT IS AS IF A U.S STATE SAID THAT THE U.S. SUPREME DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION.

I CONSIDER IT WRONG. WE SHOULD BE BOUND TO THE COURT FOR ANY TREATIES (WHICH MEANS MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL (CITIES, COUNTIES, STATES, COUNTRIES) THAT WE ARE A PARTY TO.

It is that or risk a r m e d conflict.
=================================