During the presidential campaigning, it had been said that if McCain were elected, it would be a third-term Bush presidency.
With all the corruption in the soon-to-be presidency of B.O., his term in office can only be described as the third-term of scandal-ridden Bill Clinton.
Let us remember that Rahm Emmanuel was the go-to guy (not goy) when Clinton needed cover during the Monica Lewinsky debacle. When Emmanuel couldn't keep the scandal under wraps any longer, he went into finger pointing mode to try and minimize and/or marginalize it.
B.O. should get rid of Rahm Emmanuel ASAP if he wants to keep any credibility about his impending presidency .
The question is: Will America be able to withstand Marxist B.O. and his agenda of "socialist change" until the next presidential election?
May God richly bless Judicial Watch for exposing the truth about corruption in our government!
"Barack Obama’s chief of staff was recorded discussing Illinois’ vacant Senate seat with the state’s indicted governor 21 times, even though the president elect assures his staff did nothing wrong in the bribery scandal that has rocked the nation."
For one thing, the Chicago Sun Times did not say where they got copies of any of the tapes, or even that they did get copies. They have produced absolutely no evidence that they did.
"To prove it, Obama conducted a thorough internal review which, for unknown reasons, can’t be released until Christmas week when few pay attention to the news."
Unknown reasons?? How about that the Prosecutor asked them to delay it?
Just from reading this one story (and it is just a story) it's pretty clear that none of you writing for this website have any clue as to what constitutes evidence or what slander is.
You have stated no facts to back up the points that you try to make in this story. Yet, you write as though Obama and Emanuel have conclusively done something wrong.
That is not unbiased, it is not anything other than slander. Period.
Now, if you have actual facts that back this story up, why haven't you printed it?
Judicial Watch on Twitter
Judicial Watch on Facebook
Judicial Watch on YouTube
Judicial Watch RSS
Subscribe via RSS
Comments
3rd Term Clinton Presidency
During the presidential campaigning, it had been said that if McCain were elected, it would be a third-term Bush presidency.
With all the corruption in the soon-to-be presidency of B.O., his term in office can only be described as the third-term of scandal-ridden Bill Clinton.
Let us remember that Rahm Emmanuel was the go-to guy (not goy) when Clinton needed cover during the Monica Lewinsky debacle. When Emmanuel couldn't keep the scandal under wraps any longer, he went into finger pointing mode to try and minimize and/or marginalize it.
B.O. should get rid of Rahm Emmanuel ASAP if he wants to keep any credibility about his impending presidency .
The question is: Will America be able to withstand Marxist B.O. and his agenda of "socialist change" until the next presidential election?
May God richly bless Judicial Watch for exposing the truth about corruption in our government!
Emanuel, Blagojevich Talk Senate 21 Times - NOT!
"Barack Obama’s chief of staff was recorded discussing Illinois’ vacant Senate seat with the state’s indicted governor 21 times, even though the president elect assures his staff did nothing wrong in the bribery scandal that has rocked the nation."
For one thing, the Chicago Sun Times did not say where they got copies of any of the tapes, or even that they did get copies. They have produced absolutely no evidence that they did.
"To prove it, Obama conducted a thorough internal review which, for unknown reasons, can’t be released until Christmas week when few pay attention to the news."
Unknown reasons?? How about that the Prosecutor asked them to delay it?
Just from reading this one story (and it is just a story) it's pretty clear that none of you writing for this website have any clue as to what constitutes evidence or what slander is.
You have stated no facts to back up the points that you try to make in this story. Yet, you write as though Obama and Emanuel have conclusively done something wrong.
That is not unbiased, it is not anything other than slander. Period.
Now, if you have actual facts that back this story up, why haven't you printed it?