Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Press Releases

Judicial Watch Statement on SCOTUS Ruling in Texas Department of Housing v. Inclusive Communities Project

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the following statement in response to the Supreme Court’s ruling today in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, et al. v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., in which it upheld a federal Fair Housing Act (FHA) interpretation that imposes liability on a state housing decision that disparately impacts certain minorities, despite the absence of evidence of any discriminatory intent:

Today’s Supreme Court “disparate impact” decision in the case of Texas Department of Housing v. Inclusive Communities Project is confused and, as the Court did in its Burwell decision, endorses the Executive Branch’s radical racial rewrite of our federal housing law.  The Obama administration unlawfully changed federal housing anti-discrimination law to prohibit practices that result in a disparate impact on minorities.  In fact, the law prohibits actions only taken because of race, not actions that happen to disproportionately impact certain races.  Unfortunately, this judicial activist decision further enshrines the intellectually impoverished concept of race into the law, it furthers a culture of racial and ethnic politics in American public life, and perpetuates racial and ethnic resentment and intolerance in American society.  In fact, the only way to treat the troubled concept of “race” in the law should be to absolutely prohibit its use as a basis for making decisions affecting individuals or groups.  Conveniently, such a prohibition is precisely what the Constitution already requires.  And, as Judicial Watch has alleged and as Justice Thomas implies in his dissent, the Obama administration corruptly influenced the Supreme Court’s consideration of this issue and has tainted today’s ruling.

###


Related

Merchan backtracks, but lawfare still deployed against Trump

In The News | September 20, 2024
Tom Fitton in Washington Times: Several days ago, America was on the brink of chaos. On September 18, Donald J. Trump was scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Juan Merchan in New Yor...

Terrorists Use Weapons Left by U.S. in Afghanistan to Attack Civilians, Police in Pakistan

Corruption Chronicles | September 19, 2024
Sophisticated weapons and other military equipment left behind by U.S. troops during the 2021 Afghanistan withdrawal are being used by Islamic terrorists in Pakistan’s largest prov...

Plaintiffs Seek to Keep Reparations Suit Alive

In The News | September 18, 2024
From Evanston Now: The initial lawsuit was filed in May by Judicial Watch, a conservative legal action group, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Judi...