In 1998, the state of California took over funding of all state trial court operations, including responsibility for payment of salaries and benefits to trial court judges. Los Angeles County, which is home to one of the largest trial court systems in the United States, continues to pay "local judicial benefits" to its judges to supplement the compensation and benefits they received from the state. This "double dipping" by trial court judges costs Los Angeles County taxpayers an estimated $20 million per year. In the spring of 2006, Judicial Watch filed a "citizen-taxpayer" lawsuit against the county seeking to have these payments declared unlawful and to enjoin future payments.
Following the trial court's ruling upholding the payments, Judicial Watch appealed, and on October 10, 2008, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District Division One, reversed the ruling of the trial court and remanded the case.
In July 2009, the trial court again upheld the payments, but Judicial Watch provided a Notice of Appeal on September 28, 2009.
While Judicial Watch firmly believes that all judges should be adequately and fairly compensated for their very important work, such compensation must be paid in strict accordance with the law. The case demonstrates Judicial Watch's continuing efforts to promote integrity in the judicial system and commitment to the rule of law.
COURT DOCUMENTS
- Original Complaint - April 24, 2006
- Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment
- Declaration in Support of Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment
- Appendix of Authorities in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment
- Response to Material Facts
- Request for Notice
- Order Granting Motion for Summary Judgment - January 9, 2007
- Notice of Appeal - February 7, 2007
- Appellant's Opening Brief
- Appellant's Reply Brief - October 4, 2007
- Appellate Court Ruling - October 10, 2008
- Answer to Petition for Review - December 10, 2008
- Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment - April 21, 2009
- Plaintiff's Statement of Material Facts - April 21, 2009
- Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment - June 5, 2009
- Plaintiff's Opposition to Intervenor's Motion for Summary Judgment - June 5, 2009
- Plaintiff's Reply to Defendants' Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment - June 15, 2009
- Plaintiff's Reply to Intervenor's Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment - June 15, 2009
- Order Granting Motions for Summary Judgment - August 20, 2009
- Notice of Appeal - September 28, 2009
PRESS RELEASES
- California Court of Appeal Rules that Extra Compensation for Los Angeles County Judges Violates California Constitution - October 15, 2008
- Judicial Watch Files Lawsuit Against Los Angeles County for Allowing Judges to "Double-Dip" on Benefits, Perks - Apr 24, 2006










Subscribe via RSS