Skip to content

Get Judicial Watch Updates!

DONATE

Judicial Watch • JW v DOJ FISA response 01050

JW v DOJ FISA response 01050

JW v DOJ FISA response 01050

Page 1: JW v DOJ FISA response 01050

Category:

Number of Pages:2

Date Created:June 18, 2018

Date Uploaded to the Library:June 28, 2018

Tags:01050, flynn, FISA, Marshall, DOJ, FOIA


File Scanned for Malware

Donate now to keep these documents public!


See Generated Text   ∨

Autogenerated text from PDF

Us. Department Justice
National Security Division
Washington, DC. 20530
William Marshall Re: FOIA/PA 18-221
425 Third St. SW. Suite 800
Washington, 20024
iiriiiimimiingi viii/liter. lune2018
Dear Mr. Marshall:
This our final response your FOIA (FOIA)/Privncy Act (PA) request dated February
16, 2018 requesting, [ajnyand all transcripts hearings before the brer Intelligence
Surveillance Court regarding applications/or renewals ofForeig/z Intelligence Surveillance
Act (NSA warrants relaling Carter Page and/0r Mic/me] Flynn Our 1101A
received your Freedom otIniormation request June 2018.
For your information. Congress excluded three discrete categories law enforcement
and national security records from the requirements ofthe OIA. See use. 552m (2006
Supp. (2010). This response limited those records that are subject the requirements
the FOIA. This standard noti cation that given all our iequcsters and should not
taken indication that excluded records do, not, exist.
The National Security Division (NSD) maintains operational les which document
requests and approvals from the Foreign intelligence Surveillance Court authority for the
US. Intelligence Community conduct certain foreign intelligence activities. not search these records response requests regarding the use non-use
such techniques cases where the con rmation denial the existence responsive records
would. and itselt reveal information properly classi under Executive Order 13526.
con deny the existence such materials each case would tend reveal properly
classrlrcd information regarding whether particular surveillance techniques have have not
been used the U.S. intelligence Community. Accordingly, with respect your request
relating Michael Flynn, can neither con nor deny the existence records these les
responsive your request pursuant U.S.C. 552(b)(1).
Based declassi cation decisions the President and the Intelligence Community,
however, are able respond your request relating Carter Page, search NSD
records did not identify any records responsive your request. ibis request litigation) are emitting standard administrative appeal
paragraph.
Sincerely,
Kevin Tiernan
Rocorda and 01A Unit