Fast-Paced, Hard-Hitting Judicial Watch Clinton Scandals Panel Video Now Available Here — Judicial Watch Clinton scandals panel discussion was forthright, candid – at times scathing – and entirely captivating throughout.I have attached a video of the entire presentation…Since, however, it is 90 minutes….http://jwatch.us/FJeAzQ
U.S. Intel Alert: Climate Change Aids Terrorists, Destabilizes Entire World, Stresses Military — Climate change poses significant national security challenges for the United States and will create large-scale political instability, social disruption and food shortages, according to the nation’s intelligence agency…http://jwatch.us/wGMfMG
DHS Agency That Enforces Immigration Law Honors Open Borders Activist Who Helps Illegal Aliens — The Homeland Security agency responsible for enforcing the nation’s immigration laws is honoring a renowned open-borders activist dedicated to defending illegal aliens in the U.S. with….http://jwatch.us/um3Md6
Dreadlock Ban Isn’t Discrimination; Court Rejects Govt. Claim of “Racial Distinctions in the Natural Texture of Black and Non-Black Hair” — A federal appellate court has ruled against the Obama administration’s claims that firing a black woman for wearing dreadlocks constitutes racial discrimination…http://jwatch.us/Ux5EqX
Keep our investigators on the job uncovering the truth:
>> add an extra contribution right now? <<
James Comey sparks debate over FBI integrity of Clinton probe — “Did the FBI give Hillary a pass? Insight from Judicial Watch’s TOM FITTON on Justice with Judge Jeanine” …http://bit.ly/2dHoaQl
TOURIST TRAP — “President Obama, the Ultimate Tourist, Ticks Down His Bucket List” — “Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group, has used Freedom of Information requests and lawsuits to try to get information about the cost of the president’s travel. The group claims that Mr. Obama’s travel, official and personal, has cost taxpayers about $80 million”…http://nyti.ms/2dDxNLA
OBAMA TARGETS JUDICIAL WATCH — “Political operatives within the Obama administration wrongly punished conservative legal group Judicial Watch, stripping it of “media” status and trying to force it to pay higher fees for its open records requests, the General Services Administration inspector general said in a letter released Thursday. The GSA botched several high-profile open records requests, delaying them for months while political appointees got involved, Inspector General Carol F. Ochoa said. The findings were released while the administration was facing charges of slow-walking open records requests for Hillary Clinton’s emails, as well as other requests. In the case of Judicial Watch, the order to strip it of media status came from political operatives with long ties to Democratic causes — and even from the White House”…http://bit.ly/2dfh2H0
An excerpt from our “Clinton Email Scandal & the Clinton Foundation” panel transcript
CHRIS FARRELL: “…I think everyone needs to appreciate that Mrs. Clinton was the subject of a national security crime investigation. This wasn’t a security review. It wasn’t an argument over classification levels. This was a violation of Title 18 of the U.S. Code, Section 793F, mishandling national defense information. And contrary to what the American public has been told repeatedly, intent is not an element of the crime. There’s no requirement to prove any sort of intent at all. And so, when Mr. Comey talks about intent or he wasn’t able to prove it or there’s no sort of specification that showed an intent, it’s a red herring. It’s a false argument. It isn’t a requirement of the crime.
So we know from the inspector general of the intelligence community that 22 top secret SCI, which is sensitive compartmented information. It’s a special category of intelligence collection – 22 top secret SCI messages or e-mails went across Mrs. Clinton’s unsecured server. It’s a fact. It’s a finding of the inspector general. That’s the root of the referral to the Department of Justice that caused them to begin this inquiry.
The fact that that has occurred puts the United States at grave risk. That’s the definition really for compromising top secret material. That is the issue that is really the focal point of what the FBI should have been looking at. And it’s a yes or no question. It’s not, what did you intend? It’s not how did you feel about it. It’s not what were you really trying to accomplish. It’s a yes or no question. Did this event occur? Yes or no. And if it did occur, who is responsible for it? What is the proximate cause of this event occurring? And if you walk it back to find the person who made it happen, that’s who’s prosecuted. And this whole intent thing is nonsense. Mr. Comey is lying to the American public when he goes down that path…”