Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Corruption Chronicles

Turk Gave Terrorists Material Support Under “Duress,” May Get U.S. Asylum

A Turkish man denied U.S. asylum after repeatedly furnishing terrorists with “material support” may be eligible to stay in the country after all under a “duress exception,” a federal appellate court has ruled.

The incredible case comes out of New York where the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit overturned an immigration judge’s ruling denying asylum. The decision was subsequently confirmed by the Board of Immigration Appeals, the nation’s highest administrative body for interpreting and applying immigration laws.

Immigration officials found that the Turkish man, Ramazan Ay, was ineligible for asylum after determining that he provided armed Kurdish terrorists from the Kurdistan Workers’ Party with food and clothing on at least four occasions. This is considered material support and an immigration judge agreed with the feds, denying Ay’s asylum request. The Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed the judge’s decision and Ay appealed to the 2nd Circuit in Manhattan.

In a disturbing ruling issued this week, a three-judge panel bought Ay’s argument that he only provided the terrorists support under duress, because he was forced to. Ay also claims that he didn’t really know the armed radicals he fed and clothed were actually terrorists. The federal appellate court believed that explanation as well, therefore determining that Ay may be eligible for asylum under a duress exception to those found guilty of supporting terrorists.

The appellate panel compared this to a 2009 case in which the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the government’s refusal to give an Eritrean immigrant asylum because he persecuted people in his native country. Evidently, the man claimed he persecuted others involuntarily, or under duress, and federal authorities failed to take that into consideration. That would essentially change the material support argument because presumably it wasn’t voluntary.

The 2nd Circuit ruling comes on the heels of a preposterous Obama administration order allowing the U.S. to take in once-banned refugees and asylum seekers who have provided “limited material support” to terrorists. The policy reverses the nation’s zero tolerance for any sort of terrorism-related support and changes a law (Immigration and Nationality Act) passed by Congress decades ago to govern immigration and citizenship in the United States.

Showing “duress” is not necessary under the new policy, though it can’t hurt. The new exemptions will grant asylum to individuals who provided small or in inconsequential amounts of support to terrorism without the intent to further any terrorist or violent activities. This includes individuals who, in the ordinary course of business transactions or social interactions, incidentally provided support with no intent of abetting violent or terrorist activity. It also covers humanitarian assistance and support for terrorists “under significant pressure that does not quite rise to the level of duress.”

 

 

 

 

 


Related

Mexican Cartels Dictate Flow of Nearly all Illicit Drugs into the U.S., DEA Confirms

Corruption Chronicles | May 23, 2024
In addition to record-breaking numbers of illegal immigrants hemorrhaging into the United States through Mexico, cartels in the Latin American border nation have caused the worst d...

Holding Biden accountable for his border crimes

In The News | May 22, 2024
From Washington Times: Under Mr. Biden, human beings are broken daily on the hard, sharp edge of the U.S.-Mexico border. Borders are often dangerous places, and this is Mr. Biden’s...

Judicial Watch Asks Minnesota Supreme Court to Allow Taxpayer Lawsuit over Racially Discriminatory Minneapolis…

Press Releases | May 22, 2024
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it filed a brief in the Minnesota Supreme Court asking it to affirm a state Appeals Court decision allowing its taxpayer lawsuit ...