Skip to content

Judicial Watch • Maryland redistricting

Judicial Watch Files Amicus Brief Asking Supreme Court To Require Fourth Circuit to Follow Three-Judge Court Act in Maryland Gerrymandering Challenge

PRESS RELEASE

Judicial Watch Files Amicus Brief Asking Supreme Court To Require Fourth Circuit to Follow Three-Judge Court Act in Maryland Gerrymandering Challenge

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed an amicus curiae brief with the U.S. Supreme Court asking the court to affirm the Three-Judge Court Act, a law requiring three federal judges to be empaneled to hear key federal lawsuits concerning redistricting, voting rights, and other key constitutional…

WEEKLY UPDATE

Supreme Court Misrule

Supreme Court Undermines the Republic Judicial Watch Files Suit to End Gerrymandering in Maryland, Protect Constitution Obama Peddles Global Warming Fantasies, Attacks Political Opponents at Taxpayer Expense Supreme Court Undermines the Republic The whole idea behind lifetime appointments to the highest court in the land is to provide justices with…

PRESS RELEASE

Judicial Watch Files Voter Lawsuit Challenging Constitutionality of Maryland Gerrymandering Plan

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a voter lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Maryland’s gerrymandered congressional district maps.  The lawsuit was filed on behalf of voters in each of Maryland’s congressional districts.  Plaintiffs in the new lawsuit include Maryland Delegates Neil C. Parrott and Matt Morgan,…

PRESS RELEASE

Press Conference: Judicial Watch Lawsuit to End Gerrymandering

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced it will host a press conference at the National Press Club on Wednesday, June 24 to announce a new federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of congressional districts in Maryland. The lawsuit, to be filed on Wednesday, will propose a straightforward method to allow courts…

PRESS RELEASE

Judicial Watch Statement on Supreme Court’s Decision to Grant Certiorari in Shapiro v. Mack

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the following statement in response to the Supreme Court’s decision Monday to grant certiorari to the plaintiffs in Shapiro et al. v. Mack et al., which challenges Maryland’s 2011 legislative redistricting plan on the grounds that it violates the voting rights of Maryland citizens…


Sign Up for Updates!

Jill Farrell
Director of Public Affairs
(202) 646-5172 (x305)
(202) 646-5188
media/at/judicialwatch.org

(202) 646-5172
development/at/judicialwatch.org

Video and Multimedia