![](/wp-content/themes/judicial-watch/assets/images/logo-color.png)
![](/wp-content/themes/judicial-watch/assets/images/logo-color.png)
9th Circuit Upholds Voter ID Law
In a much-needed victory for voter identification laws, a famously liberal federal appellate court has upheld a state measure requiring citizens to show a photo ID before casting a ballot in an election.
The voter ID issue is getting hotter and hotter as the presidential election approaches. More than two dozen states have laws requiring voters to show at least some type of identification to vote. Several statesâincluding Texas and Pennsylvaniaâhave enacted voter ID measures in the last year and the Obama Department of Justice (DOJ) has vowed to block them or at least heavily scrutinize them.
In fact, Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Thomas Perez has publicly said that DOJ lawyers are probing voter ID measures to ensure that theyâre not racially discriminatory. âWe have received numerous inquiries about recently enacted state laws relating to voter identification requirements, voter registration requirements and changes to early voting procedures,â Perez said, adding that âwe are carefully reviewing these laws.â
This has forced states to waste scarce tax dollars to defend the common-sense policy requiring photo identification at the polls. Democrats and the liberal civil rights groups that support them claim it discriminates against minorities. In fact, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the Florida congresswoman who chairs the Democratic National Committee, says voter ID laws are a âfull-scale-assaultâ on minority voters designed to ârigâ elections for Republicans.
Even the U.S. Supreme Court has disagreed with that absurd assessment. In 2008 the High Court upheld Indianaâs voter ID law, ruling that the stateâs interest in protecting the integrity of the voting process outweighed the insufficiently proven burdens the law may impose on voters. âThere is no question about the legitimacy or importance of the Stateâs interest in counting only the votes of eligible voters,â the nationâs highest court said in its decision.
This week the notoriously liberal 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an Arizona requirement that voters show photo identification before casting a ballot. A renowned Latino rights group claimed the measure, approved by voters in 2004 to stop illegal immigrants from voting, discriminates against Hispanics because it creates a barrier for minorities thatâs tantamount to a poll tax. If true, that would violate equal protection rights within the Constitution.
The 9th Circuit disagreed, saying that no proof was offered to show that the ID requirement gave Latinos fewer opportunities to vote. The Arizona lawâs âphoto identification requirement is not an invidious restrictionâ and does not violate the 14th Amendmentâs equal protection clause, the court wrote in its 73-page decision.
Judicial Watch applauds any measuresâsuch as voter ID requirementsâthat help keep the election process free of corruption. Earlier this year JW launched the 2012 Election Integrity Project to assure that voter rolls are as clean as required by federal law. Through publicly available data, JW has already discovered that voter rolls in several statesâincluding Mississippi, Iowa, Indiana, Missouri, Texas, Florida, Alabama, California and Coloradoâcontain the names of individuals who are not eligible to vote.