Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Judicial Watch

Press Releases

Judicial Watch Files Amicus Curiae Brief to Overturn Sanctions against Lawyers in 2020 Election Challenges

Argues U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Abused its Discretion in Sanctioning Sidney Powell and other Lawyers.

 

(Washington, DC)Judicial Watch announced today it filed an amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit supporting Sidney Powell’s appeal of sanctions levied against her and her associates in Michigan 2020 election challenges. Judicial Watch argues the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan abused its discretion in sanctioning Powell and other lawyers involved in the case.

This Judicial Watch amicus brief comes in the case King, et al. v. Whitmer, et al., (Appeal No. 21-1786), in which Powell and other attorneys ask the appeals court to reverse the lower court’s order sanctioning them.

Judicial Watch argues that improperly sanctioning lawyers for bringing civil rights litigation on elections will have a chilling effect:

Voting and election litigation constitute some of the most contentious, political forms of civil rights litigation. These qualities are even more acute in postelection disputes where litigation schedules are compressed and available information is limited and often dynamic. Nevertheless, the prosecution (and defense) of election disputes play an important role in our electoral and political process.

As a conservative advocacy group that often brings election and voting lawsuits, including those to enforce federal and state election integrity laws, Judicial Watch has a particular interest in the issues at stake here. If the decision of the district court is affirmed, and the Appellants are sanctioned, the precedent will be weaponized to threaten legitimate parties prosecuting election integrity claims.

“Courts sanctioning lawyers pursuing election law claims in the heat of an election is a dangerous game that could allow election corruption to go unchecked,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The partisan retaliation and harassment of lawyers involved in litigating the 2020 election dispute is unprecedented and undermines the rule of law – and courts should not take part in it.”

###

Related

‘Peanut the Squirrel’ Update

Authorities Planned to Euthanize Peanut the Squirrel Before Seizing Him Judicial Watch Seeks U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Plan to Find Illegal Immigrant Minors   ...

NSF Cancels DEI Grants Awarded under Multi-Billion-Dollar Biden Plan to Politicize Scientific Research

Corruption Chronicles | April 25, 2025
While liberals and their mainstream media allies express outrage that the federal agency that funds most of the nation’s scientific research is cancelling grants focused on diversi...

New Details Emerge in Viral Squirrel’s Seizure and Death

In The News | April 23, 2025
From WIBX: According to Judicial Watch, the newly released documents confirm what many had feared: euthanasia was discussed and prepped for before the seizure ever even took place....