Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Corruption Chronicles

Clinton Judge Strikes Hazleton Illegal Alien Law

The nation’s first federal trial to decide whether local governments can act to curb illegal immigration ended with a Clinton-appointed judge striking down a northeastern Pennsylvania city’s law as unconstitutional.

The nine-day bench trial began months ago and featured a face off between Latino rights groups and Hazleton Pennsylvania officials defending their right to rid their quaint little city of violent illegal immigrants in the wake of federal inaction.

The blocked law (Illegal Immigration Relief Act) was actually inspired by a pair of illegal immigrants who committed a violent shooting in Hazleton. The measure sought to impose fines on landlords who rent to illegal immigrants and deny business permits to companies that give them jobs.

While drafting the legislation, fed up city officials provided crucial data that illustrated how illegal immigrants have overwhelmed the city’s police department with drugs, crime and gangs. Furthermore, city lawmakers said they had to take action because the federal government would not.

In his 206-page opinion, U.S. District Judge James Munley dismisses Hazleton’s frustrations over the dismal state of federal immigration enforcement and calls its ordinance unconstitutional because it conflicts with federal law.

He goes on the write that, even if federal law did not conflict with Hazleton’s measures, the city could not enact an ordinance that violates rights the Constitution guarantees to every person in the United States, whether legal resident or not.

Equally frustrated with inaction at the federal level, dozens of municipalities across the nation have created laws similar to Hazleton’s in the last year. This decision will undoubtedly have an effect on all of them. Perhaps the federal government will once and for all step up the plate on this issue.

Judicial Watch is a non-partisan, educational foundation dedicated to fighting government and judicial corruption and promoting a return to ethics and morality in our nation’s public life. To view the Judicial Watch Internet site click here (www.judicialwatch.org).


Related

Terrorists Use Weapons Left by U.S. in Afghanistan to Attack Civilians, Police in Pakistan

Corruption Chronicles | September 19, 2024
Sophisticated weapons and other military equipment left behind by U.S. troops during the 2021 Afghanistan withdrawal are being used by Islamic terrorists in Pakistan’s largest prov...

Plaintiffs Seek to Keep Reparations Suit Alive

In The News | September 18, 2024
From Evanston Now: The initial lawsuit was filed in May by Judicial Watch, a conservative legal action group, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Judi...

Judicial Watch Pursues Class Action Lawsuit against Reparations Policy – Asks Federal Court to…

Press Releases | September 18, 2024
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it asked a court to reject a motion by the City of Evanston, IL, to dismiss Judicial Watch’s class action lawsuit on behalf o...