Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Corruption Chronicles

Court Lets N.J. Gov. Hide Emails

A New Jersey Appellate Court has reversed a judge’s decision ordering the governor to disclose electronic mail exchanges with his labor union leader girlfriend while they were on opposing sides of state worker contract negotiations. 

A Superior Court judge had previously ordered Governor Jon Corzine to make public hundreds of pages of emails exchanged with girlfriend Carla Katz, president of the largest union representing state workers (Communications Workers of America Local 1034), because both parties were heavily involved in public negotiations at the time.

For more than a year, the Democrat governor refused to disclose the files claiming that they are protected under privileges of his office. Last June, Superior Court Judge Paul Innes ordered Corzine to release the emails because the public has the right to know whether the relationship had any “improper influence on the governor’s paramount obligation to serve the interest of the citizens of New Jersey first.” 

Corzine quickly appealed and this week a three-judge New Jersey Appellate Court panel reversed that order, claiming that the emails are in fact covered under executive privilege. In a 37-page decision, the court said that the governor properly asserted executive privilege. 

“The release of confidential e-mails may have a chilling effect on the governor’s ability or willingness to solicit advice, or accept unsolicited advice in the future,” according to the ruling, which goes on to say that the governor “must be accorded a qualified power to protect the confidentiality of communication pertaining to the executive function.”  

Never mind the obvious conflict created by the romantic relationship of the two key players in a massive state contract negotiation. Clearly, it could have tainted the process and taxpayers certainly have the right to know. 


Related

New Court Victory in Fani Willis Documents Case

VICTORY: Court Orders DOJ to Provide Info on Jack Smith’s Communications with Fani Willis Judicial Watch Sues for Records on Kamala Harris Travel Costs Judicial Watch Asks Supreme ...

Judicial Watch, Allied Educational Foundation File Amici Brief Asking Supreme Court to Eliminate Woke,…

Press Releases | February 07, 2025
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it filed in the U.S. Supreme Court an amici curiae (friend of the court) brief along with the Allied Educational Foundation (AEF),...

Judge orders Trump prosecutors to dish in collusion case

In The News | February 05, 2025
From Washington Examiner: Judicial Watch had been seeking communications between Smith’s office and the Fulton County district attorney “requesting or receiving federal funds or o...