Skip to content

Get Judicial Watch Updates!

DONATE

Judicial Watch • JW v State HRC security clearance complaint 02496

JW v State HRC security clearance complaint 02496

JW v State HRC security clearance complaint 02496

Page 1: JW v State HRC security clearance complaint 02496

Category:

Number of Pages:4

Date Created:October 30, 2018

Date Uploaded to the Library:October 30, 2018

Tags:02496, WDICIAL, clearance, peterson, determination, HRC, Plaintiffs, complaint, security, responsive, September, Hillary Clinton, defendant, filed, plaintiff, request, document, records, FOIA, Washington


File Scanned for Malware

Donate now to keep these documents public!


See Generated Text   ∨

Autogenerated text from PDF

Case 1:18-cv-02496 Document Filed 10/29/18 Page THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT COLUMBIA
WDICIAL WATCH, INC.,
425 Third Street SW, Suite 800
Washington, 20024,
Plaintiff,
U.S. DEPARTMENT STATE,
The Executive Office
Office the Legal Adviser, Suite 5.600
600 19th Street, N.W.
Washington, 20522,
Defendant.
Civil Action No.
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff Judicial Watch, Inc. brings this action against Defendant U.S. Department
State compel compliance with the Freedom oflnformation Act, U.S.C. 552 (FOIA).
grounds therefor, Plaintiff alleges follows:
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
The Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant U.S.C. 552(a)( 4)(B)
and U.S.C. 1331.
Venue proper this district pursuant U.S.C. 139l(e).
PARTIES
Plaintiff Judicial Watch, Inc. not-for-profit, educational organization
incorporated under the laws the District Columbia and headquartered 425 Third Street
SW, Suite 800, Washington, 20024. Plaintiff seeks promote transparency, integrity, and
accountability government and fidelity the rule law. part its mission, Plaintiff
regularly requests records from federal agencies pursuant FOIA. Plaintiff analyzes the
Case 1:18-cv-02496 Document Filed 10/29/18 Page
agencies responses and disseminates both its findings and the requested records the American
public inform them about what their government to.
Defendant U.S. Department State agency the United States
Government headquartered 2201 Street, W., Washington, 20520. Defendant has
possession, custody, and control records which Plaintiff seeks access.
STATEMENT FACTS August 21, 2018, Plaintiff submitted FOIA request Defendant seeking
access the following records:
Any and all records concerning, regarding, relating the security clearance
status former Secretary State Hillary Clinton, Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills,
Jacob Sullivan, and Phillipe Reines.
The time frame for Plaintiffs FOIA request January 21, 2017 the present. letter dated September 14, 2018, Defendant acknowledged receipt
Plaintiffs request August 29, 2018 and advised Plaintiff that the request had been assigned
the tracking number F-2018-06631.
Pursuant U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(A)(i), the Defendant was required determine
whether comply with Plaintiffs request within (20) working days after its receipt and notify
Plaintiff immediately its determination, the records thereof, and the right appeal any
adverse determination. Defendants determination was due about March 14, 2018. the date this Complaint, Defendant has failed to: (i) produce the
requested records demonstrate that the requested records are lawfully exempt from
production; (ii) notify Plaintiff the scope any responsive records Defendant intends
produce withhold and the reasons for any withholdings; (iii) inform Plaintiff that may
appeal any adequately specific, adverse determination.
-2-
Case 1:18-cv-02496 Document Filed 10/29/18 Page
COUNTI
Violation ofFOIA, U.S.C. 552
10.
Plaintiff realleges paragraphs through fully stated herein.
11.
Plaintiff being irreparably harmed reason Defendants violation FOIA,
and Plaintiff will continue irreparably harmed unless Defendant compelled comply
with FOIA.
12. trigger FOIAs administrative exhaustion requirement, Defendant was
required determine whether comply with Plaintiffs request within twenty (20) working
days ofreceiving the request, about September 27, 2018. minimum, Defendant was
required to: (i) gather and review the requested documents; (ii) determine and communicate
Plaintiff the scope any responsive records Defendant intended produce withhold and the
reasons for any withholdings; and (iii) inform Plaintiff that may appeal any adequately
specific, adverse determination. See, e.g., Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics Washington Federal Election Commission, 711 F.3d 180, 188-89 (D.C. Cir. 2013).
13.
Because Defendant failed determine whether comply with Plaintiffs request
within the time period required FOIA, Plaintiff deemed have exhausted its administrative
appeal remedies. U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(C)(i).
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court: order Defendant
conduct searches for any and all records responsive Plaintiffs request and demonstrate
that employed search methods reasonably likely lead the discovery records responsive Plaintiffs FOIA request; (2) order Defendant produce, date certain, any and all nonexempt records responsive Plaintiffs FOIA request and Vaughn index any responsive
records withheld under claim exemption; (3) enjoin Defendant from continuing withhold
any and all non-exempt records responsive Plaintiffs FOIA request; (4) grant Plaintiff
-3-
Case 1:18-cv-02496 Document Filed 10/29/18 Page
award attorneys fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred this action pursuant
U.S.C. 552(a)( 4)(E); and (5) grant Plaintiff such other relief the Court deems just and
proper.
Dated: October 29, 2018
Respectfully submitted,
WDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Isl James Peterson
James Peterson
D.C. Bar No. 450171
Attorneys for Plaintiff
-4-