Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

In The News

DOJ Refuses To Release Records On Imran Awan, Citing ‘Technical Difficulties’ And A Secret Case, Court Docs Show

From The Daily Caller:

The Department of Justice is withholding documents about the Imran Awan cybersecurity scandal by saying there is an ongoing, secret case related to the matter, according to court papers.

Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit Nov. 7, 2018, for 7,000 pages of Capitol Police records related to the cybersecurity investigation, and Aug. 2, the DOJ agreed to begin producing records by Nov. 5.

That deadline came and went with no records being produced; on a Nov. 13 phone call, the DOJ said “technical difficulties” had resulted in a delay, Judicial Watch stated in a court filing.

Read More Here.

Related

Judicial Watch Sues Fed for Grand Jury Subpoenas Tied to Testimony about $2.5 Billion…

Press Releases | April 02, 2026
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for failing...

Judicial Watch Uncovers FBI Records Showing FBI Objections to Planned Mar-a-Lago Raid

Press Releases | April 01, 2026
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it has obtained 207 pages of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) records that reveal the FBI’s concerns about the legal bas...

Lawsuit against Evanston’s reparations program gets judge’s OK to move forward

In The News | April 01, 2026
From Crain’s Chicago Business: The 2024 lawsuit was filed by six people with hereditary ties to Evanston and by Judicial Watch, a conservative activist group. The suit claims...