Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Corruption Chronicles

Judge Admits Longtime Affair With Prosecutor

A Texas judge has admitted under oath that for years she had an intimate romantic relationship with a prosecutor who tried numerous criminal cases in her courtroom, including the death penalty trial of a man scheduled to be executed this summer.

The now retired state judge (Verla Sue Holland) and the elected Collin County District Attorney (Tom O’Connell) had a lengthy sexual relationship that was kept secret because that sort of unethical jurist-attorney intimacy could easily taint a judge’s ability to be impartial.

The pair finally came clean this week when a court order forced them to address the relationship because it’s key in an ongoing appeal by a man sentenced to death for a 1989 double murder. His attorneys have for months said that he did not get a fair trial because the judge and prosecutor—Holland and O’Connell—were romantically involved.

In a letter to Texas Governor Rick Perry this week, the convicted man’s attorney writes that the undercover affair was confirmed during the recent depositions of Holland and O’Connell and that the relationship was never disclosed to a single litigant or lawyer who appeared before the judge.

It points out that no reasonable person would believe that a fair trial is possible when the presiding judge has an intimate sexual relationship with one of the lawyers in the case and calls the affair a devastating indictment of the Texas criminal justice system. Other cases will probably be reopened now that the guilty parties have admitted wrongdoing.

Perhaps the unethical judge’s friends on the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals tried covering up for her when they refused to halt the convicted man’s scheduled execution in mid June by unanimously ruling that accusations of the relationship were raised too late in the appeals process. Judge Holland served on that Court of Criminal Appeals from 1997 to 2001 with eight of the nine judges who took part in the decision.


Related

Trump Trial Travesty

Kangaroo Court Prosecution of President Trump in the ‘Hush Money’ Trial Smoking Gun FBI Records Show that Fauci Funded Gain-of-Function Research Judicial Watch Sues for Damage Asse...

Patronis flips script on Whitehouse, demands any records related to wife and Citizens Insurance

In The News | April 19, 2024
From The Sun Sentinel: In a letter to Whitehouse, Patronis said he found the Democratic senator’s requests in November and March for information about Citizens Property Insurance C...

Judicial Watch: FBI Records Indicate Fauci Agency Funded Gain-of-Function Wuhan Lab Research ‘Would leave…

Press Releases | April 19, 2024
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it received 5 pages of records from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request that ...