Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Corruption Chronicles

Judge Rules Pedophiles Can Live Near Schools, Parks

A judge who used a skewed movie to determine that a fugitive child rapist was a victim of judicial misconduct has ruled that it’s unconstitutional to keep pedophiles and sex offenders away from schools and parks.

Ruling in favor of four paroled sex offenders, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Peter Espinoza said that a California law imposing strict residency requirements on sex offenders forces them to choose between prison and homelessness. Overwhelmingly passed by voters in 2006, the measure (Jessica’s Law) forbids convicted sex offenders from living within 2,000 feet of any school or park frequented by children.

“The evidence presented suggests that despite lay belief, a sex offender parolee’s residential proximity to a school or park where children regularly gather does not bear on the parolee’s likelihood to commit a sexual offense against a child,” the judge, who supervises the county’s criminal courts, wrote in his order. He also wrote that an increase in homeless sex offenders—supposedly an outcome of the law—would risk public safety.

This is the same judge who considered a biased cable documentary as evidence in the case of a Hollywood director (Roman Polanski) convicted of drugging and raping a teenage girl in the late 1970s. To avoid jail, Polanski fled to France and came close to being extradited last year. Espinoza presided over the case last year and said that the film (“Roman Polanski:Watned and Desired”) uncovered new information of judicial misconduct on the part of the deceased judge who originally handled the case.

In another controversial ruling, last year Espinoza ordered the release of a man convicted in the 1992 execution-style slaying of a high school classmate. Due to the crime’s gruesome nature—the victim was stabbed, beaten and strangled with a metal wire before getting thrown over a cliff—the governor overturned the murderer’s parole on the grounds that it would pose an unreasonable risk of danger to society. Espinoza stepped in and ordered the release, nixing the governor’s two arguments for denying it; admission of guilt and the gravity of the offense.


 


Related

First-in-the-nation reparations scheme SLAPPED by lawsuit that calls $25,000 payouts to blacks 'unconstitutional'

In The News | May 29, 2024
From The Daily Caller: The class-action lawsuit led by Judicial Watch, a conservative group, casts doubt on the future of the watershed reparations program in Evanston, a Chicago s...

FARRELL: Clean Voter Rolls Matter

In The News | May 29, 2024
From The Daily Caller: Dirty voter rolls make for dirty elections. Sloppy registration and accountability procedures and/or willful blindness to loaded-up voter rolls are key ingre...

Legal Analysts Share Thoughts About Trump Trial

In The News | May 29, 2024
From The Epoch Times: Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, told The Epoch Times that Justice Merchan “enabled the lawlessness of this case” by allowing it to move forward. “He ...