Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Corruption Chronicles

Judgeships For Sale In New York?

The Brooklyn New York District Attorney is investigating whether several judges paid their way to the bench (New York Daily News). The man who apparently has evidence, Clarence Norman, is the former head of the Brooklyn Democratic Party and he refuses to cooperate.

A notorious Brooklyn political powerhouse and former assemblyman, Norman was recently convicted of three felony counts for soliciting and receiving illegal campaign contributions. This week, he goes on trial again on charges that he committed grand larceny in 2001, when he took a $5,000 check from his political club to his re-election committee and deposited it in a personal account.

It turns out that there is quite a connection between Norman and several of the nine Brooklyn judicial candidates who have been refused the coveted seal of approval from the Association of the Bar of the City of New York.

One of them is Genine Edwards, a personal injury lawyer whose mother belongs to the Crown Heights church where Norman’s father is head pastor. Another, according to media reports is Francois Rivera. Denis Hamill writes in the New York Daily News:

…We have a judge named Francois Rivera famous for being a nobody before it was suggested he paid Democratic boss Clarence Norman $50,000 for his state Supreme Court judgeship. No wonder Norman is in trouble. First, in his recent corruption trial, where he was convicted, he hired as his defense attorney one Eddie Rappaport Esq., perhaps the most unpopular judge ever to warm the Brooklyn bench.

Related

VICTORY: Historic Supreme Court Election Law Ruling

The Most Important Supreme Court Election Law Ruling in a Generation Judicial Watch Sues to Reveal Biden Cover-Up on Iran Nuclear Program Judicial Watch Sues Over Firing of Associa...

Judicial Watch Sues for Records Tied to Biden Administration Cover-Up on Iran Nuclear Program

Press Releases | January 16, 2026
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) for record...

Supreme Court Upholds Candidate Standing in Ballot Counting Case

In The News | January 15, 2026
From Daily Signal: Judicial Watch represented the plaintiffs in the case. “This is the most important Supreme Court election law ruling in a generation,” Judicial Watch President T...