Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

In The News

Judicial Watch: Clinton Sock Drawer Audio Tape Case Exonerates Pres. Trump

From One America News Network:

A decade old legal case that could exonerate former President Donald Trump has been buried by legacy media. 

“[Special counsel] Jack Smith is terrified of the only standing legal case decision from a court concerning the Presidential Records Act,” said Chris Farrell, Director of Investigations at Judicial Watch. 

The case Farrell is referring to is titled Judicial Watch v. National Archives and Records Administration – also known as the “Clinton sock drawer” case. Former President Bill Clinton created White House audio tapes with historian Taylor Branch and stored them in his sock drawer. Judicial Watch sued to obtain access to the tapes and lost. 

“He took them from the White House with him into private life,” said Farrell. “There’s classified material on those tapes and arguably it’s the sort of running stream of consciousness record of Bill Clinton’s presidency. Pretty important stuff.” 

Special counsel Jack Smith is currently investigating the 45th president for his handling of classified documents since departing the White House. But Farrell says the ruling in this specific case from 2012 exonerates Trump from any alleged wrongdoing. 

“Amy Berman Jackson, the judge presiding on that case, said a couple of very important things,” said Farrell. “That the president had an absolute, unreviewable right to take any records or documents that he wants when he leaves office. “ 

“No one can come back and second guess or double think or ask questions about what the president elects to take with him,” Farrell continued. 

In her ruling, Jackson wrote that “the President enjoys unconstrained authority to make decisions regarding the disposal of documents: ‘[a]lthough the President must notify the Archivist before disposing of records . . . neither the Archivist nor Congress has the authority to veto the President’s disposal decision.’” 

Farrell points out that this ruling has existed without challenge or question for ten years. 

Read more here

Related

VICTORY: Historic Supreme Court Election Law Ruling

The Most Important Supreme Court Election Law Ruling in a Generation Judicial Watch Sues to Reveal Biden Cover-Up on Iran Nuclear Program Judicial Watch Sues Over Firing of Associa...

Judicial Watch Sues for Records Tied to Biden Administration Cover-Up on Iran Nuclear Program

Press Releases | January 16, 2026
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) for record...

Supreme Court Upholds Candidate Standing in Ballot Counting Case

In The News | January 15, 2026
From Daily Signal: Judicial Watch represented the plaintiffs in the case. “This is the most important Supreme Court election law ruling in a generation,” Judicial Watch President T...