Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

In The News

Judicial Watch: Clinton Sock Drawer Audio Tape Case Exonerates Pres. Trump

From One America News Network:

A decade old legal case that could exonerate former President Donald Trump has been buried by legacy media. 

“[Special counsel] Jack Smith is terrified of the only standing legal case decision from a court concerning the Presidential Records Act,” said Chris Farrell, Director of Investigations at Judicial Watch. 

The case Farrell is referring to is titled Judicial Watch v. National Archives and Records Administration – also known as the “Clinton sock drawer” case. Former President Bill Clinton created White House audio tapes with historian Taylor Branch and stored them in his sock drawer. Judicial Watch sued to obtain access to the tapes and lost. 

“He took them from the White House with him into private life,” said Farrell. “There’s classified material on those tapes and arguably it’s the sort of running stream of consciousness record of Bill Clinton’s presidency. Pretty important stuff.” 

Special counsel Jack Smith is currently investigating the 45th president for his handling of classified documents since departing the White House. But Farrell says the ruling in this specific case from 2012 exonerates Trump from any alleged wrongdoing. 

“Amy Berman Jackson, the judge presiding on that case, said a couple of very important things,” said Farrell. “That the president had an absolute, unreviewable right to take any records or documents that he wants when he leaves office. “ 

“No one can come back and second guess or double think or ask questions about what the president elects to take with him,” Farrell continued. 

In her ruling, Jackson wrote that “the President enjoys unconstrained authority to make decisions regarding the disposal of documents: ‘[a]lthough the President must notify the Archivist before disposing of records . . . neither the Archivist nor Congress has the authority to veto the President’s disposal decision.’” 

Farrell points out that this ruling has existed without challenge or question for ten years. 

Read more here

Related

Biden Judge Rules Muslim Terrorist Has Religious Right to Keep Hijab in Federal Prison

Corruption Chronicles | May 04, 2026
In a troubling development, a terrorist front group that has gained tremendous influence by suing and lobbying to embed Islam in American public institutions has succeeded in getti...

Judicial Watch Victory: Arizona Appeals Court Rules State AG Kris Mayes’ Office Failed to…

Press Releases | May 04, 2026
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that the Arizona Court of Appeals overturned a lower court’s decision that allowed Arizona State Attorney General Kris Mayes to hi...

Supreme Court Victory!

Supreme Court Blocks Race-Based Gerrymandering Court Victory: D.C. Blocked from Hiding January 6 Bodycam Footage Oregon Settlement Targets 800,000 Ineligible Voter Registrations Ne...