Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Press Releases

Judicial Watch: Federal Appeals Court Hearing on State Department Emails Set for February 7

Judicial Watch Wants Records of State Employees Who Used Private Accounts for Government Business

(Washington DC) – Judicial Watch today announced oral argument will be heard Tuesday, February 7, 2017, in Judicial Watch’s Appeal (No. 16-5170) regarding its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit seeking records that identify the number and names of all U.S. Department employees who used non-government email addresses to conduct official State Department business (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00690)).

Judicial Watch’s lawsuit, filed on May 6, 2015, seeks:

  • All records that identify the number and names of all current and former officials, officers, or employees of the U.S. Department of State from January 20, 2009 to the present who used email addresses other than their assigned “state.gov” email addresses to conduct official State Department business.

Judge Rosemary M. Collyer granted summary judgment in State Department’s favor, closing the case.  Judicial Watch appealed the lower court’s decision on June 2, 2016.  In its briefing documents Judicial Watch argues:

The crux of this case is the [State Department] knew or should have known which documents [Judicial Watch] was seeking, but chose not to comply. A review of the record provided in the Joint Appendix demonstrates that State cannot credibly claim that it could not understand which records [Judicial Watch] sought.

***

State’s efforts to demonstrate that its search for records was adequate similarly fail. Indeed, had State complied with FOIA’s requirements for agencies to conduct sufficient searches, this litigation likely never would have progressed this far.

***

The irony that State has gone to these lengths to avoid responding to a FOIA request about the use of unofficial email accounts – which is itself a well-known FOIA evasion tactic – should not be lost on this Court.

Oral argument is scheduled to be heard before D.C. Circuit Judges Karen L. Henderson, Harry T. Edwards and David B. Sentelle:

Date:               Tuesday, February, 7, 2017

Time:               9:30 a.m. ET

Location:        Courtroom 31

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

333 Constitution Ave NW

Washington, DC 20001

###

 

Related

Biden Judge Rules Muslim Terrorist Has Religious Right to Keep Hijab in Federal Prison

Corruption Chronicles | May 04, 2026
In a troubling development, a terrorist front group that has gained tremendous influence by suing and lobbying to embed Islam in American public institutions has succeeded in getti...

Judicial Watch Victory: Arizona Appeals Court Rules State AG Kris Mayes’ Office Failed to…

Press Releases | May 04, 2026
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that the Arizona Court of Appeals overturned a lower court’s decision that allowed Arizona State Attorney General Kris Mayes to hi...

Supreme Court Victory!

Supreme Court Blocks Race-Based Gerrymandering Court Victory: D.C. Blocked from Hiding January 6 Bodycam Footage Oregon Settlement Targets 800,000 Ineligible Voter Registrations Ne...