Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Judicial Watch

Press Releases

Judicial Watch: Federal Appeals Court Hearing on State Department Emails Set for February 7

Judicial Watch Wants Records of State Employees Who Used Private Accounts for Government Business

(Washington DC) – Judicial Watch today announced oral argument will be heard Tuesday, February 7, 2017, in Judicial Watch’s Appeal (No. 16-5170) regarding its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit seeking records that identify the number and names of all U.S. Department employees who used non-government email addresses to conduct official State Department business (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00690)).

Judicial Watch’s lawsuit, filed on May 6, 2015, seeks:

  • All records that identify the number and names of all current and former officials, officers, or employees of the U.S. Department of State from January 20, 2009 to the present who used email addresses other than their assigned “state.gov” email addresses to conduct official State Department business.

Judge Rosemary M. Collyer granted summary judgment in State Department’s favor, closing the case.  Judicial Watch appealed the lower court’s decision on June 2, 2016.  In its briefing documents Judicial Watch argues:

The crux of this case is the [State Department] knew or should have known which documents [Judicial Watch] was seeking, but chose not to comply. A review of the record provided in the Joint Appendix demonstrates that State cannot credibly claim that it could not understand which records [Judicial Watch] sought.

***

State’s efforts to demonstrate that its search for records was adequate similarly fail. Indeed, had State complied with FOIA’s requirements for agencies to conduct sufficient searches, this litigation likely never would have progressed this far.

***

The irony that State has gone to these lengths to avoid responding to a FOIA request about the use of unofficial email accounts – which is itself a well-known FOIA evasion tactic – should not be lost on this Court.

Oral argument is scheduled to be heard before D.C. Circuit Judges Karen L. Henderson, Harry T. Edwards and David B. Sentelle:

Date:               Tuesday, February, 7, 2017

Time:               9:30 a.m. ET

Location:        Courtroom 31

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

333 Constitution Ave NW

Washington, DC 20001

###

 

Related

Judicial Watch sues Homeland Security for records on Trump assassination attempt in Pennsylvania

In The News | March 19, 2025
From Just the News: The conservative legal group Judicial Watch on Tuesday sued the Department of Homeland Security for documents and data related to the July 13, 2024, assassinati...

DA Fani Willis’ office ‘openly hostile’ in Trump records case, must pay $54K in…

In The News | March 19, 2025
From New York Post: Wade was forced to step down in March 2024 while Willis was booted from the case by an appeals court in December. Her entire office was barred from any further ...

Justice for Peanut the Squirrel and Fred the Raccoon May Be Coming After All

In The News | March 19, 2025
From Townhall: The “murder” of internet sensations Peanut (or P’Nut) the squirrel and Fred the raccoon by New York state wildlife agents became a political flashpoint i...