Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Press Releases

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Hearing on Official DHS Emails in Private, Unsecure Email Accounts of Former Secretary Johnson and Other Top Officials

Hearing set for Friday, February 17

(Washington, DC) — Judicial Watch today announced a hearing will be held on Friday, February 17, 2017, regarding Judicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit seeking emails “relating to official United States Government business sent to or from” Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson and three other top Homeland Security officials that used “non-‘.gov’” email addresses (Judicial Watch, Inc., v. United States Department of Homeland Security (No. l:l6-cv-00967)).

The hearing will focus on whether the Department of Homeland Security has made any efforts to recover the official government emails still residing in the private email accounts of former Secretary Johnson and other officials.

The hearing was ordered subsequent to a May 23, 2016, FOIA lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch after Homeland Security failed to respond to a December 29, 2015, FOIA request.

The court hearing is scheduled for Friday afternoon:

Date:               Friday, February 17, 2017

Time:               2 p.m. ET

Location:        Courtroom 21

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

333 Constitution Ave NW

Washington, DC 20001

Judicial Watch already has obtained 215 pages of documents containing official emails sent through the private, unsecure email accounts of Johnson and three other top Homeland Security officials. The documents include emails discussing high-level meetings Johnson was to have with the Kuwaiti ambassador and Saudi Arabian Interior Ministry officials, as well as a West African $4.5 million online consumer fraud scam.

Prior to the Obama administration’s leaving office, Judge Moss ordered the Department of Homeland Security to preserve email records sought by Judicial Watch “to minimize the risk of an inadvertent loss of potentially responsive emails.” In petitioning the court for the preservation order, Judicial Watch argued:

A court order requiring preservation of these emails is particularly necessary now as DHS has suggested that these officials may have been acting without authorization by sending emails from these accounts … As such, there is no assurance that these officials will abide by a “request” by the agency to preserve these emails, particularly after their employment ends. …

Judicial Watch previously uncovered documents revealing that Secretary Jeh Johnson and 28 other agency officials used government computers to access personal web-based email accounts despite an agency-wide ban due to heightened security concerns.  The documents also reveal that Homeland Security officials misled Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) when Perry specifically asked whether personal accounts were being used for official government business.

###

Related

Supreme Court Upholds Candidate Standing in Ballot Counting Case

In The News | January 15, 2026
From Daily Signal: Judicial Watch represented the plaintiffs in the case. “This is the most important Supreme Court election law ruling in a generation,” Judicial Watch President T...

Barnstable educator allegedly fired over Facebook posts sues district

In The News | January 15, 2026
From Boston.com: Judicial Watch, a conservative education foundation, filed the lawsuit on behalf of Bergonzi in federal district court in Boston last week. The former associate pr...

Educator sues after being fired for conservative Facebook Posts

In The News | January 14, 2026
From USA Today: A conservative organization has sued a Massachusetts public school district in federal court, alleging it violated an associate principal’s First Amendment rights b...