Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!


Press Releases

Judicial Watch: Hearing Monday, June 5 Over Homeland Security Assertion of ‘Privacy Rights’ to Prevent Release of Names of Freed Criminal Aliens

Federal Immigration Officials in Arizona Released 149 Criminal Aliens Who Had Committed 260 Crimes

(Washington, DC) — Judicial Watch today announced a court hearing will be held on Monday, June 5, 2017, in the U.S. District Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, regarding a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit seeking the names of 149 criminal alien detainees released by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in late February or early March 2013 (Tuffly v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (No. 16-15342)).

In late February and early March of 2013, ICE released the 149 criminal aliens (during the course of pending removal proceedings) from five Arizona correction facilities, citing “fiscal uncertainty.”  According to records obtained by Judicial Watch, the illegals had committed 260 crimes, and 40 of them had been incarcerated for violent crimes. The records were obtained in a FOIA lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch on behalf of Edward “Bud” Tuffly, the treasurer of the National Border Patrol Council, the union that represents Border Patrol agents.

In the appeal process, Judicial Watch asked the court to consider: “Whether the names of criminal alien detainees released from federal facilities in Arizona due to ‘fiscal uncertainty’ are being properly withheld under the personal privacy exemptions of the Freedom of Information Act.”

Judicial Watch argued the names of the criminal aliens were improperly withheld under claims of privacy exemption FOIA exemption B7(C) – “Law enforcement information whose disclosure would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy:”

The exemptions are not absolute. They require a balancing of the privacy interests at stake with the public’s interest in disclosure. In this case, the criminal aliens have an attenuated privacy interest due to the fact that their prior convictions are already a matter of public record. Further, the release of the names will allow the public to monitor DHS’s conduct in supervising potentially dangerous criminal aliens, who are subject to removal but have been released prior to that removal. The public’s strong interest in disclosure therefore outweighs the minimal privacy interests of the criminal aliens.

Judicial Watch also argued against a Department of Justice claim on behalf of Homeland Security that would equate the names of illegal criminal aliens with foreign military personnel receiving professional training from the U.S. government.

“The names of criminals are regularly published,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said.  “The release of the names of these illegal alien criminals is no different, and will help the public know something about how the government is conducting the supervision of these potentially dangerous criminals.  Once again, it looks like the ‘deep state’ is ignoring the Trump administration policies that put the safety of Americans first.”

The appellate court hearing is scheduled for:

Date: Monday, June 5, 2017

Time: 9:30 am PT

Location: Courtroom 1

U.S. District Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Richard H. Chambers Courthouse

125 South Grand Ave.

Pasadena, CA



New Biden Censorship Targeting

Judicial Watch Taking the Lead—For America at CPAC! Biden Agency Gives College Nearly $1 Million to Monitor Americans for Possible Censorship Democrats Furious at Special Counsel f...

Why did Texas A&M decide to shut down its Qatar campus?

In The News | February 22, 2024
From The Jerusalem Post: Why would a respectable public American university decide to shut down its Middle East campus, sacrificing international prestige and hundreds of millions ...

Democrats Furious at Special Counsel for Transparency on Biden Memory Failures

Investigative Bulletin | February 22, 2024
High-ranking Democratic Party officials professed shock, shock, when Special Counsel Robert Hur on February 8 released a report describing President Biden as an “elderly man with a...