Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Judicial Watch

Corruption Chronicles

Most Americans Oppose Obama’s Ariz. Lawsuit

 

In a major blow for the Obama Administration just months before the midterm elections, an overwhelming majority of Americans oppose the federal government’s lawsuit against Arizona’s new immigration control law.

Most Americans, not only back  Arizona’s measure, they support a similar bill aimed at restricting illegal immigration in their own state, according to a pair of national polls released this week. First a Rasmussen Reports survey divulged that 56% of Americans oppose the president’s lawsuit against Arizona while only 28% agree with it. In the same survey 61% of respondents said they would like to see a similar law in their state.

A separate poll, conducted by  Gallup, says that 50% of all Americans are against Obama’s lawsuit while only 33% favor it. As one major newspaper report points out; with less than four months before his first midterm election, President Obama’s lawsuit against Arizona‘s new illegal immigrant law is running against a strong tide of American support for the measure.

None of this is surprising since practically every poll conducted after Arizona’s law passed in April has revealed that most Americans support the measure to curb illegal immigration. In one national survey 82% of Americans opposed a boycott of Arizona over the new law and in another a substantial majority said they want a decrease in illegal immigrants and more agents to secure the Mexican border.

None of this has stopped the president from wasting U.S. tax dollars to block a border state desperately trying to survive a crisis created, in part, by the federal government’s negligence. Modeled after the federal statute, Arizona’s law makes it a state crime to be in the U.S. illegally, bans “sanctuary city” policies and allows local police to inquire about suspects’ immigration status.

That “unconstitutionally” interferes with federal immigration responsibilities, according to the Justice Department lawsuit filed on behalf of the Obama Administration this week. Attorney General Eric Holder acknowledges that “Arizonans are understandably frustrated with illegal immigration” but “setting immigration policy and enforcing immigration laws is a national responsibility.” If only the feds would do their job.



 

Related

Judicial Watch sues Homeland Security for records on Trump assassination attempt in Pennsylvania

In The News | March 19, 2025
From Just the News: The conservative legal group Judicial Watch on Tuesday sued the Department of Homeland Security for documents and data related to the July 13, 2024, assassinati...

DA Fani Willis’ office ‘openly hostile’ in Trump records case, must pay $54K in…

In The News | March 19, 2025
From New York Post: Wade was forced to step down in March 2024 while Willis was booted from the case by an appeals court in December. Her entire office was barred from any further ...

Justice for Peanut the Squirrel and Fred the Raccoon May Be Coming After All

In The News | March 19, 2025
From Townhall: The “murder” of internet sensations Peanut (or P’Nut) the squirrel and Fred the raccoon by New York state wildlife agents became a political flashpoint i...