Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Corruption Chronicles

SCOTUS To Hear Obama Employer Sanction Law Challenge

Although President Obama vowed to crack down on businesses that hire illegal immigrants, the administration will ask the Supreme Court this week to kill an Arizona measure—signed into law by former Governor Janet Napolitano—that punishes employers who hire undocumented workers.

Upheld by two federal courts, the Legal Arizona Workers Act requires companies to certify that employees are authorized to work in the U.S. by using a federal electronic database known as E-Verify to check the Social Security number and immigration status of new hires. Those caught hiring illegal workers are severely punished and can have their business license revoked.

When she signed the law in mid 2007, then-Governor Napolitano, Obama’s Homeland Security Secretary, said she did it “out of the realization that the flow of illegal immigration into our state is due to the constant demand of some employers for cheap, undocumented labor.” Napolitano also took the opportunity to chastise the feds for not dealing with immigration issues and essentially sticking it to the states.

Now she will stand by as her boss works to defeat her measure by arguing that federal immigration law expressly preempts any state law imposing sanctions on employers hiring illegal immigrants. Arizona’s measure disrupts “a careful balance that Congress struck nearly 25 years ago between two interests of the highest importance: ensuring that employers do not undermine enforcement of immigration laws by hiring unauthorized workers, while also ensuring that employers not discriminate against racial and ethnic minorities legally in the country,” according to a brief filed by the administration several months ago.

So far the landmark measure has been upheld by a federal judge in Phoenix and the San Francisco-based 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled that “the power to regulate the employment of unauthorized aliens remains within the states’ historic police powers.” Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan will sit this one out because, as Obama’s solicitor general last year, she asked the high court to consider the law’s challenge.

The Obama Administration is also fighting Arizona’s other immigration control law (SB 1070), which bans “sanctuary city” policies, makes it a state crime to be in the U.S. without proper documentation and requires police officers to stop and question anyone suspected of being an undocumented immigrant. The administration argues that it too is unconstitutional because it illegally intrudes on the federal government’s duties to enforce immigration laws.

Judicial Watch is defending SB 1070 by representing its author, Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce, in the ongoing legal battle. Click here to read about Judicial Watch’s efforts on behalf of SB 1070 as well as its nationwide actions to combat regulations that undermine the country’s immigration laws.


 


Related

Texas Border Operation Captures Half a Million Illegal Immigrants, Thousands of Felons

Corruption Chronicles | April 18, 2024
The Biden administration’s failure to secure the Mexican border forced Texas officials to establish a security initiative that has endured heavy criticism from Democrats and the me...

Judicial Watch Sues Intelligence Chief for Damage Assessment on Joe Biden’s Mishandling of Classified…

Press Releases | April 17, 2024
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) for all re...

Riot revisited: Trump’s plan to pardon Jan. 6 defendants

In The News | April 17, 2024
From The Washington Examiner: Some, such as Tom Fitton, president of the conservative watchdog Judicial Watch, say the term hostages is a “fair analysis” and that Trump would be ri...