Judicial Watch • Rodearmel v. Clinton (No. 09-171) – Hillary Clinton is constitutionally ineligible to serve as Secretary of State due to the “emoluments” clause

Rodearmel v. Clinton (No. 09-171) – Hillary Clinton is constitutionally ineligible to serve as Secretary of State due to the “emoluments” clause

Rodearmel v. Clinton (No. 09-171) – Hillary Clinton is constitutionally ineligible to serve as Secretary of State due to the “emoluments” clause

NOVEMBER 01, 2011

Article I, section 6 of the U.S. Constitution provides:

“No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been encreased during such time.”

This provision, known as the “Emoluments” or “Ineligibility” clause is an absolute prohibition and does not allow for any exceptions. The “Ineligibility Clause” is interpreted by most as designed by our Founding Fathers to protect against corruption and ensure the separation of powers among the three branches of government.On January 29, 2009, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against newly confirmed Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on the ground that she is constitutionally ineligible to serve as Secretary of State under the Ineligibility Clause. The “emoluments” or salary of the U.S. Secretary of State increased at least three times during Mrs. Clinton’s most recent U.S. Senate term. That term, which began on January 4, 2007, does not expire until January 2013, regardless of Mrs. Clinton’s recent resignation.Judicial Watch’s lawsuit is on behalf of Foreign Service Officer and State Department employee David Rodearmel, a retired Lt. Col. in the U.S. Army Reserve Judge Advocate General Corp. The lawsuit maintains that Mr. Rodearmel cannot serve under Secretary of State Clinton as it would force him to violate an oath he took as a Foreign Service Officer in 1991 to “support and defend” and “bear true faith and allegiance” to the Constitution of the United States. For more information on Mr. Rodearmel, see below.In December 2008, Congress attempted to evade the clear prohibition of the Ineligibility Clause with a so-called “Saxbe fix,” reducing the Secretary of State’s salary to the level in effect on January 1, 2007. This maneuver, first used in the Taft Administration, has been more frequently used in recent years by both parties, most notably allowing Republican Senator William Saxbe to become U.S. Attorney General in 1973 and Democratic Senator Lloyd Bentsen to become Treasury Secretary in 1993. A similar “fix” has been enacted for Senator Ken Salazar to join the Obama Cabinet as Secretary of the Interior. These attempted “fixes,” however, are insufficient, as they cannot alter the historical fact that — as in Mrs. Clinton’s case — salaries increased during the terms for which these officials were elected, thereby violating the Ineligibility Clause.The lawsuit was reviewed on an expedited basis by a special three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia who held that Mr. Rodearmel did not have standing and did not comment on the constitutional questions. Judicial Watch filed an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. On June 7, 2010, the Supreme Court refused to hear the case “for want of jurisdiction”, essentially upholding the lower court’s ruling that Mr. Rodearmel did not have standing for the lawsuit.


Judicial Watch Seal

Official Legal Documents

Legal Documents



Sign Up for Updates!



Sign Up for Updates!