Skip to content

Get Judicial Watch Updates!

DONATE

Judicial Watch • Heather Samuelson deposition 01242 pg 58

Heather Samuelson deposition 01242 pg 58

Heather Samuelson deposition 01242 pg 58

Page 1: Heather Samuelson deposition 01242 pg 58

Category:

Number of Pages:1

Date Created:June 27, 2019

Date Uploaded to the Library:June 27, 2019

Tags:Platte, heather, samuelson, Brewster, 01242, Clintons, deposition, clinton, State Department, FBI


File Scanned for Malware

Donate now to keep these documents public!


See Generated Text   ∨

Autogenerated text from PDF

Transcript Heather Samuelson
Conducted June 13, 2019
225 request Secretary Clinton this time provide the search parameters that were used for the review Secretary Clintons e-mails, would Secretary Clinton provide that the State Department?) posted the shouldnt say we. The her presidential campaign posted the regarding the search process their campaign website 2015. familiar that information has been released about this. asking specifically with respect what search terms were used and what names were used during the review process. cant speak that. Why not? would have consult other counsel. believe you, during your interview with the FBI, you were asked about gap e-mails that you noticed Secretary Clintons e-mails from January 2009 March 2009. you recall that?
MR. BREWSTER: Objection. Foundation.
227
MR. BREWSTER: Objection. Form. Foundation. understanding they did 2014. And was there any discussion whether they could obtain Secretary Clintons e-mails from that server from January 2009 March 2009?
MR. PEZZI: Objection. Beyond the scope.
MR. BREWSTER: Objection. Beyond the scope.
And the extent that you can answer the question without divulging attorney-client privileged communications, you may answer. did ask them, and they said they did not have any e-mails from that period. Let ask you, why did Secretary Clinton provide the e-mails hard-copy form, rather than their original electronic form the State Department?
MR. BREWSTER: the extent you can
answer
that question without divulging attorney-client privilege, you may answer.
226 do. Okay. Can you explain what that gap was? understanding well, sorry. should say recollection when received the documents the file from Platte River Networks, there was period time that was missing her e-mails. And that period time was January 2009 March 2009. And what did you the result discovering this gap the e-mails from January 2009 March 2009?
MR. PEZZI: Objection. Beyond the scope.
MR. BREWSTER: Same objection. asked Platte River why did not have why they did not provide those. And what did they tell you? They said they did not have that information. Did Platte River have access during 2014 the server that housed Secretary Clintons e-mails her Clintonemail.com account? (225 228)
228 Our understanding was that was the State Departments policy the time. And who told you that that was the State Departments policy the time?
MR. BREWSTER: Same objection. And this, the time frame December
2014. that what youre referring when you say the time? learned that capacity her attorney. did not have conversations with the State Department directly this. Did were there any discussions with State Department officials, either Richard Visek anybody else the State Department, with respect the e-mails being provided the State Department their original format, the electronic form, opposed hard copies?
MR. BREWSTER: Objection. Form. Foundation. trying remember. There may have been subsequent conversations about that. But was not involved those conversations.
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM