Skip to content

Get Judicial Watch Updates!

DONATE

Judicial Watch • JW v DOJ HRC emails 02046 pg 362-366

JW v DOJ HRC emails 02046 pg 362-366

JW v DOJ HRC emails 02046 pg 362-366

Page 1: JW v DOJ HRC emails 02046 pg 362-366

Category:

Number of Pages:5

Date Created:April 8, 2019

Date Uploaded to the Library:April 08, 2019

Tags:Peggy, Chuck, HRC emails 02046, 02046, HRC, State Department, FBI, DOJ, FOIA


File Scanned for Malware

Donate now to keep these documents public!


See Generated Text   ∨

Autogenerated text from PDF

From:
Sent:
To:
Subject: per ODNI
Monday, June 29, 2015 12:27
IFW:-5Btr. Fw: Concerns about the HRC Review... discussed.
-----Original Message----From: Chuck Mccullough
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 11:16
To:
Subject: FW: Fw: Concerns about the HRC Review ... per ODNI
------------------
Need you plugged this. Need coordinate States person.
Chuck Charles McCullough, Ill
lntelligence Community Inspector Generr per ODNI
-----Original Message----From: Unick, Steve (OIG) [mailto:linicksa@state.gov]
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 6:13
To: Chuck Mccullough
Subject: Fw: SS61.: Fw: Concerns about the HRC Review ...
See below
From~
!(01G)..._!- Date: June 28, 2015 9:40:17 EDT
To:!
l(OIG~
~inick, Steve (~IG) J-_ _...[OIG)
b7C
I.._______
Subject: Fw: SBtt: Fw: Concerns about the HRC Review ... per ODNI
Fyi, see bottom email o~.__ __.!assessment over the weekend. will draft out prior Tuesdays
release and will circulate the am.
b7C
From:!
Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2015 09:30
Tot
JOIG);I
J(OIG)
Su6ject: Fw: 5Bt.J: Fw: Concerns about HRC Review ...
HRC-2653
From!
Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2015 05:05 Eastern Standard Time
To: Barr, Joyce Grafeld, Margaret
Subject: Re: Sffl:t: Fw: Concerns about the HRC Review ...
b7C
For your awareness
~nd just spoke about Tuesdays release. was the office and raised the following
issue with me. The 1h1te House asking the Department potentially remove few emails before publish them
Tuesday. asked him let know which ones. did not rais~
!email know that one you are going raise with
Based conversation witQthere appears still ~xpectation that will release emails Tuesday.
agree with Peggy that should get confirmation (preferably writing) about releasing Tuesday.
From: Barr, Joyce
Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2015 04:57 Eastern Standard Time
To: Grafeld, Margaret
ccj
b7C
Subject: Re: 5el* Fw: Concerns about the HRC Review ... got stuck behind accident gas station now. Will come back when get home minutes.
Sent from BlackBerry smartphone.
From: Grafeld, Margaret
Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2015 16:42
To: Barr, Joyce
Suoject: Re: .sett: Fw: Concerns about the HRC Review ...
b7C
Cc:!
Ive been thinking about the best approach (or himself). For number reasons, think better coming
from you, you dont mind. believQhared some related background with you Friday the lxl. Happy talk,
you would like.
BTW, thanks Herculean effort number people working long hours yesterday (doing time consuming and labor
intensive quality control), well ready post/release for sure early Tuesday. That said, really like someone (M?) actually give the word and when. Additionally, this effort provides some insight vis vis Congressional
Document Production that not easy, fully automated process when done right.
From: Barr, Joyce
Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2015 2:32
~~: Grafeld, Marraret
b7C
sulject: Re:~ Fw: Concerns about the HRC Review ... not expert this stuff but this seems pretty in-depth analysis issues that. warrant closer look.
definitely think needs raised with Let pass would forwardLJe-mail K-2 without his
comment the end, entitled his opinion but the blame game doesnt always follow facts. heading out but
let know you want forward this call K-2. Ill keep checking.
HRC-2654
b7C
Sent from BlackBerry smartphone.
From: Grafeld, Margaret
Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2015 11:46
To: Barr, Joyce Cc:I
b7C
Subject: SBtr. Fw: Concerns about the _HRC Review ...
Se~sitive Bt1t U11el8ssified
{Oellberatlvt! a1id fi1edecisio11al liifo11i1etie11)
Joyce, forward
lnessage for your informational awareriess, requested. have not reviewed the docu~ents has, cannot affirm his concerns nor would presume so. Indeed, the multi-level review process for this
b?C
collection was established ensure that wide variety (including those bureaus and offices with the most
contemporary knowledge current sensitivities, not mention referral other agencies for review their respective
equities). That said, would appreciate your consideration raising this with and whether should proceed with Tuesdays scheduled court-ordered release/postir:,g based review Department experts and final review.
With thanks advance for your guidance regarding how proceed.
Peggy
FromL.-------------Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2015 2:46
To: Grafeld, Margaret
b7C
.Cc:!
Suo~Je_c_t_:c=o-n_c_e-rn_s_a_b_o_u_t_t-he....,..H=R~C~R~e-v~ie-w-...
Peggy,
---- ------,. quick note from the office rainy Saturday with some concerns about the HRC review. ask that you pass this note Joyce. the request the State Department OIG, have beeri providing access the HRC collection inspector from
the ICs OIG. This person was here late last night, and here again today. are providing him documents review
based searches Freedom2; providing the search terms. far this work has not interfered with our
production schedule.
While working with this inspector, have personally reviewed hundreds documents the HRC collection. can now
say, without reservation, that there are literally hundreds classified emails this collection; maybe more. For
example, there are comments Department staff emails relating the WikileaJ-t+t,~-2Ct~....,,,...=-------~-----7~b--------b3 per ODNI_ per FBI
--------t-t..-..t;,-Jtr-.,----.r~-,-,=--H:.c?G-,---~r=:t-- :--i,,--~:1-,--..p..,.+--+--..,..,-=1,.,--..,......--+-,--,-~b per FBI_
-------H--~---r:l-=-k--:r-rrl-ilw,t:>A,.---A.=~-L..---1--=----_:._.......:.__-=........___::~....:...,...::.e::.....-,-----b7C
O~?_p/J
---------H-----------------------------....:.._-----~b6 b7C
...
HRC-2657