Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Judicial Watch

Issue Deep Dive

The Steele Dossier & the Obama State Department

“Our [US] ambassador to Ukraine thought that Steele’s reports were “flakey,” Nuland thought they were “extreme”, Fitton stated in last week’s Weekly Update.

“Corrupt” is a word Tom Fitton uses often to describe Christopher Steele and his relationship to the Obama State Department. With newly obtained documents detailing how senior Obama State Department officials “knew he had flakey reports and yet they worked with him to take out Trump,” this couldn’t be more true, at least according to Fitton. “Our [US] ambassador to Ukraine thought that Steele’s reports were “flakey,” Nuland thought they were “extreme”, Fitton explained on Friday. 

“Steele had a big in with the the State Department. He was providing them with all kinds of “intelligence” reports through his company, Orbis.”

As detailed in a recent Judicial Watch press release, Steele and State Department official Jonathan Winer “worked closely together to create aspects of the [Steele] dossier that were used to target Trump.” Judicial Watch uncovered this close cooperation after almost two years of investigations, an effort which now demonstrates that “Christopher Steele had a willing partner with the Obama State Department, despite top officials having little confidence in his work.” “The Obama Administration had multiple warnings that Steele was unreliable though they used his garbage dossier to target Trump and of course the court was never told that these reports were considered flakey.”

“Once again, this is coming out not because of voluntary disclosures by the agencies, it’s because of litigation,” Fitton concluded. “I don’t know where we’d be without Judicial Watch.” 

Support this important litigation by donating to Judicial Watch today, your government watchdog in Washington, DC. 

Related

DOJ Supportive of Judicial Watch in Election Lawsuit

Justice Department Files Statement of Interest in Judicial Watch’s Lawsuit to Compel Oregon to Clean Voter Rolls Judicial Watch Sues Pentagon on Reported Covid Infections at Wuhan ...

Justice Department Files Statement of Interest in Judicial Watch’s Lawsuit to Compel Oregon to…

Press Releases | June 13, 2025
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that the U.S. Department of Justice filed a statement of interest in Judicial Watch’s lawsuit that calls on Oregon’s secretary of ...

Judicial Watch Sues Pentagon for Records on Reported Covid-19 Infections at 2019 Wuhan Games

Press Releases | June 13, 2025
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense for all records regarding U.S. militar...