Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Corruption Chronicles

Big Win For Whistleblowers In Calif.

In a crucial victory for government whistleblowers, the California Supreme Court issued a ruling this week that helps protect public employees who report wrongdoing at their agency.

The case involves a worker (Carole Arbuckle) in the licensing department of the state agency that regulates chiropractors, the Board of Chiropractic Examiners. The employee issued various citations‚ÄĒranging from $100 to $5,000‚ÄĒover the span of a few months to chiropractors who had practiced without a license.¬†

But when Arbuckle tried citing a well-connected chiropractor, who practiced with an expired license for months, she experienced retaliation. The chiropractor, Dr. Sharon Ufberg, happened to be the chairwoman of the state board at the time, a violation in itself since board members must possess a current license.

Arbuckle was repeatedly told by her superiors at the state agency not to cite Dr. Ufberg and she was eventually transferred to a different department. In the interim, Arbuckle confronted a stressful work environment and ‚Äúnumerous indignities.‚ÄĚ ¬†

She eventually filed a retaliation complaint with the State Personnel Board, which got dismissed after an investigator concluded that Arbuckle had not proved the actions were a result of her whistle blowing. Arbuckle then filed a lawsuit in Sacramento County Superior Court, which subsequently got dismissed by an appellate court that ruled state employees could pursue a lawsuit only if the State Personnel Board agreed with their claims. 

The state Supreme Court disagreed this week, writing in its unanimous decision that whistleblowers who suffer retaliation have the right to sue for hefty damages even if they lose their case before the personnel board. 

In the opening paragraph of its 17-page ruling, the High Court reminds that ‚Äúthe Legislature enacted the California Whistleblower Protection Act to protect the right of state employees to report waste, fraud, abuse of authority, violation of law or threat to public health without fear of retribution.‚ÄĚ


Related

Who Is Kamala Harris?

Investigative Bulletin | July 24, 2024
The world will quickly be getting to know presumptive Democratic Party presidential nominee Kamala Harris. Her long relationship‚ÄĒpersonal and political‚ÄĒwith the scandal-scarred Cal...

San Francisco’s basic income program for trans people to end after cuts, conservative lawsuits

In The News | July 24, 2024
From Basic Income Today: In January 2024, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit alleging that the program violates the State of California’s equal protection clause, discriminating on the...

U.S. Sues Nonprofit it Has Paid Billions to House Migrant Youths for Sexually Abusing…

Corruption Chronicles | July 23, 2024
The U.S. government’s largest housing provider for illegal immigrant minors, which has received billions of dollars from American taxpayers since Barack Obama was president, is now...